United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians

Media Items
Advocates
Louis F. Claiborne (Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, argued the cause for the United States)
Arthur Lazarus Jr. (argued the cause for the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
79-639
Petitioner: 
United States
Respondent: 
Sioux Nation of Indians
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1975-1981)
Opinion: 
448 U.S. 371 (1980)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians , 448 U.S. 371 (1980)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1979/1979_79_639)
Facts of the Case: 

In the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868, the United States granted the Sioux Indian Nation the Great Sioux Reservation, including the Black Hills of South Dakota. Congress reneged in 1877, passing an act that reclaimed the Black Hills. The Sioux Nation requested compensation in 1920. The United States Court of Claims ruled against the Sioux Nation in 1942. Congress then established the Indian Claims Commission in 1946. The Commission ruled that the Sioux Nation was not barred by the Court of Claims decision and ruled that Congress used its powers of eminent domain in 1877 and the Sioux were therefore entitled to compensation. The Court of Claims maintained that the Sioux were barred by their first case. Congress amended the Indian Claims Commission Act in 1978, removing the judicial bar. The Court of Claims then held that the Sioux were entitled to $17.1 million.

Question: 

(1) Was Congress' 1978 amendment a violation of separation of powers?

(2) Was the reclamation of land in 1877 a taking of property requiring compensation under the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment?

Conclusion: 

No and yes. In an 8-1 decision, the Court held that Congress did not violate the doctrine of separation of powers and affirmed the Court of Claims decision. Writing for the majority, Justice Harry A. Blackmun noted a similar situation in Nock v. United States, where a congressional exemption from a judicial bar was ruled not to be in violation of separation of powers and upheld by the Court. Additionally, since Congress "had not made a good-faith effort to give the Sioux the full value of the Black Hills," Congress' 1877 action qualified as use of its eminent domain power under Three Tribes of Fort Berthold Reservation v. United States. Therefore, the Sioux were entitled to compensation under the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Justice Byron R. White wrote an opinion concurring in part and in the judgment.

Decisions

Decision: 8 votes for Sioux Nation Of Indians, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 25 U.S.C. 70

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Wrote a special concurrence
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Wrote the majority opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens

Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun