http://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/podcast U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) en The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_638/argument None Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79954 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_133/9_argument-%29 The petitioners were convicted of illegally passing national defense information to the Soviet Union; their cases were affirmed on appeal. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In a petition for rehearing, the petitioners claimed that the government had relied on illegally obtained eavesdropping evidence to convict. The Court granted a rehearing and in a per curiam opinion vacated the appellate court judgment and remanded the case to the federal trial court for a rehearing. The United States sought to modify the Supreme Court's order, urging that the eavesdropping evidence should be reviewed in camera by the trial judge who would then transmit only relevant evidence to the parties. The petitioners argued their opposition to the motion in the 1967 Term. The matter was reargued in the 1968 Term. Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79880 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_133/argument The petitioners were convicted of illegally passing national defense information to the Soviet Union; their cases were affirmed on appeal. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In a petition for rehearing, the petitioners claimed that the government had relied on illegally obtained eavesdropping evidence to convict. The Court granted a rehearing and in a per curiam opinion vacated the appellate court judgment and remanded the case to the federal trial court for a rehearing. The United States sought to modify the Supreme Court's order, urging that the eavesdropping evidence should be reviewed in camera by the trial judge who would then transmit only relevant evidence to the parties. The petitioners argued their opposition to the motion in the 1967 Term. The matter was reargued in the 1968 Term. Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79899 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_898/argument None Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79980 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_133/9_argument-%29 The petitioners were convicted of illegally passing national defense information to the Soviet Union; their cases were affirmed on appeal. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In a petition for rehearing, the petitioners claimed that the government had relied on illegally obtained eavesdropping evidence to convict. The Court granted a rehearing and in a per curiam opinion vacated the appellate court judgment and remanded the case to the federal trial court for a rehearing. The United States sought to modify the Supreme Court's order, urging that the eavesdropping evidence should be reviewed in camera by the trial judge who would then transmit only relevant evidence to the parties. The petitioners argued their opposition to the motion in the 1967 Term. The matter was reargued in the 1968 Term. Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 80496 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_174/argument None Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79904 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_133/reargument The petitioners were convicted of illegally passing national defense information to the Soviet Union; their cases were affirmed on appeal. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In a petition for rehearing, the petitioners claimed that the government had relied on illegally obtained eavesdropping evidence to convict. The Court granted a rehearing and in a per curiam opinion vacated the appellate court judgment and remanded the case to the federal trial court for a rehearing. The United States sought to modify the Supreme Court's order, urging that the eavesdropping evidence should be reviewed in camera by the trial judge who would then transmit only relevant evidence to the parties. The petitioners argued their opposition to the motion in the 1967 Term. The matter was reargued in the 1968 Term. Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79715 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/reargument-1 Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79714 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/reargument-2 Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79717 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/argument Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53884 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/argument-1 Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79879 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_823/argument None Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79975 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/reargument Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62310 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_673/argument None Tue, 30 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79957 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_611/argument None Tue, 30 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79972 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_635/argument None Tue, 30 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79953 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_891/argument None Mon, 29 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79979 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_800/argument-1 Mon, 29 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79877 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_800/argument-2 Mon, 29 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79878 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_844/argument None Thu, 25 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79976 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_1016/argument-1 None Wed, 24 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79835 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_1015/argument Witherspoon was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by a jury in Illinois. An Illinois statute provides grounds for the dismissal of any juror with "conscientious scruples" against capital punishment. At Witherspoon's trial, the prosecution eliminated nearly half of the prospective jurors with qualms about capital punishment. The prosecution did not find out if most of the jurors dismissed would necessarily vote against capital punishment. Witherspoon appealed, alleging that the dismissal of prospective jurors with qualms about capital punishment violated his Sixth Amendment right to an "impartial jury" and 14th Amendment right to due process. On appeal, the Illinois Supreme Court found that no constitutional violation took place. Wed, 24 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79895 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_1016/argument-2 None Wed, 24 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79836 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_797/argument-2 None Tue, 23 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79876 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_742/argument None Tue, 23 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79968 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_797/argument-1 None Tue, 23 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79875 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_949/argument None Tue, 23 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79982 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_660/argument A 1965 amendment to New York's Education Law required public school boards to lend textbooks to elementary and secondary school students enrolled in private and parochial schools. The Board of Education for New York Central School District No. 1, contending that the law violated the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment, filed suit against James Allen, Commissioner of Education, requesting a declaratory injunction to prevent enforcement of the statute. The trial court agreed with the board and found the statute unconstitutional. The Appellate Division reversed the ruling, finding that the boards lacked standing. On appeal, the New York Court of Appeals ruled the boards did have standing, but also found that, because the law's purpose was to benefit all students regardless of the type of school they attended, the law did not violate the First Amendment. Mon, 22 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79956 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_755/argument None Mon, 22 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79970 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_733/argument-1 None Mon, 22 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79873 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_733/argument-2 None Mon, 22 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79874 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_517/argument None Thu, 04 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79943 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_760/argument None Thu, 04 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79971 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_876/argument None Thu, 04 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79978 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_695/argument None Wed, 03 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79959 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_740/argument None Wed, 03 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79967 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_805/argument None Wed, 03 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79974 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_726/argument-1 None Tue, 02 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79871 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_701/argument None Tue, 02 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79961 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_726/argument-2 None Tue, 02 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79872 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_645/argument-2 Jones, a black man, charged that a real estate company in Missouri's St. Louis County refused to sell him a home in a particular neighborhood on account of his race. Mon, 01 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53893 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_645/argument-1 Jones, a black man, charged that a real estate company in Missouri's St. Louis County refused to sell him a home in a particular neighborhood on account of his race. Mon, 01 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53892 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_597/argument None Mon, 01 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79949 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_497/argument None Thu, 28 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79940 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_630/argument None Thu, 28 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79952 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_703/argument None Thu, 28 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79963 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_510/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79942 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_639/argument-2 None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79864 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_71/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79965 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_802/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79973 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_508/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79941 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_639/argument-1 None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79863 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_325/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79921 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_154/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79902 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_486/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79938 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_247/argument-1 None Mon, 25 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79845 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_247/argument-2 None Mon, 25 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79846 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_616/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79950 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_465/argument-e None Thu, 14 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 80365 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_478/argument None Thu, 14 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79935 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_482/argument None Thu, 14 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79937 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_465/argument-e None Thu, 14 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79886 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_618/argument None Wed, 13 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79951 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_363/argument-2 None Tue, 12 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79884 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_416/argument Florence Flast and a group of taxpayers challenged federal legislation that financed the purchase of secular textbooks for use in religious schools. Flast argued that such use of tax money violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. A district court held that the federal courts should defer when confronted with taxpayer suits directed against federal spending programs. Tue, 12 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53885 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_363/argument-1 None Tue, 12 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79883 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_70/argument None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79962 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_705/argument None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79964 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_445/argument None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79933 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_276/argument-1 None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79847 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_276/argument-2 None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79848 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_339/argument None Thu, 07 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79924 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_405/argument None Thu, 07 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79929 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_702/argument-1 None Wed, 06 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79869 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_702/argument-2 None Wed, 06 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79870 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_700/argument None Wed, 06 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79960 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_335/argument None Tue, 05 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79923 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_699/argument-1 None Tue, 05 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79867 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_699/argument-2 None Tue, 05 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79868 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_73/argument None Mon, 04 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79966 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_127/argument-1 None Mon, 04 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79839 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_309/argument None Mon, 04 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79919 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_127/argument-2 None Mon, 04 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79840 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_257/argument None Thu, 25 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79913 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_324/argument None Thu, 25 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79920 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_232/argument David O'Brien burned his draft card at a Boston courthouse. He said he was expressing his opposition to war. He was convicted under a federal law that made the destruction or mutilation of drafts card a crime. Wed, 24 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53889 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_65/argument None Wed, 24 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79955 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_178/argument-1 None Tue, 23 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79841 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_178/argument-2 None Tue, 23 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79842 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_60/argument-1 None Mon, 22 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79861 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_187/reargument None Mon, 22 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79838 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_60/argument-2 None Mon, 22 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79862 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_187/argument None Mon, 22 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79905 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_92/argument None Thu, 18 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79981 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_305/argument None Thu, 18 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79918 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_149/argument None Thu, 18 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79900 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_267/argument None Thu, 18 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79915 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_59/argument None Wed, 17 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79948 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_107/argument None Wed, 17 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79897 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_410/argument Gary Duncan, a black teenager in Louisiana, was found guilty of assaulting a white youth by allegedly slapping him on the elbow. Duncan was sentenced to 60 days in prison and fined $150. Duncan's request for a jury trial was denied. Wed, 17 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53890 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_52/argument-1 None Tue, 16 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79857 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_47/argument None Tue, 16 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79934 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_52/argument-2 None Tue, 16 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79858 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_219/argument None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79908 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_55/argument None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79946 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_56/argument-1 None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79885 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_237/argument None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79911 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_56/argument-2 None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79891 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_40/argument None Wed, 13 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79928 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_196/argument-2 None Tue, 12 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79844 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_67/argument Terry and two other men were observed by a plain clothes policeman in what the officer believed to be "casing a job, a stick-up." The officer stopped and frisked the three men, and found weapons on two of them. Terry was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon and sentenced to three years in jail. Tue, 12 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53886 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_196/argument-1 None Tue, 12 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79843 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_63/argument-1 After following Nelson Sibron for several hours, and observing him talking with several narcotics addicts, NYC police officer Anthony Martinez stopped Sibron and questioned him. When Martinez said: "You know what I am after," Sibron began reaching into his pocket. Simultaneously, Martinez thrust his hand into Sibron's pocket and pulled out several heroin envelopes. Following his arrest for drug trafficking, Sibron sought to suppress the heroin evidence as the product of an unconstitutional stop-and-frisk search. When the Criminal Court of New York City denied his motion, Sibron appealed but suffered adverse rulings in the New York State appellate courts. On appeal, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard Sibron's case together with a related case, Peters v. New York. John Peters appealed his arrest and conviction for intent to commit burglary after a stop-and-frisk search of his person revealed burglary tools. Mon, 11 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53887 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_63/argument-2 After following Nelson Sibron for several hours, and observing him talking with several narcotics addicts, NYC police officer Anthony Martinez stopped Sibron and questioned him. When Martinez said: "You know what I am after," Sibron began reaching into his pocket. Simultaneously, Martinez thrust his hand into Sibron's pocket and pulled out several heroin envelopes. Following his arrest for drug trafficking, Sibron sought to suppress the heroin evidence as the product of an unconstitutional stop-and-frisk search. When the Criminal Court of New York City denied his motion, Sibron appealed but suffered adverse rulings in the New York State appellate courts. On appeal, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard Sibron's case together with a related case, Peters v. New York. John Peters appealed his arrest and conviction for intent to commit burglary after a stop-and-frisk search of his person revealed burglary tools. Mon, 11 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53888 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_86/argument None Mon, 11 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79977 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_63/74_argument After following Nelson Sibron for several hours, and observing him talking with several narcotics addicts, NYC police officer Anthony Martinez stopped Sibron and questioned him. When Martinez said: "You know what I am after," Sibron began reaching into his pocket. Simultaneously, Martinez thrust his hand into Sibron's pocket and pulled out several heroin envelopes. Following his arrest for drug trafficking, Sibron sought to suppress the heroin evidence as the product of an unconstitutional stop-and-frisk search. When the Criminal Court of New York City denied his motion, Sibron appealed but suffered adverse rulings in the New York State appellate courts. On appeal, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard Sibron's case together with a related case, Peters v. New York. John Peters appealed his arrest and conviction for intent to commit burglary after a stop-and-frisk search of his person revealed burglary tools. Mon, 11 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62191 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_158/argument None Thu, 07 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79903 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_26/argument None Thu, 07 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79914 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_85/argument-e None Thu, 07 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79894 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_85/argument-e None Thu, 07 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80485 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument-3 None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79984 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument-4 None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79985 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument-1 None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79887 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80490 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument-2 None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79983 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_433/argument None Mon, 04 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79932 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_39/argument None Tue, 14 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79927 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_113/argument None Tue, 14 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79898 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_104/argument None Mon, 13 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79896 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_69/argument None Mon, 13 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79958 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_43/argument None Thu, 09 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79931 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_48/argument None Thu, 09 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79936 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_23/argument None Thu, 09 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79909 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_58/argument-2 None Wed, 08 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79860 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_57/argument None Wed, 08 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79947 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_49/argument None Wed, 08 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79939 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_58/argument-1 None Wed, 08 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79859 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_38/argument-1 None Tue, 07 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79855 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_38/argument-2 None Tue, 07 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79856 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_75/argument None Tue, 07 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79969 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_21/argument None Tue, 07 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79907 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_15/argument None Mon, 06 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79901 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_27/argument None Mon, 06 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79916 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_28/argument-1 None Mon, 06 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79849 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_28/argument-2 None Mon, 06 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79850 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_68/argument-e None Thu, 19 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79892 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_68/argument-e None Thu, 19 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80450 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_37/argument None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79926 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_66/argument-1 None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79865 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_53/argument None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79944 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_66/argument-2 None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79866 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_54/argument None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79945 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_36/argument-1 None Tue, 17 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79853 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_36/argument-2 None Tue, 17 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79854 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_33/argument None Tue, 17 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79922 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_35/argument Acting on a suspicion that Katz was transmitting gambling information over the phone to clients in other states, Federal agents attached an eavesdropping device to the outside of a public phone booth used by Katz. Based on recordings of his end of the conversations, Katz was convicted under an eight- count indictment for the illegal transmission of wagering information from Los Angeles to Boston and Miami. On appeal, Katz challanged his conviction arguing that the recordings could not be used as evidence against him. The Court of Appeals rejected this point, noting the absence of a physical intrusion into the phone booth itself. The Court granted certiorari. Tue, 17 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53891 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_25/argument None Mon, 16 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79912 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_31/argument-2 None Mon, 16 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79852 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_20/argument None Mon, 16 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79906 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_31/argument-1 None Mon, 16 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79851 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_29/argument None Thu, 12 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79917 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_34/argument None Thu, 12 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79925 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_16/argument None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80256 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_236/argument None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79910 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_16/argument-e None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80257 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_16/argument-1 None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79881 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_16/argument-2 None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79882 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_41/argument None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79930 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_13/argument-1 On October 12, 1964, Wainwright, a student at Tulane University Law School, was out walking around midnight. Two New Orleans Police Department officers stopped him because, in their opinion, he fitted the description of a man suspected of murder. Wainwright told the officers he had identification at home, but not on his person. The officers then asked Wainwright to remove this jacket so that they could search him for a tattoo that the suspected murdered had on his left arm. Wainwright ultimately refused to do so after trying to walk away and some mild verbal sparing. The officers then arrested him on a charge of vagrancy by loitering and frisked him. After Wainwright continued to refuse to remove his jacket at the police station, officers used force to remove it and discovered that he had no tattoo. Mon, 09 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53894 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9_orig/argument None Mon, 09 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79890 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_13/argument-2 On October 12, 1964, Wainwright, a student at Tulane University Law School, was out walking around midnight. Two New Orleans Police Department officers stopped him because, in their opinion, he fitted the description of a man suspected of murder. Wainwright told the officers he had identification at home, but not on his person. The officers then asked Wainwright to remove this jacket so that they could search him for a tattoo that the suspected murdered had on his left arm. Wainwright ultimately refused to do so after trying to walk away and some mild verbal sparing. The officers then arrested him on a charge of vagrancy by loitering and frisked him. After Wainwright continued to refuse to remove his jacket at the police station, officers used force to remove it and discovered that he had no tattoo. Mon, 09 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 62253 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_12/argument None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68408 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_12_2/reargument-2 None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79837 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_12_2/reargument-1 None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79888 at http://www.oyez.org