Whalen v. Roe

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
H. Miles Jaffe (Argued the cause for appellees Patient et al)
A. Seth Greenwald (Argued the cause for the appellant)
Michael Lesch (Argued the cause for appellees Roe et al)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
75-839
Appellee: 
Roe
Appellant: 
Whalen
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1975-1981)
Opinion: 
429 U.S. 589 (1977)
Categories: 
police power, privacy

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Whalen v. Roe , 429 U.S. 589 (1977)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_839)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1972, the state legislature enacted the New York State Controlled Substances Act. The Act required doctors to fill out forms for potentially harmful prescription drugs. The prescribing doctor kept one copy, while another copy was sent to the dispensing pharmacy and a third copy was sent to the state department of health. The forms included personal information such as the patient's name, address, and age.

Question: 

Did the reporting and record-keeping requirements violate the constitutional right to privacy embraced by the concept of liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion: 

The Court held that the requirements of the Act did not on its face violate a "constitutionally protected 'zone of privacy.'" The Court found that the statutory scheme evidenced "a proper concern with, and protection of, the individual's interest in privacy" and that the "remote possibility" of potential abuses of data accumulation and disclosure were not sufficient to establish an invasion of any rights or liberties protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Whalen, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Due Process

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Wrote a regular concurrence
Brennan
Wrote a regular concurrence
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens

Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens