Home › Cases › 1970-1979 › 1971 › Flood v. Kuhn ›

Flood v. Kuhn

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Arthur J. Goldberg (argued the cause for the petitioner)
Paul A. Porter (argued the cause for the respondent Kuhn)
Louis F. Hoynes Jr. (argued the cause for respondents Feeney et al.)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
71-32
Petitioner: 
Flood
Respondent: 
Kuhn
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1972-1975)
Opinion: 
407 U.S. 258 (1972)
Argued: 
Monday, March 20, 1972
Decided: 
Monday, June 19, 1972
Issues: 
Economic Activity, Antitrust

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Flood v. Kuhn , 407 U.S. 258 (1972)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_71_32)
(last visited Monday, November 23, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Kuhn, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

Sort by Ideology

Wrote a regular concurrence
Burger
Wrote a dissent
Douglas
Voted with the minority, joined Douglas' dissent, joined Marshall's dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a dissent
Marshall
Wrote the majority opinion
Blackmun
Did not participate
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist

Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun