Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1985» Smalis v. Pennsylvania

Smalis v. Pennsylvania

Docket: 85-227
Citation: 476 U.S. 140 (1986)
Petitioner: Smalis
Respondent: Pennsylvania

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, April 2, 1986
Decision: Monday, May 5, 1986
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Double Jeopardy

Advocates

Norma Chase (on behalf of Petitioners)
Robert L. Eberhardt (on behalf of Respondents)
Andrew L. Frey (for United States, as amicus curiae in support of Respondents)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Smalis, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Double Jeopardy
Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote the majority opinion
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Full Opinion by Justice Byron R. White

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Smalis v. Pennsylvania, 476 U.S. 140 (1986),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1985/1985_85_227/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement