Home › Cases › 1980-1989 › 1983 › United States v. Arthur Young & Co. ›

United States v. Arthur Young & Co.

Media Items
United States v. Arthur Young & Co. - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
William E. Jackson (on behalf of Respondent Amerada Hess Corporation)
Carl D. Liggio (on behalf of Respondent Arthur Young & Company)
Mark I. Levy (on behalf of Petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
82-687
Petitioner: 
United States
Respondent: 
Arthur Young & Co.
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1981-1986)
Opinion: 
465 U.S. 805 (1984)
Argued: 
Monday, January 16, 1984
Decided: 
Wednesday, March 21, 1984
Issues: 
Criminal Procedure, Discovery and Inspection; Federal Taxation, Federal Taxation
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. Arthur Young & Co. , 465 U.S. 805 (1984)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_82_687)
(last visited Sunday, March 14, 2010).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for United States, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Internal Revenue Code

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor

Full Opinion by Justice Warren E. Burger