Goldman v. Weinberger

Media Items
Goldman v. Weinberger - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Kathryn A. Oberly (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Nathan Lewin (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
84-1097
Petitioner: 
Goldman
Respondent: 
Weinberger
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1981-1986)
Opinion: 
475 U.S. 503 (1986)
Categories: 
freedom of religion, first amendment
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Goldman v. Weinberger , 475 U.S. 503 (1986)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1985/1985_84_1097)
Facts of the Case: 

Goldman was a commissioned officer in the United States Air Force, an Orthodox Jew, and an ordained rabbi. He was not allowed to wear his yarmulke while on duty and in Air Force uniform. An Air Force regulation mandated that indoors, headgear could not be worn "except by armed security police in the performance of their duties."

Question: 

Did the Air Force Regulation violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment?

Conclusion: 

The Court held that the Air Force regulation did not violate the Constitution. Justice Rehnquist argued that, generally, First Amendment challenges to military regulations are examined with less scrutiny than similar challenges from civilian society, given the need for the military to "foster instinctive obedience, unity, commitment, and esprit de corps." Since allowing overt religious apparel "would detract from the uniformity sought by dress regulations," the Air Force regulation was necessary and legitimate. In 1987, Congress passed legislation which reversed this decision and allowed members of the armed forces to wear religious apparel in a "neat and conservative" manner.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Weinberger, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Free Exercise of Religion

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Wrote a dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
White
Voted with the minority, joined Brennan's dissent, joined O'Connor's dissent
Marshall
Wrote a dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
Powell
Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Wrote a regular concurrence
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court