First Eng. Evan. Luth. Church v. Los Angeles

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Michael M. Berger (Argued the cause for the appellant)
Jack R. White (Argued the cause for the appellee)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
85-1199
Appellee: 
Los Angeles
Appellant: 
First Eng. Evan. Luth. Church
Opinion: 
482 U.S. 304 (1987)
Categories: 
eminent domain, jurisdiction, property

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, First Eng. Evan. Luth. Church v. Los Angeles , 482 U.S. 304 (1987)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1199)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1979, the County of Los Angeles passed an ordinance which prohibited construction or reconstruction on land which had been devastated by a flood one year earlier. The First English Evangelical Lutheran Church owned a campground which was affected by this ordinance and it was not allowed to reconstruct buildings on this land which the flood had destroyed.

Question: 

Did the ordinance violate the Fifth Amendment (as applied to the states through the Fourteenth) which prevents government from taking private property for public use without providing just compensation to the owner of the property?

Conclusion: 

The Court held that the ordinance violated the Constitution. Noting that the fate of the Church's property had been in limbo for over six years (the suit which it had filed in 1979 had been denied a hearing as late as October of 1985), Chief Justice Rehnquist argued that, because the church was unable to use its property during this time, a "taking" of the property had occurred. Thus, the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment required the government to exercise one of a number of "options" such as amending the regulation or fair payment for the use of the property in order to protect the Church's constitutional rights.

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for First Eng. Evan. Luth. Church, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Takings Clause

Sort by Seniority

Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist