Estate of Thornton v. Caldor

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Paul Gerwitz (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Nathan Lewin (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Joseph I. Lieberman (Argued the cause for the State of Connecticut)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
83-1158
Petitioner: 
Estate of Thornton
Respondent: 
Caldor
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1981-1986)
Opinion: 
472 U.S. 703 (1985)
Categories: 
freedom of religion, first amendment, establishment of religion

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Estate of Thornton v. Caldor , 472 U.S. 703 (1985)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1158)
Facts of the Case: 

Donald E. Thornton worked as a supervisor in the Caldor department store chain. A devout Presbyterian, Thornton asked to be excused from working Sundays at the company's store in Torrington, Connecticut. The store required its managers to work one of every four Sundays, although rank-and-file employees were exempt under their union contract from Sunday work. In 1979, the company refused to allow Thornton to take off Sundays but offered him a transfer to another store, an hour away in Massachusetts, that was closed on Sundays. When he turned that down, the company said it would demote him from his manager's job and cut his hourly pay from $6.46 to $3.50. Thornton had worked Sundays for nearly eight months before he became aware the store was violating Connecticut law giving employees an absolute right not to work on their chosen Sabbath. He filed a grievance against Caldor with the state board of mediation. The board ruled in his favor. The state supreme court reversed. Thornton's estate (Thornton died in 1982) petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari.

Question: 

Does the Connecticut statute violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In an opinion authored by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, the Court held 8-to-1 that the Connecticut Sabbath observance statute was void, saying its "unyielding weighing in favor of Sabbath observers over all other interests" results in an unconstitutional mingling of church and state. In his opinion, Burger wrote that the Connecticut law "provides Sabbath observers with an absolute and unqualified right not to work on their Sabbath." Burger said the state law "thus commands that Sabbath religious concerns automatically control over all secular interests at the workplace; the statute takes no account of the convenience or interests of the employer or those of other employees who do not observe a Sabbath."

Decisions

Decision: 8 votes for Caldor, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Establishment of Religion

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the minority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote a regular concurrence
O'Connor

Full Opinion by Justice Warren E. Burger