The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, October 11, 1977
Decision: Tuesday, February 21, 1978
Issues: Federalism, Natural Resources, State Tax

Advocates

William D. Dexter (Argued the cause for the appellees)
Erwin N. Griswold (Argued the cause for the appellants)

Facts of the Case

In 1972, twenty one states were members of the Multistate Tax Compact, a body formed by states to assist them in formulating and administering tax law relating to multistate businesses. The Compact had not received congressional approval.

Question

Did the formation of this group violate the the Compact Clause of Article I?

Conclusion

The Court found no constitutional violation. The Compact did not enhance state political power at the expense of the United States; it not confer to states powers which they did not already possess; it did not involve any delegation of state power to the Commission. Furthermore, argued Justice Powell, each state was free to withdraw from the group at any time.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for Multistate Tax Comm., 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 1, Section 10, Paragraph 3: Compact Clause
Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Wrote a dissent
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the minority, joined White's dissent
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Full Opinion by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, U.S. Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Comm., 434 U.S. 452 (1978),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1977/1977_76_635/>
(last visited ).