RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS INC. v. VIRGINIA

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
79-243
Petitioner 
Richmond Newspapers Inc.
Respondent 
Virginia
Advocates
(Argued the cause for the appellees)
(on behalf of Virginia, et al)
(Argued the cause for the appellants)
Tags
Term:
Facts of the Case 

After a series of mistrials in a murder case in the state of Virginia, a trial judge closed the trial to the public and the media. Defense counsel brought the closure motion; the prosecution did not object. Two reporters of Richmond Newspapers, Inc. challenged the judge's action.

Question 

Did the closure of the trial to the press and public violate the First Amendment or the Sixth Amendment?

Conclusion 
Decision: 7 votes for Richmond Newspapers Inc., 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

In a 7-to-1 decision, the Court held that the right to attend criminal trials was "implicit in the guarantees of the First Amendment." The Court held that the First Amendment encompassed not only the right to speak but also the freedom to listen and to receive information and ideas. The Court also noted that the First Amendment guaranteed the right of assembly in public places such as courthouses. The Court emphasized that "certain unarticulated rights" were implicit in enumerated guarantees and were often "indispensable to the enjoyment of rights explicitly defined."

Cite this Page
RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS INC. v. VIRGINIA. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 31 August 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1979/1979_79_243>.
RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS INC. v. VIRGINIA, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1979/1979_79_243 (last visited August 31, 2014).
"RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS INC. v. VIRGINIA," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed August 31, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1979/1979_79_243.