The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Decision: Thursday, December 13, 1979
Issues: Judicial Power, Standing to Sue, Justiciable Question

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

President Jimmy Carter acted without congressional approval in ending a defense treaty with Taiwan.

Question

Did Congress have a constitutional role to play in the termination of the treaty?

Conclusion

Without oral argument ,the divided justices found that the case was not justiciable. Rehnquist led a group of four others who believed that the issue involved a political question, namely, how the President and Congress would conduct the nation's foreign affairs. Justice Powell did not find the case ripe for judicial review. He reasoned that since Congress had not formally challenged Carter's authority, technically there was no conflict for the Court to resolve. The dissenters were prepared to hear the case.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 8 votes for Carter, 1 vote(s) against
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Wrote a dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's concurrence
Stevens
Wrote a special concurrence
Blackmun
Voted with the majority, joined Blackmun's concurrence
White
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's concurrence
Stewart
Wrote a regular concurrence
Powell
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's concurrence
Burger
Wrote a regular concurrence
Rehnquist
Memorandum

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U.S. 996 (1979),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1979/1979_79_856/>
(last visited ).