Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Consumer Council

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Alan B. Morrison (Argued the cause for the appellees)
Anthony F. Troy (Argued the cause for the appellants)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
74-895
Appellee: 
Virginia Consumer Council
Appellant: 
Virginia Pharmacy Bd.
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1975-1981)
Opinion: 
425 U.S. 748 (1976)
Categories: 
standing, freedom of speech

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Consumer Council , 425 U.S. 748 (1976)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_895)
Facts of the Case: 

Acting on behalf of prescription drug consumers, the Virginia Citizens Consumer Council challenged a Virginia statute that declared it unprofessional conduct for licensed pharmacists to advertise their prescription drug prices. On appeal from an adverse ruling by a three-judge District Court panel, the Supreme Court granted the Virginia State Board of Pharmacy review.

Question: 

Is a statutory ban on advertising prescription drug prices by licensed pharmacists a violation of "commercial speech" under the First Amendment?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a 7-to-1 opinion, the Court held that the First Amendment protects willing speakers and willing listeners equally. The Court noted that in cases of commercial speech, such as price advertising, freedom of speech protections apply just as they would to noncommercial speech. Even speech that is sold for profit, or involves financial solicitations, is protected. The Court concluded that although the Virginia State Board of Pharmacy has a legitimate interest in preserving professionalism among its members, it may not do so at the expense of public knowledge about lawful competitive pricing terms.

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Virginia Consumer Council, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

Sort by Ideology

Wrote a regular concurrence
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote a regular concurrence
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Wrote the majority opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Did not participate
Stevens

Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun