Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp.

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
F. Willis Caruso (Argued the cause for respondents)
Jack M. Siegel (Argued the cause for petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
75-616
Petitioner: 
Arlington Heights
Respondent: 
Metropolitan Housing Corp.
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1975-1981)
Opinion: 
429 U.S. 252 (1977)
Categories: 
housing, standing, fourteenth amendment, equal protection, race discrimination

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp. , 429 U.S. 252 (1977)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_616)
Facts of the Case: 

The Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. (MHDC) contracted with the Village of Arlington Heights ("Arlington") to build racially integrated low- and moderate-income housing. When MHDC applied for the necessary zoning permits, authorizing a switch from a single- to a multiple-family classification, Arlington's planning commission denied the request. Acting on behalf of itself and several minority members, MHDC challenged Arlington's denial as racially discriminatory. On appeal from an adverse district court decision, the Court of Appeals reversed and the Supreme Court granted Arlington certiorari.

Question: 

Was Arlington Height's denial of a zoning request, necessary for the creation of low- and moderate-income housing, racially discriminatory in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause?

Conclusion: 

Perhaps. After finding that MHDC had proper federal standing, since it acted on behalf of black plaintiffs who stood to suffer direct and measurable injuries from Arlington's denial, the Court held that it failed to establish Arlington's racially discriminatory intent or purpose. While indicating that Arlington's zoning denial may result in a racially disproportionate impact, the evidence did not show that this was Arlington's deliberate intention. Accordingly, the Court reversed and remanded for further consideration.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Arlington Heights, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the minority, joined Marshall's dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Wrote a dissent
White
Wrote a dissent
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Did not participate
Stevens

Full Opinion by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr.