Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1970-1979» 1972» Ham v. South Carolina

Ham v. South Carolina

Docket: 71-5139
Citation: 409 U.S. 524 (1973)
Petitioner: Ham
Respondent: South Carolina

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Monday, November 6, 1972
Decision: Wednesday, January 17, 1973
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Extra-Legal Jury Influences, Voir Dire

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for Ham, 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Due Process
Wrote a dissent
Douglas
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote a dissent
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Burger
Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Ham v. South Carolina, 409 U.S. 524 (1973),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1972/1972_71_5139/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement