The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, January 19, 1972
Decision: Monday, June 26, 1972
Issues: First Amendment, Protest Demonstrations
Categories: equal protection, fourteenth amendment, freedom of speech, labor

Advocates

Harvey J. Barnett (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Richard L. Curry (Argued the cause for the petitioners)

Facts of the Case

Chicago adopted an ordinance prohibiting picketing within 150 feet of a school during school hours; the law made an exception for peaceful labor picketing. Mosley had been picketing near a public high school; he was protesting "black discrimination." Mosley sought a declaration that the ordinance was unconstitutional.

Question

Does the Chicago ordinance violate the freedom of speech Clause of the First Amendment?

Conclusion

The exemption for labor picketing violated the equal protection clause. Government regulation of message content is presumed unconstitutional unless there are compelling justifications. And regulations that selectively exclude speakers from a public forum must undergo careful judicial examination to ensure the minimal degree of furthering an important government interest. Mosley fashions an important principle from the values of freedom and equality: equal freedom of expression.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Mosley, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Equal Protection
Voted with the majority
Douglas
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Powell
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a regular concurrence
Burger
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Police Dept. of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 (1972),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_87/>
(last visited ).