The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Monday, December 6, 1971
Reargument: Monday, February 28, 1972
Decision: Monday, June 12, 1972
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Right to Counsel
Categories: criminal, criminal procedure, right to counsel, sixth amendment

Advocates

Erwin N. Griswold (Argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae on the reargument urging reversal)
George R. Georgieff (Reargued the cause for the respondent)
Bruce S. Rogow (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
J. Michael Shea (Argued the cause for the petitioner pro hac vice)

Facts of the Case

Jon Argersinger was an indigent charged with carrying a concealed weapon, a misdemeanor in the State of Florida. The charge carried with it a maximum penalty of six months in jail and a $1,000 fine. During the bench trial in which he was convicted and sentenced to serve ninety days in jail, Argersinger was not represented by an attorney.

Question

Do the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee a right to counsel to defendants who are accused of committing misdemeanors?

Conclusion

In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) the Court found that the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments required states to provide an attorney to indigent defendants in cases involving serious crimes. In this case, a unanimous Court extended that right to cover defendants charged with misdemeanors who faced the possibility of a jail sentence. Justice Douglas's plurality opinion described the intricacies involved in misdemeanor charges and the danger that unrepresented defendants may fall victim to "assembly-line justice." Thus, in order to guarantee fairness in trials involving potential jail time, no matter how petty the charge, the Court found that the state was obligated to provide the accused with counsel.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Argersinger, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Right to Counsel
Wrote a special concurrence
Burger
Wrote the majority opinion, joined Brennan's concurrence
Douglas
Wrote a regular concurrence
Brennan
Voted with the majority, joined Brennan's concurrence
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a special concurrence
Powell
Voted with the majority, joined Powell's concurrence
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice William O. Douglas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_5015/>
(last visited ).