Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1984» Thomas v. Union Carbide Agric. Products Co.

Thomas v. Union Carbide Agric. Products Co.

Docket: 84-497
Citation: 473 U.S. 568 (1985)
Appellant: Thomas
Appellee: Union Carbide Agric. Products Co.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, March 26, 1985
Decision: Monday, July 1, 1985
Issues: Economic Activity, Arbitration

Advocates

Kenneth Ward Weinstein (on behalf of the Appellees)
Lawrence G. Wallace (on behalf of the Appellant)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Thomas, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 3, Section 2, Paragraph 1: Case or Controversy Requirement
Voted with the majority
Burger
Wrote a special concurrence
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority, joined Brennan's concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority, joined Brennan's concurrence
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a special concurrence
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Thomas v. Union Carbide Agric. Products Co., 473 U.S. 568 (1985),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_497/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement