Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1984» Williamson Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank

Williamson Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank

Docket: 84-4
Citation: 473 U.S. 172 (1985)
Petitioner: Williamson Planning Comm'n
Respondent: Hamilton Bank

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, February 19, 1985
Decision: Friday, June 28, 1985
Issues: Due Process, Takings Clause

Advocates

Robert L. Estes (on behalf of the petitioners)
Edwin S. Kneedler (on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of petitioners)
G. T. Nebel (on behalf of the respondent)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for Williamson Planning Comm'n, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Takings Clause
Did not participate
Powell
Voted with the majority, joined Brennan's concurrence
Marshall
Wrote a regular concurrence
Brennan
Wrote a special concurrence
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
Blackmun
Wrote a jurisdictional dissent
White
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Williamson Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_4/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement