The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, November 7, 1984
Decision: Wednesday, June 26, 1985
Issues: First Amendment, Establishment of Religion
Categories: first amendment, freedom of religion

Advocates

Paul Gerwitz (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Joseph I. Lieberman (Argued the cause for the State of Connecticut)
Nathan Lewin (Argued the cause for the petitioners)

Facts of the Case

Donald E. Thornton worked as a supervisor in the Caldor department store chain. A devout Presbyterian, Thornton asked to be excused from working Sundays at the company's store in Torrington, Connecticut. The store required its managers to work one of every four Sundays, although rank-and-file employees were exempt under their union contract from Sunday work. In 1979, the company refused to allow Thornton to take off Sundays but offered him a transfer to another store, an hour away in Massachusetts, that was closed on Sundays. When he turned that down, the company said it would demote him from his manager's job and cut his hourly pay from $6.46 to $3.50. Thornton had worked Sundays for nearly eight months before he became aware the store was violating Connecticut law giving employees an absolute right not to work on their chosen Sabbath. He filed a grievance against Caldor with the state board of mediation. The board ruled in his favor. The state supreme court reversed. Thornton's estate (Thornton died in 1982) petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari.

Question

Does the Connecticut statute violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?

Conclusion

Yes. In an opinion authored by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, the Court held 8-to-1 that the Connecticut Sabbath observance statute was void, saying its "unyielding weighing in favor of Sabbath observers over all other interests" results in an unconstitutional mingling of church and state. In his opinion, Burger wrote that the Connecticut law "provides Sabbath observers with an absolute and unqualified right not to work on their Sabbath." Burger said the state law "thus commands that Sabbath religious concerns automatically control over all secular interests at the workplace; the statute takes no account of the convenience or interests of the employer or those of other employees who do not observe a Sabbath."

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 8 votes for Caldor, 1 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Establishment of Religion
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a regular concurrence
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Burger
Voted with the minority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, 472 U.S. 703 (1985),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1158/>
(last visited ).