Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington

Media Items
Regan v. Taxation With Representation Of Wash. - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Rex E. Lee (Solicitor General, Department of Justice, argued the cause for the appellants in No. 81-2338)
John Cary Sims (argued the cause for the appellee in No. 81-2338)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
81-2338
Appellant: 
Donald Regan, Secretary of the Treasury
Appellee: 
Taxation With Representation of Washington
Consolidation: 
No. 82-134, Taxation With Representation of Washington v. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1981-1986)
Opinion: 
461 U.S. 540 (1983)
Location
Javascript is required to view this map.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington , 461 U.S. 540 (1983)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1982/1982_81_2338)
Facts of the Case: 

Two non-profit groups merged to form the group Taxation With Representation of Washington (TWR). One of the original groups obtained 501(c)3 status from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which allowed donors to make tax-deductible donations to it. Because the other group participated in political lobbying, it did not qualify for 501(C)(3) status and could not offer tax-deductible donations. Since the newly formed TWR also participated in "substantial lobbying," the IRS denied it tax-deduction privileges. TWR alleged in District Court that the IRS's "substantial lobbying" restriction for 501(C)(3) status violated its First Amendment rights by imposing an "unconstitutional burden" on its ability to receive tax-deductible donations. TWR also argued that the restriction violated its Fifth Amendment equal protection rights since veterans' organizations that lobbied extensively could receive tax-deductible donations. The District Court dismissed the complaint but the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the "substantial lobbying" restriction did impair TWR's Fifth Amendment equal protection rights.

Question: 

Does the IRS violate the First Amendment by denying 501(c)3 tax-deduction privileges to non-profit groups that participate in "substantial lobbying"?

Does the IRS violate the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment by denying 501(c)3 tax-deduction privileges to non-profit groups that participate in "substantial lobbying"?

Conclusion: 

No and no. Justice William H. Rehnquist authored the opinion for a unanimous court. Allowing a non-profit to solicit tax-deductible donations is a form of paying for its operations. Pointing to its decision in Cammarano v. United States, the Court maintained that "Congress is not required by the First Amendment to subsidize lobbying." The federal government does not have to sponsor every activity that the First Amendment protects, and its choice to sponsor one type of activity does not force it to sponsor every related type of activity. The federal government can choose to support veterans' lobbying organizations without also having to fund the lobbying of other groups. Non-profit groups interested in offering tax-deductions to donors can separate with the parts of the organization engaged in lobbying.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Regan, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority, joined Blackmun's concurrence
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority, joined Blackmun's concurrence
Marshall
Wrote a regular concurrence
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court