The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, April 16, 1985
Decision: Monday, June 3, 1985
Issues: Federalism, Federal Preemption of State Regulation

Advocates

Emeline C. Acton (on behalf of the appellants)
Paul J. Larkin, Jr. (on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of appellants)
Richard Landfield (on behalf of the American Blood Resources Association as amicus curiae in support of appellee)
Larry A. Stumpf (on behalf of the appellee)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Hillsborough County, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 42 U.S.C. 262
Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Labs., 471 U.S. 707 (1985),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1925/>
(last visited ).