Gravel v. United States

Media Items
Gravel v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1
Get Adobe Flash Player
Gravel v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2
Get Adobe Flash Player
Gravel v. United States - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Sam J. Ervin, Jr. (Argued the cause for the Senate of the United States as amicus curiae)
Robert J. Reinstein (Argued the cause for Gravel)
William B. Saxbe (Argued the cause for the Senate of the United States as amicus curiae)
Charles L. Fishman (Argued the cause for Gravel)
Erwin N. Griswold (Argued the cause for the United States)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
71-1017
Petitioner: 
Gravel
Respondent: 
United States
Consolidation: 
United States v. Gravel, No. 71-1026
Decided By: 
Burger Court (1972-1975)
Opinion: 
408 U.S. 606 (1972)
Argued: 
April 19-20, 1972
Categories: 
witnesses, privileges and immunities, legislative policy, immunity, congress
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Gravel v. United States , 408 U.S. 606 (1972)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_71_1017)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1971, Senator Mike Gravel received a copy of the Pentagon Papers: a set of classified documents concerning U.S. involvement in the Vietnam war. Gravel then introduced the study, in its entirety, into the record of a Senate Subcommittee meeting. Gravel also arranged for the private publication of the papers by the Beacon Press. A federal grand jury subpoenaed Leonard Rodberg, one of Gravel's aides, to testify about his role in the acquisition and publication of the papers.

Question: 

Did the subpoena of Senator Gravel's aide violate the Speech and Debate Clause of Article I of the Constitution?

Conclusion: 

Yes. The Court held that because the work of aides was critical to the performance of legislative tasks and duties, they were nothing less than legislators' "alter egos" and thus immune from subpoenas by the Speech and Debate Clause. Aides were exempted from grand jury questioning so long as Senators invoked the privilege on their behalf. Moreover, the Court held that the protections of the Speech and Debate Clause did not extend beyond the legislative sphere, ruling that Senator Gravel's arrangements with the Beacon Press were not constitutionally protected.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Gravel, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Article 1, Section 6, Paragraph 1: Speech or Debate Clause

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Burger
Wrote a dissent, joined Brennan's dissent
Douglas
Wrote a dissent
Brennan
Wrote a dissent
Stewart
Wrote the majority opinion
White
Voted with the minority, joined Brennan's dissent
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist

Full Opinion by Justice Byron R. White

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court