Miss. Univ. for Women v. Hogan

Media Items
Miss. Univ. for Women v. Hogan - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Wilbur O. Colom (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Hunter M. Gholson (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
81-406
Petitioner: 
Miss. Univ. for Women
Respondent: 
Hogan
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1981-1986)
Opinion: 
458 U.S. 718 (1982)
Categories: 
conlaw, gender, affirmative action, education
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Miss. Univ. for Women v. Hogan , 458 U.S. 718 (1982)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_81_406)
Facts of the Case: 

Joe Hogan, a registered nurse and qualified applicant, was denied admission to the Mississippi University for Women School of Nursing's baccalaureate program on the basis of sex. Created by a state statute in 1884, MUW was the oldest state-supported all-female college in the United States.

Question: 

Did the state statute which prevented men from enrolling in MUW violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion: 

Yes. The Court held that the state did not provide an "exceedingly persuasive justification" for the gender-based distinction. The state's primary argument, that the policy constituted educational affirmative action for women, was "unpersuasive" to the Court since women traditionally have not lacked opportunities to enter nursing. If anything, argued Justice O'Connor, the statute "tends to perpetuate the stereotyped view of nursing as an exclusively women's job."

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Hogan, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

Sort by Ideology

Wrote a dissent
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Wrote a dissent
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
Powell
Voted with the minority, joined Powell's dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Sponsor