United States v. California

Media Items
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Allan A. Ryan, Jr. (argued the cause for the United States)
Russell Iungerich (argued the cause for California)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
5 ORIG
Plaintiff: 
United States
Defendant: 
California
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1975-1981)
Opinion: 
436 U.S. 32 (1978)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. California , 436 U.S. 32 (1978)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1977/1977_5_orig)
Facts of the Case: 

Channel Islands National Monument is a nationally designated area off the coast of California, including Anacapa and Santa Barbara Islands. In 1949, President Harry S Truman issued a proclamation that extended the boundary of the National Monument within one nautical mile of the islands.

Question: 

Does California have jurisdiction over the submerged lands and waters under the Submerged Lands Act of 1953?

Conclusion: 

Yes. Writing for the majority, Justice Potter Stewart determined that under the Submerged Lands Act of 1953 after the 1947 United States v. California decision, Congress specified that the lands in dispute were under California's control.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for California, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Submerged Lands Acts

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the minority, joined White's dissent
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote the majority opinion
Stewart
Wrote a dissent
White
Did not participate
Marshall
Voted with the minority, joined White's dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens

Full Opinion by Justice Potter Stewart