Puerto Rico v. Branstad

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Lino J. Saldana (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Brent R. Appel (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
85-2116
Petitioner: 
Puerto Rico
Respondent: 
Branstad
Opinion: 
483 U.S. 219 (1987)
Categories: 
extradition, criminal

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Puerto Rico v. Branstad , 483 U.S. 219 (1987)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_2116)
Facts of the Case: 

Ronald Calder was a native of Iowa working in Puerto Rico, He was charged with first degree murder and attempted murder. After posting bail, he fled to his home state. Puerto Rico submitted a petition to Branstad, Iowa's governor at the time, to extradite Calder for court proceedings. Branstad refused.

Question: 

Do federal courts have the power to order governors to fulfill obligations under the Constitution's Extradition Clause in Article IV, Section 2?

Conclusion: 

Yes. The Court overturned its decision in Kentucky v. Dennison (1861) which had rendered federal courts powerless to enforce the Extradition Clause. The unanimous Court concluded that the precedent in Kentucky was "the product of another age" and "fundamentally incompatible with more than a century of constitutional development."

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Puerto Rico, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Article 4, Section 2, Paragraph 2: Extradition Clause

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's concurrence
Powell
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote a special concurrence
O'Connor
Wrote a special concurrence
Scalia

Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall