Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1984» Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Labs.

Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Labs.

Docket: 83-1925
Citation: 471 U.S. 707 (1985)
Appellant: Hillsborough County
Appellee: Automated Medical Labs.

Case Media

Abstract

Oral Argument: Tuesday, April 16, 1985
Decision: Monday, June 3, 1985
Issues: Federalism, Federal Preemption of State Regulation

Advocates

Emeline C. Acton (on behalf of the appellants)
Paul J. Larkin, Jr. (on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of appellants)
Richard Landfield (on behalf of the American Blood Resources Association as amicus curiae in support of appellee)
Larry A. Stumpf (on behalf of the appellee)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Full Opinion: Federalism, Federal Preemption of State Regulation: 9 - 0
Voted with the majority, authored an opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's opinion
Brennan
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's opinion
Stevens
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's opinion
Powell
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's opinion
White
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's opinion
Burger
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's opinion
Rehnquist

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Labs., 471 U.S. 707 (1985),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1925/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement