|
Abstract
| Argument: |
Tuesday, January 14, 1986
|
| Decision: |
Tuesday, March 25, 1986 |
| Issues: |
First Amendment, Free Exercise of Religion |
| Categories: |
first amendment, freedom of religion |
|
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
Goldman was a commissioned officer in the United States Air Force, an Orthodox Jew, and an ordained rabbi. He was not allowed to wear his yarmulke while on duty and in Air Force uniform. An Air Force regulation mandated that indoors, headgear could not be worn "except by armed security police in the performance of their duties."
Question
Did the Air Force Regulation violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment?
Conclusion
The Court held that the Air Force regulation did not violate the Constitution. Justice Rehnquist argued that, generally, First Amendment challenges to military regulations are examined with less scrutiny than similar challenges from civilian society, given the need for the military to "foster instinctive obedience, unity, commitment, and esprit de corps." Since allowing overt religious apparel "would detract from the uniformity sought by dress regulations," the Air Force regulation was necessary and legitimate. In 1987, Congress passed legislation which reversed this decision and allowed members of the armed forces to wear religious apparel in a "neat and conservative" manner.