Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1981» Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.

Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.

Docket: 80-5950
Citation: 455 U.S. 422 (1982)
Appellant: Logan
Appellee: Zimmerman Brush Co.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, October 14, 1981
Decision: Wednesday, February 24, 1982
Issues: Due Process, Hearing or Notice

Advocates

Jay A. Canel (on behalf of the Appellees)
Gary H. Palm (on behalf of the Appellant)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Logan, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Due Process
Voted with the majority, joined Blackmun's concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority, joined Blackmun's concurrence
Brennan
Wrote the majority opinion, joined multiple concurrences
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a special concurrence
Powell
Voted with the majority, joined Blackmun's concurrence
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority, joined Powell's concurrence
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422 (1982),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_5950/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement