Bellotti v. Baird

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
78-329
Appellee: 
Baird
Appellant: 
Bellotti
Consolidation: 
Hunerwadel v. Baird, No. 78-330
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1975-1981)
Opinion: 
443 U.S. 622 (1979)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Bellotti v. Baird , 443 U.S. 622 (1979)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1978/1978_78_329)
Facts of the Case: 

A Massachusetts law required minors to gain parental consent before having an abortion. However, if either or both of the parents refused, a judge of the superior court could allow a minor to have the procedure "for good cause shown."

Question: 

Did the law unconstitutionally restrict the right of a minor to have an abortion?

Conclusion: 

The Court found the statute unconstitutional for two reasons. First, it allowed judicial authorization for an abortion to be withheld from a minor who is mature and competent enough to make the decision independently. Second, it required parental notification in all cases (parents were required to be notified if their daughter initiated proceedings in superior court) without allowing the minor to seek an independent judicial assessment of her competence to decide the abortion issue.

Decisions

Decision: 8 votes for Baird, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Due Process

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Wrote a dissent
White
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
Blackmun
Wrote the judgment of the Court
Powell
Wrote a regular concurrence
Rehnquist
Wrote a special concurrence
Stevens

Judgment of the Court by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr.