Johnson v. Transportation Agency

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Constance E. Brooks (on behalf of Petitioner)
Steven Woodside (on behalf of Respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
85-1129
Petitioner: 
Johnson
Respondent: 
Transportation Agency
Opinion: 
480 U.S. 616 (1987)
Categories: 
affirmative action, government employment, sex discrimination, race, employment

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Johnson v. Transportation Agency , 480 U.S. 616 (1987)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1129)
Facts of the Case: 

The Transportation Agency, Santa Clara, California promoted Diane Joyce to road dispatcher over Paul Johnson. Both candidates were qualified for the job. As an affirmative action employer, the Agency took into account the sex of the applicants in making the promotion decision.

Question: 

Did the Agency impermissibly take into account the sex of the applicants in the promotion process and violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

Conclusion: 

The Court affirmed the promotion procedures of the Agency. Justice Brennan argued that it was not unreasonable to consider sex as one factor among many in making promotion decisions, and that the Agency's actions did not create an absolute barrier to the advancement of men (a quota system did not exist).

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Transportation Agency, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Brennan
Wrote a dissent, joined Scalia's dissent
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Wrote a regular concurrence
Stevens
Wrote a special concurrence
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia

Full Opinion by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.