http://www.oyez.org/cases/1975/podcast U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) en The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_377/argument None Wed, 28 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54831 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_491/argument None Wed, 28 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54648 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_552/argument None Wed, 28 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54842 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_19/argument Using marked money, police officers made an undercover heroin buy from a third party who, upon taking money from the officers, entered "Mom Santana's" house and emerged with heroin. Officers then arrested the third party and returned to Santana's house where they identified themselves as police officers, entered the house after Santana fled into it from the porch, and, after ordering her to empty her pockets, discovered some of the marked money. The search was done without a warrant. Tue, 27 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54844 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_164/argument-1 None Tue, 27 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54833 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_164/argument-2 None Tue, 27 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54834 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_44/argument None Tue, 27 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54794 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1560/argument Martinez-Fuerte and others were charged with transporting illegal Mexican aliens. They were stopped at a routine fixed checkpoint for brief questioning of the vehicle's occupants on a major highway not far from the Mexican border. Mon, 26 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54719 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_62/argument Michael McCrary and Colin Gonzales were black children who were denied admission to Bobbe's School. Gonzales was also denied admission to Fairfax- Brewster School. McCrary and Gonzales's parents filed a class action against the schools, suspecting the denials were due to their children's race. A federal district court ruled for McCrary and Gonzales, finding that the school's admission policies were racially discriminatory. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the decision. Mon, 26 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54642 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_420/argument-1 None Mon, 26 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54800 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_420/argument-2 None Mon, 26 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54801 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_520/argument None Wed, 21 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54606 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_252/argument None Wed, 21 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54829 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_5027/argument None Tue, 20 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54788 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_251/argument-1 None Tue, 20 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54612 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_251/argument-2 None Tue, 20 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54613 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_382/argument None Tue, 20 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54662 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_260/argument None Tue, 20 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54812 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_817/argument A Nebraska state trial judge, presiding over a widely publicized murder trial, entered an order restraining members of the press from publishing or broadcasting accounts of confessions made by the accused to the police. The judge felt that this measure was necessary to guarantee a fair trial to the accused. Mon, 19 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54717 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_246/argument-1 None Mon, 19 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54771 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_246/argument-2 None Mon, 19 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54772 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_64_orig/argument None Mon, 19 Apr 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54610 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_5706/argument Following his Florida conviction for first-degree murder and the imposition of the death penalty, Proffitt challenged the constitutionality of both his death sentence, alleging it was a "cruel and unusual" punishment, and Florida's capital-sentencing procedure, alleging is was arbitrary and capricious insofar as it permitted judges rather than juries to act as sole sentencing authorities. This case is one of the five "Death Penalty Cases" along with Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, Roberts v. Louisiana, and Woodson v. North Carolina. Wed, 31 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54721 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_6257/argument A jury found Gregg guilty of armed robbery and murder and sentenced him to death. On appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence except as to its imposition for the robbery conviction. Gregg challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, claiming that his capital sentence was a "cruel and unusual" punishment that violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. This case is one of the five "Death Penalty Cases" along with Jurek v. Texas, Roberts v. Louisiana, Proffitt v. Florida, and Woodson v. North Carolina. Wed, 31 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54644 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_5491/argument The state of North Carolina enacted legislation that made the death penalty mandatory for all convicted first-degree murderers. Consequently, when James Woodson was found guilty of such an offense, he was automatically sentenced to death. Woodson challenged the law, which was upheld by the Supreme Court of North Carolina. This case is one of the five "Death Penalty Cases" along with Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, Proffitt v. Florida, and Roberts v. Louisiana. Wed, 31 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54580 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_268/argument None Tue, 30 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54774 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_5844/argument-1 Following his conviction for first-degree murder, and subsequent imposition of a death sentence, Roberts challenged the constitutionality of Louisiana's death penalty scheme. This scheme mandated the death penalty's imposition, regardless of any mercy recommendation, whenever the jury found that the defendant demonstrated a specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm while in the commission of at least one of five different narrowly defined types of homicide. The sentencing scheme also required juries, in all first- degree murder cases, to be instructed on the lesser charges of manslaughter and second degree murder even if no evidence existed to support such verdicts. This case is one of the five "Death Penalty Cases" along with Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, Proffitt v. Florida, and Woodson v. North Carolina. Tue, 30 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54546 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_5394/argument-1 After his conviction by a Texas trial court for murder and the imposition of the death penalty, Jurek challenged the constitutionality of both his death sentence, alleging it was a "cruel and unusual" punishment, and the state's capital-sentencing procedure, alleging it would result in arbitrary and "freakish" imposition of the death penalty. This case is one of the five "Death Penalty Cases" along with Gregg v. Georgia, Proffitt v. Florida, Roberts v. Louisiana, and Woodson v. North Carolina. Tue, 30 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54737 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_5844/argument-2 Following his conviction for first-degree murder, and subsequent imposition of a death sentence, Roberts challenged the constitutionality of Louisiana's death penalty scheme. This scheme mandated the death penalty's imposition, regardless of any mercy recommendation, whenever the jury found that the defendant demonstrated a specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm while in the commission of at least one of five different narrowly defined types of homicide. The sentencing scheme also required juries, in all first- degree murder cases, to be instructed on the lesser charges of manslaughter and second degree murder even if no evidence existed to support such verdicts. This case is one of the five "Death Penalty Cases" along with Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, Proffitt v. Florida, and Woodson v. North Carolina. Tue, 30 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54547 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_5394/argument-2 After his conviction by a Texas trial court for murder and the imposition of the death penalty, Jurek challenged the constitutionality of both his death sentence, alleging it was a "cruel and unusual" punishment, and the state's capital-sentencing procedure, alleging it would result in arbitrary and "freakish" imposition of the death penalty. This case is one of the five "Death Penalty Cases" along with Gregg v. Georgia, Proffitt v. Florida, Roberts v. Louisiana, and Woodson v. North Carolina. Tue, 30 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54738 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_130/argument None Tue, 30 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54700 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_145/argument None Mon, 29 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54838 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_76/argument None Mon, 29 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54634 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1254/argument None Mon, 29 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54558 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1487/argument None Mon, 29 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54616 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_6521/argument None Wed, 24 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54676 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_455/argument None Wed, 24 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54684 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_339/argument None Wed, 24 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54650 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1393/argument None Tue, 23 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54666 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_73/argument Massachusetts enacted a law specifying consent requirements for unmarried minors seeking abortions. William Baird, on behalf of an abortion counseling organization, Parents Aid Society, filed a class action under the Fourteenth Amendment challenging the statute against state Attorney General Frances Bellotti and all district attorneys within the state. Baird argued that the statute created a parental veto. Parental vetoes were ruled unconstitutional in Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. The federal District Court struck down the law. Bellotti appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, contending that the District Court should have abstained until a decision on the statute by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Tue, 23 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54638 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1151/argument None Tue, 23 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54668 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1488/argument None Tue, 23 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54767 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_328/argument None Mon, 22 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54588 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_185/argument None Mon, 22 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54569 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_95/argument None Mon, 22 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54765 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_292/argument None Mon, 22 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54751 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_110/argument None Wed, 03 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54652 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1318/argument None Wed, 03 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54706 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_250/argument None Wed, 03 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54786 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1471/argument None Wed, 03 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54759 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1599/argument None Tue, 02 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54769 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_768/argument-2 None Mon, 01 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54709 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1563/argument None Mon, 01 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54632 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1303/argument None Mon, 01 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54658 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_768/argument-1 None Mon, 01 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54708 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1492/argument After the applications of two blacks were rejected by the District of Columbia Police Department, the two men filed suit against Mayor Walter E. Washington. The men alleged that the Department's recruiting procedures, including a written personnel test, discriminated against racial minorities. They claimed that the test was unrelated to job performance and excluded a disproportionate number of black applicants. Mon, 01 Mar 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54618 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1646/argument None Wed, 25 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54556 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1608/argument None Wed, 25 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54763 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1452/argument None Wed, 25 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54690 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1529/argument None Tue, 24 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54704 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1055/argument Lloyd Powell was convicted of murder by a California court. Powell sought relief in federal district court by filing a writ of federal habeas corpus. Powell claimed that the search that uncovered the murder weapon was unlawful and that the evidence should have been inadmissible at trial. This case was decided together with Wolf v. Rice. Tue, 24 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54599 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1055/74-1222_argument Lloyd Powell was convicted of murder by a California court. Powell sought relief in federal district court by filing a writ of federal habeas corpus. Powell claimed that the search that uncovered the murder weapon was unlawful and that the evidence should have been inadmissible at trial. This case was decided together with Wolf v. Rice. Tue, 24 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62193 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1481/argument None Mon, 23 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54790 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_730/argument None Mon, 23 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54563 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_5014/argument None Mon, 23 Feb 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54602 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1542/argument None Wed, 21 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54798 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_73_861/argument None Wed, 21 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54778 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1607/argument None Wed, 21 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54820 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_858/argument None Tue, 20 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54735 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1047/argument None Tue, 20 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54782 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1656/argument None Tue, 20 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54694 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1589/argument-2 None Mon, 19 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54574 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1245/argument None Mon, 19 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54646 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1589/reargument None Mon, 19 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62288 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_36_orig/argument None Mon, 19 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54731 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1589/argument-1 None Mon, 19 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54573 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_6293/argument None Wed, 14 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54715 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_940/argument None Wed, 14 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54549 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_122/argument None Wed, 14 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54733 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1435/argument None Tue, 13 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54822 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_6212/argument None Tue, 13 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54620 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_88/argument None Tue, 13 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54803 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_220/argument None Tue, 13 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54678 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1179/argument Mitch Miller was charged of carrying alcohol distilling equipment and whiskey on which liquor tax had not been paid. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) issued subpoenas to two of Miller's banks, The Citizens & Southern National Bank of Warner Robins and the Bank of Byron requesting records of Miller's accounts. The banks complied with the subpoenas, and the evidence was used during Miller's trial in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. Miller was convicted and appealed his conviction alleging that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in his favor. Mon, 12 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54654 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1107/argument None Mon, 12 Jan 1976 13:00:00 +0000 54686 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_882/argument None Tue, 16 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54702 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1274/argument None Tue, 16 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54808 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1187/argument None Mon, 15 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54696 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1141/argument None Mon, 15 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54682 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1187/74-1194_argument None Mon, 15 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62192 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_532/argument None Mon, 15 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54792 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1044/argument Robert Murgia, although he was in excellent physical and mental health, was forced to retire at age fifty according to state law. Murgia had been a uniformed officer in the state police force. Murgia successfully challenged the mandatory retirement law in district court. Wed, 10 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54660 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1124/argument None Wed, 10 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54824 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1329/argument None Wed, 10 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54656 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1409/argument None Tue, 09 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54604 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1270/argument None Tue, 09 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54576 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_5808/argument-1 None Tue, 09 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54805 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1033/argument None Tue, 09 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54636 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_5808/argument-2 None Tue, 09 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54806 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1216/argument None Mon, 08 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54723 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1269/argument None Mon, 08 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54590 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1216/argument-1 None Mon, 08 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54724 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_958/argument None Mon, 08 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54711 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1267/argument None Mon, 08 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54584 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1216/argument-2 None Mon, 08 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54725 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_73_6935/argument None Mon, 08 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54560 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_883/argument None Wed, 03 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54742 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_68_orig/argument None Wed, 03 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54592 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1042/argument None Wed, 03 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54713 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_68_orig/69orig_argument None Wed, 03 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 66317 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1137/argument None Tue, 02 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54761 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_928/argument None Tue, 02 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54597 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_492/argument None Tue, 02 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54586 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1302/argument None Tue, 02 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54595 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_5822/argument Jules Hutton was a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) informant that made the acquaintance of Charles Hampton. According to the government, Hampton told Hutton that he could acquire heroin and was willing to sell it. Hutton replied that he would find a buyer and orchestrate a sale. Hampton and Hutton arranged two appointments with DEA agents posing as buyers. At the second appointment, Hampton was arrested. According to Hampton, he was unaware that he was selling heroin. He claimed that Hutton provided him with the drugs and that Hutton had told him they were counterfeit. Since the government, through Hutton, had provided him with the drugs, he had been entrapped and was therefore not guilty. Hampton was convicted after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. He appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, alleging entrapment and a violation of the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. The Eighth Circuit affirmed his conviction. Mon, 01 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54727 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1148/argument None Mon, 01 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54749 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_5968/argument None Mon, 01 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54827 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1243/argument None Mon, 01 Dec 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54680 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_799/reargument None Wed, 12 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62287 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1025/argument None Wed, 12 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54571 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_799/argument None Wed, 12 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54692 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_753/argument None Wed, 12 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54554 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1023/argument None Tue, 11 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54561 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_895/argument Acting on behalf of prescription drug consumers, the Virginia Citizens Consumer Council challenged a Virginia statute that declared it unprofessional conduct for licensed pharmacists to advertise their prescription drug prices. On appeal from an adverse ruling by a three-judge District Court panel, the Supreme Court granted the Virginia State Board of Pharmacy review. Tue, 11 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54810 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_942/argument None Tue, 11 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54698 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_775/argument None Tue, 11 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54622 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_895/argument-t Acting on behalf of prescription drug consumers, the Virginia Citizens Consumer Council challenged a Virginia statute that declared it unprofessional conduct for licensed pharmacists to advertise their prescription drug prices. On appeal from an adverse ruling by a three-judge District Court panel, the Supreme Court granted the Virginia State Board of Pharmacy review. Tue, 11 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 65363 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_436/argument-1 In the wake of the Watergate affair, Congress attempted to ferret out corruption in political campaigns by restricting financial contributions to candidates. Among other things, the law set limits on the amount of money an individual could contribute to a single campaign and it required reporting of contributions above a certain threshold amount. The Federal Election Commission was created to enforce the statute. Mon, 10 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54744 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_75_436/argument-2 In the wake of the Watergate affair, Congress attempted to ferret out corruption in political campaigns by restricting financial contributions to candidates. Among other things, the law set limits on the amount of money an individual could contribute to a single campaign and it required reporting of contributions above a certain threshold amount. The Federal Election Commission was created to enforce the statute. Mon, 10 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54745 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_744/argument None Wed, 05 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54796 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_754/argument None Wed, 05 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54582 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_848/argument None Wed, 05 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54670 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_5566/argument None Tue, 04 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54674 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_891/argument A flyer identifying "active shoplifters" was distributed to merchants in the Louisville, Kentucky area. The flyer included a photograph of Edward C. Davis III, who had been arrestedon a shoplifting charge. When the charge was dismissed, Davis brought an action against Edgar Paul, the Louisville chief of police. Davis alleged that the distribution of the flyer had stigmatized him and deprived him of his constitutional rights. Tue, 04 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54640 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_100/argument None Tue, 04 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54757 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_850/argument None Tue, 04 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54578 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_728/argument None Mon, 03 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54755 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_18/argument None Mon, 03 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54565 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_869/argument None Mon, 03 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54672 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_5435/argument None Mon, 03 Nov 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54567 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_687/argument None Wed, 15 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54780 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1396/argument The Michelin Tire Corporation (MTC) operated a warehouse in Gwinnett County, Georgia, in which products imported from France and Nova Scotia were stored for later distribution. The County levied a nondiscriminatory ad valorem property tax on the goods (a percent of the property's value). MTC claimed that the contents of the warehouse were constitutionally free from state taxation because they were in their original containers. The county declared that the products were subject to the tax because they had been sorted and arranged for sale. Wed, 15 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54753 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_773/argument None Tue, 14 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54836 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_966/argument None Tue, 14 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54816 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_125/argument None Tue, 14 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54628 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_944/argument None Tue, 14 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54608 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_125/argument-1 None Tue, 14 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54629 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_125/argument-2 None Tue, 14 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54630 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_54/argument None Wed, 08 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54688 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_712/argument None Wed, 08 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54747 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_538/argument None Wed, 08 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54784 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_489/argument None Wed, 08 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54624 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_206/argument None Tue, 07 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54729 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_676/argument None Tue, 07 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54776 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_759/argument None Tue, 07 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54840 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_742/argument None Tue, 07 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54740 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_204/argument George Eldridge, who had originally been deemed disabled due to chronic anxiety and back strain, was informed by letter that his disability status was ending and that his benefits would be terminated. Social Security Administration procedures provided for ample notification and an evidentiary hearing before a final determination was made, but Eldridge's benefits were cut off until that hearing could take place. Eldridge challenged the termination of his benefits without such a hearing. Mon, 06 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54626 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_653/argument None Mon, 06 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54818 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_884/argument None Mon, 06 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54664 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_73_2066/argument None Mon, 06 Oct 1975 13:00:00 +0000 54814 at http://www.oyez.org