Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1981» Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp.

Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp.

Docket: 81-244
Citation: 458 U.S. 419 (1982)
Appellant: Loretto
Appellee: Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, March 30, 1982
Decision: Wednesday, June 30, 1982
Issues: Due Process, Takings Clause
Categories: fourteenth amendment, police power, property, takings clause

Advocates

Erwin N. Griswold (on behalf of Appellee)
Michael S. Gruen (on behalf of Appellant)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for Loretto, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Takings Clause
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the minority, joined Blackmun's dissent
Brennan
Wrote a dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Blackmun's dissent
White
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_81_244/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement