Cases - 1966 term

Thorpe v. Housing Authority

Tue, 21 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

712

Petitioner

Thorpe

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Housing Authority

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 670 (1967)

Argued

Tuesday, March 21, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 17, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Thorpe, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Woodwork Manufacturers v. NLRB

Wed, 18 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

110

Petitioner

Woodwork Manufacturers

Respondent

National Labor Relations Board

Consolidation

No. 111

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 612 (1967)

Argued

January 18-19, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 17, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for NLRB, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.

Tue, 14 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

214

Petitioner

Fleischmann Distilling Corp.

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Maier Brewing Co.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 714 (1967)

Argued

Tuesday, February 14, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 8, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Maier Brewing Co., 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 15 U.S.C. 1117

None

Neely v. Eby Construction Co.

Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Neely

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Eby Construction Co.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 317 (1967)

Argued

Monday, January 16, 1967

Decided

Monday, March 20, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Eby Construction Co., 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 7: Seventh Amendment

None

Marchetti v. United States

Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Marchetti

Respondent

United States

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1967-1969)

Opinion

390 U.S. 39 (1968)

Argued

January 17-18, 1967

Reargued:

Tuesday, October 10, 1967

Decided

Monday, January 29, 1968

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 7 votes for Marchetti, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Internal Revenue Code

None

Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking

Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Utah Pie Co.

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Continental Baking

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 685 (1967)

Argued

Tuesday, January 17, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 24, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Utah Pie Co., 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Clayton

None

First Nat. Bank v. Walker Bank

Mon, 07 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

First Nat. Bank

Respondent

Walker Bank

Consolidation

No. 73

No. 88

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 252 (1966)

Argued

November 7-8, 1966

Decided

Monday, December 12, 1966

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Walker Bank, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 12 U.S.C. 36

None

Toilet Goods Assn. v. Gardner

Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

336

Petitioner

Toilet Goods Assn.

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Gardner

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 158 (1967)

Argued

Monday, January 16, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 22, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 7 votes for Gardner, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic, and related statutes

None

Sailors v. Board Of Education

Mon, 17 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

430

Appellee

Board Of Education

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

Sailors

Respondent Type

Appellant

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 105 (1967)

Argued

Monday, April 17, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 22, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Board Of Education, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

None

American Trucking v. A., T. & S. F. R. Co.

Thu, 13 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

A., T. & S. F. R. Co.

Respondent

American Trucking

Consolidation

No. 59

No. 60

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 397 (1967)

Argued

Thursday, April 13, 1967, Monday, April 17, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 29, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for American Trucking, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Interstate Commerce, as amended

None

Mccray v. Illinois

Wed, 11 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

159

Petitioner

Mccray

Respondent

Illinois

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 300 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, January 11, 1967

Decided

Monday, March 20, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Illinois, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment

None

Commissioner v. Estate Of Bosch

Wed, 22 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

673

Petitioner

Commissioner

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Estate Of Bosch

Respondent Type

Respondent

Consolidation

No. 240

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 456 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, March 22, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 5, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Commissioner, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. Trainmen

Wed, 19 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

794

Petitioner

Denver & R. G. W. R. Co.

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Trainmen

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 556 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, April 19, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 5, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Denver & R. G. W. R. Co., 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 28 U.S.C. 1391

None

Waldron v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.

Mon, 13 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

233

Petitioner

Waldron

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 724 (1967)

Argued

Monday, March 13, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 8, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Waldron, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Dombrowski v. Eastland

Mon, 20 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

118

Petitioner

Dombrowski

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Eastland

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 82 (1967)

Argued

Monday, February 20, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 15, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Dombrowski, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Loving v. Virginia

Mon, 10 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Location

Virginia General Assembly

9th and Grace Street Richmond VA 23219

Richmond, VA 23219

United States

37° 32' 23.8416" N, 77° 26' 4.758" W

See map: Google Maps

Case Basics

Docket No.

395

Petitioner

Virginia

Respondent

Loving

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

388 U.S. 1 (1967)

Argued

Monday, April 10, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 12, 1967

Advocates

Bernard S. Cohen (Argued the cause for the appellants)

R. D. McIlwaine, III (Argued the cause for the appellee)

William M. Marutani (By special leave of Court, argued the cause for the Japanese American Citizens League, as amicus curiae, urging reversal)

Philip J. Hirschkop (Argued the cause for the appellants pro hac vice, by special leave of Court)

Facts of the Case

In 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia. The Lovings returned to Virginia shortly thereafter. The couple was then charged with violating the state's antimiscegenation statute, which banned inter-racial marriages. The Lovings were found guilty and sentenced to a year in jail (the trial judge agreed to suspend the sentence if the Lovings would leave Virginia and not return for 25 years).

Question

Did Virginia's antimiscegenation law violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Loving, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

Yes. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that distinctions drawn according to race were generally "odious to a free people" and were subject to "the most rigid scrutiny" under the Equal Protection Clause. The Virginia law, the Court found, had no legitimate purpose "independent of invidious racial discrimination." The Court rejected the state's argument that the statute was legitimate because it applied equally to both blacks and whites and found that racial classifications were not subject to a "rational purpose" test under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court also held that the Virginia law violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. "Under our Constitution," wrote Chief Justice Earl Warren, "the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the State."

Long v. District Court Of Iowa

Wed, 09 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Long

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

District Court Of Iowa

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 192 (1966)

Argued

Wednesday, November 9, 1966

Decided

Monday, December 5, 1966

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Long, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

None

Berger v. New York

Thu, 13 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

615

Petitioner

Berger

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

New York

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

388 U.S. 41 (1967)

Argued

Thursday, April 13, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 12, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Berger, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment

None

Moody v. Flowers

Tue, 18 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

624

Appellee

Flowers

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

Moody

Respondent Type

Appellant

Consolidation

No. 491

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 97 (1967)

Argued

Tuesday, April 18, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 22, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Moody, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn.

Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

438

Petitioner

Gardner

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Toilet Goods Assn.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 167 (1967)

Argued

Monday, January 16, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 22, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Toilet Goods Assn., 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic, and related statutes

None

Houston Contractors Assn. v. NLRB

Thu, 19 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

206

Petitioner

Houston Contractors Assn.

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

National Labor Relations Board

Respondent Type

Respondent

Consolidation

No. 413

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 664 (1967)

Argued

Thursday, January 19, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 17, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for NLRB, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Illinois C. R. Co. v. Norfolk & W. R. Co.

Tue, 11 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Norfolk & W. R. Co.

Respondent

Illinois C. R. Co.

Consolidation

No. 17

No. 20

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 57 (1966)

Argued

Tuesday, October 11, 1966

Decided

Monday, November 14, 1966

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Illinois C. R. Co., 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Clewis v. Texas

Wed, 15 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

648

Petitioner

Clewis

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Texas

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 707 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, March 15, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 24, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Texas, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Due Process

None

Chapman v. California

Wed, 07 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Chapman

Respondent

California

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 18 (1967)

Argued

December 7-8, 1966

Decided

Monday, February 20, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Chapman, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: harmless error

None

Parker v. Gladden

Wed, 09 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Parker

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Gladden

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 363 (1966)

Argued

Wednesday, November 9, 1966

Decided

Monday, December 12, 1966

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Parker, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 6: Other Sixth Amendment Provisions

None

Boutilier v. Immigration Service

Tue, 14 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

440

Petitioner

Boutilier

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Immigration Service

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 118 (1967)

Argued

Tuesday, March 14, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 22, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Immigration Service, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended

None

Walker v. Birmingham

Mon, 13 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Location

Birmingham City Council

710 North 20th Street Birmingham AL 35203

Birmingham, AL 35203

United States

33° 31' 12.0936" N, 86° 48' 39.1284" W

See map: Google Maps

Case Basics

Docket No.

249

Petitioner

Walker

Respondent

Birmingham

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

388 U.S. 307 (1967)

Argued

March 13-14, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 12, 1967

Advocates

Louis F. Claiborne (By special leave of the Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal)

J. M. Breckenridge (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Earl McBee (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Jack Greenberg (Argued the cause for the petitioners)

Facts of the Case

Civil rights activists who planned to march on Good Friday and Easter were denied parade permits from the city. When they indicated their intention to march anyway, Birmingham obtained an injunction from a state court which ordered them to refrain from demonstrating. Marchers who defied the order, including Martin Luther King, Jr. and Ralph Abernathy, were arrested.

Question

Did the injunction violate the First Amendment?

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Birmingham, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

The Court upheld the arrests since Walker failed to use proper judicial procedures to test the injunction's validity. Even though, Justice Stewart admitted, the injunction seemed broad and vague, and the marchers may not have enjoyed due process when applying for the permit originally, simply disobeying the injunction was illegitimate as "no man can be judge in his own case . . . however righteous his motives."

NLRB v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.

Wed, 15 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

216

Petitioner

National Labor Relations Board

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

388 U.S. 175 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, March 15, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 12, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for NLRB, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Berenyi v. Immigration Director

Mon, 05 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Berenyi

Respondent

Immigration Director

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 630 (1967)

Argued

December 5-6, 1966

Decided

Monday, January 23, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Immigration Director, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended

None

Redrup v. New York

Mon, 10 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Redrup

Respondent

New York

Consolidation

No. 16

No. 50

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 767 (1967)

Argued

October 10-11, 1966

Decided

Monday, May 8, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 7 votes for Redrup, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

None

United States v. Fabrizio

Mon, 07 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Appellee

Fabrizio

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

United States

Respondent Type

Appellant

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 263 (1966)

Argued

Monday, November 7, 1966

Decided

Monday, December 12, 1966

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 7 votes for United States, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 18 U.S.C. 1953

None

Prima Paint v. Flood & Conklin

Thu, 16 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

343

Petitioner

Prima Paint

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Flood & Conklin

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

388 U.S. 395 (1967)

Argued

Thursday, March 16, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 12, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Flood & Conklin, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 9 U.S.C. 1

None

Warden v. Hayden

Wed, 12 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

480

Petitioner

Warden

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Hayden

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 294 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, April 12, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 29, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Warden, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment

None

Commissioner v. Stidger

Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

173

Petitioner

Commissioner

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Stidger

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 287 (1967)

Argued

Monday, January 16, 1967

Decided

Monday, March 20, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Commissioner, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Internal Revenue Code

None

FPC v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.

Wed, 11 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

127

Petitioner

Federal Power Commission

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

United Gas Pipe Line Co.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Consolidation

No. 128

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 237 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, January 11, 1967

Decided

Monday, March 13, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for FPC, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Natural Gas, or Natural Gas Policy Acts

None

Keyishian v. Board Of Regents

Thu, 17 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

105

Appellee

Board Of Regents

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

Keyishian

Respondent Type

Appellant

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 589 (1967)

Argued

Thursday, November 17, 1966

Decided

Monday, January 23, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Keyishian, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

None

Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. A., T. & S. F. R. Co.

Wed, 19 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Appellee

A., T. & S. F. R. Co.

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

Chicago & N. W. R. Co.

Respondent Type

Appellant

Consolidation

No. 23

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 326 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, April 19, 1967

Decided

Monday, May 29, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Honda v. Clark

Tue, 14 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

164

Petitioner

Honda

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Clark

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 484 (1967)

Argued

Tuesday, February 14, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 10, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Honda, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 50 U.S.C. 34

None

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Tashire

Tue, 14 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

391

Petitioner

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

Respondent

Tashire

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 523 (1967)

Argued

February 14-15, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 10, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 28 U.S.C. 1335

None

Immigration Service v. Errico

Thu, 20 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Immigration Service

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Errico

Respondent Type

Respondent

Consolidation

No. 91

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 214 (1966)

Argued

Thursday, October 20, 1966

Decided

Monday, December 12, 1966

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Errico, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended

None

United States v. Wade

Thu, 16 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

334

Petitioner

United States

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Wade

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

388 U.S. 218 (1967)

Argued

Thursday, February 16, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 12, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Wade, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Self-Incrimination

None

Udall v. FPC

Tue, 11 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

463

Petitioner

Udall

Respondent

Federal Power Commission

Consolidation

No. 462

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

387 U.S. 428 (1967)

Argued

April 11-12, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 5, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Udall, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Federal Power

None

Cascade Nat. Gas v. El Paso Nat. Gas

Thu, 12 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

El Paso Nat. Gas

Respondent

Cascade Nat. Gas

Consolidation

No. 5

No. 24

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 129 (1967)

Argued

Thursday, January 12, 1967

Decided

Monday, February 27, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Cascade Nat. Gas, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Bond v. Floyd

Thu, 10 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Appellee

Floyd

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

Bond

Respondent Type

Appellant

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 116 (1966)

Argued

Thursday, November 10, 1966

Decided

Monday, December 5, 1966

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Bond, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

None

Grosso v. United States

Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Grosso

Respondent

United States

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1967-1969)

Opinion

390 U.S. 62 (1968)

Argued

January 17-18, 1967

Reargued:

October 10-11, 1967

Decided

Monday, January 29, 1968

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 7 votes for Grosso, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Internal Revenue Code

None

United States v. Demko

Tue, 08 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

United States

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Demko

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 149 (1966)

Argued

Tuesday, November 8, 1966

Decided

Monday, December 5, 1966

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 7 votes for United States, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 18 U.S.C. 4126

None

United States v. Laub

Wed, 16 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

176

Appellee

Laub

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

United States

Respondent Type

Appellant

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 475 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, November 16, 1966

Decided

Tuesday, January 10, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Laub, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended

None

NLRB v. Great Dane Trailers

Wed, 19 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

781

Petitioner

National Labor Relations Board

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Great Dane Trailers

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

388 U.S. 26 (1967)

Argued

Wednesday, April 19, 1967

Decided

Monday, June 12, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 7 votes for NLRB, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

United States v. Robel

Mon, 14 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Appellee

Robel

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

United States

Respondent Type

Appellant

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1967-1969)

Opinion

389 U.S. 258 (1967)

Argued

Monday, November 14, 1966

Reargued:

Monday, October 9, 1967

Decided

Monday, December 11, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Robel, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Smith, Subversive Activities Control, Communist Control, or other similar federal legislation except the Internal Security Act (qv.)

None

Railroad Trans. Service v. Chicago

Mon, 13 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

209

Petitioner

Railroad Trans. Service

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Chicago

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 351 (1967)

Argued

Monday, February 13, 1967

Decided

Monday, March 27, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Railroad Trans. Service, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None