Complete Auto Transit Inc. v. Brady

Media Items
Complete Auto Transit Inc. v. Brady - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Complete Auto Transit Inc. v. Brady - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Alan W. Perry (Argued the cause for the appellant)
James H. Haddock (Argued the cause for the appellee)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
76-29
Appellee: 
Brady
Appellant: 
Complete Auto Transit Inc.
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1975-1981)
Opinion: 
430 U.S. 274 (1977)
Categories: 
conlaw
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Complete Auto Transit Inc. v. Brady , 430 U.S. 274 (1977)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_76_29)
Facts of the Case: 

Complete Auto Transit was a Michigan corporation doing business in Mississippi. Complete shipped cars into the state where they were distributed for sale. Mississippi imposed a tax on transportation companies for the "privilege of doing business" in the state. The tax was applied equally to businesses involved in intra- and interstate commerce.

Question: 

Did the Mississippi tax violate the Commerce Clause because it placed a burden on an activity associated with interstate commerce?

Conclusion: 

A unanimous Court found the tax valid. Businesses involved in interstate commerce should assume a just share of the state tax burden. The Court's decision established four criteria to be met for a state tax to be valid and not an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce. The tax must be (1) on an activity connected to the state, (2) fairly apportioned to be based on intrastate commerce, (3) nondiscriminatory, and (4) related to state services provided. These criteria are only valid if Congress has not imposed conflicting regulations.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Brady, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 3: Interstate Commerce Clause

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Wrote the majority opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens

Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun