School Board of Nassau County v. Arline

Media Items
School Bd. Of Nassau County v. Arline - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
School Bd. Of Nassau County v. Arline - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Brian T. Hayes (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Charles Fried (Solicitor General, Department of Justice, argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal)
George K. Rahdert (on behalf of the Respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
85-1277
Petitioner: 
School Board of Nassau County
Respondent: 
Gene Arline
Opinion: 
480 U.S. 273 (1987)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, School Board of Nassau County v. Arline , 480 U.S. 273 (1987)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1277)
Facts of the Case: 

Gene Arline could no longer teach elementary school because she had tuberculosis, a contagious disease. The superintendent of schools in Nassau County, Florida dismissed her after it became clear that her illness was recurrent. The school system did not grant her financial relief. Arline claimed in a federal district court that this violated Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits state-funded programs from denying relief to applicants solely because they are handicapped. The school conceded it dismissed her solely because of her illness, but contended that a contagious disease like tuberculosis did not qualify her as handicapped. The court ruled that the Act did not define contagious illnesses as handicaps, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed. It found that Arline was "otherwise qualified" to teach except for her illness, and ruled that this qualified her for handicapped benefits.

Question: 

Does Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which provides relief to handicapped individuals, extend relief to individuals afflicted with contagious diseases?

Conclusion: 

Yes. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. delivered the opinion for a 7-2 court. The Court relied on the qualification criteria for "handicapped status" provided by the Department of Health of Human Services (HHS), which Congress authorized to implement the Act. HHS made it clear that the Act covers illnesses that cause a "record of impairment" upon a patient's "major life activities." The Court found that both the "contagious effects of a disease" and "the disease's physical effects" can impair the patient's ability to work. The Act intended to cover "those who are actually physically impaired, but also those who are regarded as impaired," since both conditions can prevent a patient from finding work.

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Arline, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Rehabilitation

Sort by Ideology

Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Rehnquist's dissent
Scalia

Full Opinion by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.