Home › Cases › 1980-1989 › 1986 › Arizona v. Mauro ›

Arizona v. Mauro

Media Items
Arizona v. Mauro - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Jack Roberts (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Kathleen Kelly Walsh (on behalf of the Respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
85-2121
Petitioner: 
Arizona
Respondent: 
Mauro
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1986-1987)
Opinion: 
481 U.S. 520 (1987)
Argued: 
Tuesday, March 31, 1987
Decided: 
Monday, May 4, 1987
Issues: 
Criminal Procedure, Miranda Warnings
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Arizona v. Mauro , 481 U.S. 520 (1987)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_2121)
(last visited Friday, March 19, 2010).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Arizona, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Miranda Warnings

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Marshall
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Powell
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia

Full Opinion by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Sponsor