Trimble v. Gordon

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
75-5952
Appellee: 
Gordon
Appellant: 
Trimble
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1975-1981)
Opinion: 
430 U.S. 762 (1977)
Categories: 
property, equal protection

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Trimble v. Gordon , 430 U.S. 762 (1977)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_5952)
Facts of the Case: 

Section 12 of the Illinois Probate Act, while allowing legitimate children to inherit by intestate succession from either their mothers or fathers, allowed illegitimate children to inherit by intestate succession only from their mothers. Consequently, Deta Trimble, the illegitimate daughter of Sherman Gordon, was unable to inherit her father's estate when he died intestate. After losing her challenge to Section 12 in the Illinois Supreme Court, Trimble appealed to the Supreme Court.

Question: 

Did Section 12 of the Illinois Probate Act violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion: 

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that Section 12 was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. Applying the "rational relationship" test under the Clause, the Court emphasized that such a standard was not a "toothless" one. The Court then rejected the argument "that a State may attempt to influence the actions of men and women by imposing sanctions on the children born of their illegitimate relationships." The Court also noted that it was likely that Trimble would have inherited a substantial part of Gordon's estate had he written a will before his death.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Trimble, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

Sort by Ideology

Co-authored a dissent
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Co-authored a dissent
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Co-authored a dissent
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Powell
Wrote a dissent, joined multiple dissents
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens

Full Opinion by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr.