The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Wednesday, February 23, 1972
Decision: Thursday, June 29, 1972
Issues: First Amendment, Miscellaneous

Advocates

Joseph J. Hurley (Argued the cause for the respondent)
E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
William Bradford Reynolds (Argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance)

Facts of the Case

Pappas, a television newsman and photographer working out of a Providence RI office of a New Bedford MA television station, was called to New Bedford to report on civil disorders involving fires and other turmoil. Pappas intended to cover a Black Panther news conference. Pappas was admitted inside the Panther headquarters after agreeing that he would not disclose anything he saw or heard. Pappas stayed for three hours. He did not write a story based on his experience. Pappas was later summoned before a grand jury but he refused to answer questions about events that took place inside Panther headquarters.

Question

Did the First Amendment's freedom of the press protect Pappas from appearing and testifying before the grand jury?

Conclusion

No. The Court found that requiring reporters to disclose confidential information to grand juries served a "compelling" and "paramount" state interest and did not violate the First Amendment. Justice White argued that since the cases involved no government intervention to impose prior restraint, and no command to publish sources or to disclose them indiscriminately, there was no constitutional violation. Because reporters receive information from sources in confidence does not privilege them to withhold that information during a government investigation; the average citizen is often forced to disclose information received in confidence when summoned to testify in court. Pappas must appear and give testimony.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Full Opinion: First Amendment, Miscellaneous: 5 - 4
Voted with the majority, joined White's opinion
Burger
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Douglas
Voted with the minority, joined Stewart's dissent
Brennan
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Stewart
Voted with the majority, authored an opinion
White
Voted with the minority, joined Stewart's dissent
Marshall
Voted with the majority, joined White's opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority, authored a concurrence
Powell
Voted with the majority, joined White's opinion
Rehnquist

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, In re Pappas, 408 U.S. 665 (1972),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_94/>
(last visited ).