|
Abstract
| Argument: |
Wednesday, December 18, 1974
|
| Decision: |
Monday, June 16, 1975 |
| Issues: |
First Amendment, Commercial Speech |
| Categories: |
abortion, criminal, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, standing |
|
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
A Virginia statute made it a misdemeanor for "any person, by publication, lecture, advertisement, or by the sale or circulation of any publication, or in any other manner, [from encouraging] or [prompting] the procuring of abortion or miscarriage." Bigelow, director and managing editor of the Virginia Weekly, was convicted under this law when his newspaper ran an advertisement for an organization which referred women to clinics and hospitals for abortions.
Question
Did the Virginia law violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution?
Conclusion
The Court held that the Virginia law infringed upon Bigelow's First Amendment rights and violated the Constitution. Citing prior holdings such as New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), Justice Blackmun denied the Supreme Court of Virginia's ruling that commercial speech is not afforded First Amendment protection. Furthermore, the advertisement in question contained important information in the "public interest" which went beyond merely informing readers of a commercial service. Finally, the Court feared that the Virginia statute had the potential to "impair" national and interstate publications which might choose to carry similar advertisements.