The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, November 12, 1986
Decision: Tuesday, March 24, 1987
Issues: Civil Rights, Affirmative Action
Categories: affirmative action, employment, government employment, race, sex discrimination

Advocates

Constance E. Brooks (on behalf of Petitioner)
Steven Woodside (on behalf of Respondents)

Facts of the Case

The Transportation Agency, Santa Clara, California promoted Diane Joyce to road dispatcher over Paul Johnson. Both candidates were qualified for the job. As an affirmative action employer, the Agency took into account the sex of the applicants in making the promotion decision.

Question

Did the Agency impermissibly take into account the sex of the applicants in the promotion process and violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

Conclusion

The Court affirmed the promotion procedures of the Agency. Justice Brennan argued that it was not unreasonable to consider sex as one factor among many in making promotion decisions, and that the Agency's actions did not create an absolute barrier to the advancement of men (a quota system did not exist).

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for Transportation Agency, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Wrote the majority opinion
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a regular concurrence
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Powell
Wrote a dissent, joined Scalia's dissent
White
Wrote a special concurrence
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1129/>
(last visited ).