Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1984» United States v. Locke

United States v. Locke

Docket: 83-1394
Citation: 471 U.S. 84 (1985)
Appellant: United States
Appellee: Locke

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, November 6, 1984
Decision: Monday, April 1, 1985
Issues: Due Process, Takings Clause

Advocates

Carolyn F. Corwin (Argued the cause for the appellants)
Harold A. Swafford (Argued the cause for the appellees)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for United States, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 43 U.S.C. 1744
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Brennan
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
Powell
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a regular concurrence
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. Locke, 471 U.S. 84 (1985),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1394/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement