Home › Cases › 1980-1989 › 1981 › Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp. ›

Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp.

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Erwin N. Griswold (on behalf of Appellee)
Michael S. Gruen (on behalf of Appellant)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
81-244
Appellee: 
Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp.
Appellant: 
Loretto
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1981-1986)
Opinion: 
458 U.S. 419 (1982)
Argued: 
Tuesday, March 30, 1982
Decided: 
Wednesday, June 30, 1982
Issues: 
Due Process, Takings Clause
Categories: 
police power, takings clause, property, fourteenth amendment

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp. , 458 U.S. 419 (1982)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_81_244)
(last visited Sunday, November 22, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Loretto, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Takings Clause

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the minority, joined Blackmun's dissent
Brennan
Voted with the minority, joined Blackmun's dissent
White
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Wrote a dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor

Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall