http://www.oyez.org/cases/1963/podcast U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) en The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_503/argument-1 None Thu, 30 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86213 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_503/argument-2 None Thu, 30 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86214 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_210/argument None Thu, 30 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86126 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_615/argument-1 Danny Escobedo was arrested and taken to a police station for questioning. Over several hours, the police refused his repeated requests to see his lawyer. Escobedo's lawyer sought unsuccessfully to consult with his client. Escobedo subsequently confessed to murder. Wed, 29 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86237 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_490/489_argument None Wed, 29 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86208 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_615/argument-2 Danny Escobedo was arrested and taken to a police station for questioning. Over several hours, the police refused his repeated requests to see his lawyer. Escobedo's lawyer sought unsuccessfully to consult with his client. Escobedo subsequently confessed to murder. Wed, 29 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86238 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_490/argument None Wed, 29 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86209 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_485/argument None Wed, 29 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86207 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_406/argument None Tue, 28 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86187 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_367/argument-1 None Tue, 28 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86172 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_367/argument-2 None Tue, 28 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86173 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_470/argument None Tue, 28 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86202 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_481/argument-1 None Mon, 27 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86203 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_481/argument-2 None Mon, 27 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86204 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_294/argument None Mon, 27 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86151 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_201/argument-2 None Thu, 23 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86119 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_204/argument None Thu, 23 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86124 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_201/argument-1 None Thu, 23 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86118 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_4/argument None Wed, 22 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86188 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_402/argument-1 None Wed, 22 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86185 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_336/argument-1 None Wed, 22 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86163 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_264/argument None Wed, 22 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86141 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_402/argument-2 None Wed, 22 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86186 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_336/argument-2 None Wed, 22 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86164 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_509/argument None Tue, 21 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86217 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_461/argument-1 None Tue, 21 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86197 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_461/argument-2 None Tue, 21 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86198 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_328/argument-2 None Mon, 20 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86161 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_185/argument-1 None Mon, 20 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86114 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_328/argument-1 None Mon, 20 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86160 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_185/argument-2 None Mon, 20 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86115 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_253/argument None Thu, 02 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86139 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_368/argument None Thu, 02 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86174 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_449/argument-1 None Wed, 01 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86195 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_449/argument-2 None Wed, 01 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86196 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_508/argument-2 Acting on behalf of several voters in the Denver area, Andres Lucas sued various officials connected with Colorado's elections challenging the apportionment of seats in both houses of the Colorado General Assembly. Under Colorado's apportionment plan, the House of Representatives was apportioned on the basis of population but the apportionment of the Senate was based on a combination of population and other factors (geography, compactness and contiguity, accessibility, natural boundaries, and conformity to historical divisions). Consequently, counties with only about one-third of the State's total population would elect a majority of the Senate; the maximum population- variance ratio would be about 3.6-to-1; and the chief metropolitan areas, with over two-thirds of the State's population, could elect only a bare majority of the Senate. When a three-judge District Court upheld the plan, stressing its recent approval by the electorate, the Supreme Court granted Lucas certiorari. Tue, 31 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86216 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_623/argument-1 None Tue, 31 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86242 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_623/argument-2 None Tue, 31 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86243 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_508/argument-1 Acting on behalf of several voters in the Denver area, Andres Lucas sued various officials connected with Colorado's elections challenging the apportionment of seats in both houses of the Colorado General Assembly. Under Colorado's apportionment plan, the House of Representatives was apportioned on the basis of population but the apportionment of the Senate was based on a combination of population and other factors (geography, compactness and contiguity, accessibility, natural boundaries, and conformity to historical divisions). Consequently, counties with only about one-third of the State's total population would elect a majority of the Senate; the maximum population- variance ratio would be about 3.6-to-1; and the chief metropolitan areas, with over two-thirds of the State's population, could elect only a bare majority of the Senate. When a three-judge District Court upheld the plan, stressing its recent approval by the electorate, the Supreme Court granted Lucas certiorari. Tue, 31 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86215 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_592/argument-2 None Mon, 30 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86234 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_592/argument-1 None Mon, 30 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86233 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_245/argument None Thu, 26 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86137 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_572/argument None Thu, 26 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86229 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_548/argument-1 None Wed, 25 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86224 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_386/argument-1 None Wed, 25 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86180 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_583/argument None Wed, 25 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86232 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_548/argument-2 None Wed, 25 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86225 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_386/argument-2 None Wed, 25 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86181 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_169/argument-2 None Tue, 24 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86112 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_220/argument None Tue, 24 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86130 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_169/argument-1 None Tue, 24 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86111 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_384/argument-2 None Mon, 23 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86179 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_116/argument-1 None Mon, 23 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86095 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_116/argument-2 None Mon, 23 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86096 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_384/argument-1 None Mon, 23 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86178 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_389/argument None Mon, 23 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86183 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_353/argument None Thu, 05 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86168 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_110/argument William Malloy was arrested during a gambling raid in 1959 by Hartford, Connecticut police. After pleading guilty to pool selling, a misdemeanor, he was sentenced to one year in jail and fined $500, but the sentence was suspended after 90 days and Malloy was placed on two years probation. Some 16 months following his plea, a Superior Court appointed referee ordered Malloy to testify about gambling and other criminal activities in Hartford County. When Malloy refused, "on grounds it may tend to incriminate [him]" he was imprisoned for contempt and held until willing to answer questions. Malloy filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his confinement. On appeal from the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors ruling, upholding an adverse Superior Court denial, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Thu, 05 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86087 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_138/argument None Thu, 05 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86100 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_361/argument None Wed, 04 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86169 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_329/argument None Wed, 04 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86162 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_36/argument-1 None Wed, 04 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86170 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_36/argument-2 None Wed, 04 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86171 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_292/argument None Tue, 03 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86150 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_199/argument None Tue, 03 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86117 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_423/argument None Tue, 03 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86190 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_287/argument None Mon, 02 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86146 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_273/argument-2 None Mon, 02 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86143 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_273/argument-1 None Mon, 02 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86142 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_235/argument None Thu, 27 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86136 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_223/argument None Thu, 27 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86133 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_168/argument None Thu, 27 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86110 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_115/argument-2 None Wed, 26 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86094 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_157/argument-1 None Wed, 26 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86103 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_115/argument-1 None Wed, 26 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86093 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_157/argument-2 None Wed, 26 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86104 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_94/argument-2 None Tue, 25 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86282 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_209/argument None Tue, 25 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86125 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_163/argument Not available Tue, 25 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86108 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_94/argument-1 None Tue, 25 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86281 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_167/argument None Mon, 24 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86109 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_137/argument None Mon, 24 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86099 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_102/argument None Thu, 20 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86080 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_100/argument None Thu, 20 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86078 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_109/argument None Thu, 20 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86086 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_89/argument None Wed, 19 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86274 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_111/argument-1 None Wed, 19 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86088 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_111/argument-2 None Wed, 19 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86089 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_88/argument-2 None Tue, 18 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86273 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_58/argument-1 None Tue, 18 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86230 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_58/argument-2 None Tue, 18 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86231 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_88/argument-1 None Tue, 18 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86272 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_101/argument None Tue, 18 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86079 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_77/argument-1 None Mon, 17 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86258 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_75/argument None Mon, 17 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86255 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_77/argument-2 None Mon, 17 Feb 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86259 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_108/argument-1 None Thu, 16 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86084 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_106/argument None Thu, 16 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86081 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_108/argument-2 None Thu, 16 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86085 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_92/argument None Thu, 16 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86280 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_76/argument-2 None Wed, 15 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86257 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_87/argument-1 None Wed, 15 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86270 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_87/argument-2 None Wed, 15 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86271 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_76/argument-1 None Wed, 15 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86256 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_74/argument-2 None Tue, 14 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86254 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_71/argument None Tue, 14 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86250 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_74/argument-1 None Tue, 14 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86252 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_34/argument-1 None Mon, 13 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86165 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_65/argument-2 None Mon, 13 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86246 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_34/argument-2 None Mon, 13 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86166 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_65/79_argument None Mon, 13 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86261 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_65/argument-1 None Mon, 13 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86245 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_113/argument-1 None Thu, 09 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86091 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_113/argument-2 None Thu, 09 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86092 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_91/argument-1 None Thu, 09 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86275 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_91/argument-2 None Thu, 09 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86276 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_56/argument-1 None Wed, 08 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86227 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_56/argument-2 None Wed, 08 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86228 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_82/argument-1 None Wed, 08 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86263 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_66/argument None Wed, 08 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86247 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_82/argument-2 None Wed, 08 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86264 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_53/argument-1 None Tue, 07 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86220 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_53/argument-2 None Tue, 07 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86221 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_48/argument None Tue, 07 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86205 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_49/argument None Tue, 07 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86210 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_39/argument Decided together with Abernathy v. Sullivan, this case concerns a full-page ad in the New York Times which alleged that the arrest of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. for perjury in Alabama was part of a campaign to destroy King's efforts to integrate public facilities and encourage blacks to vote. L. B. Sullivan, the Montgomery city commissioner, filed a libel action against the newspaper and four black ministers who were listed as endorsers of the ad, claiming that the allegations against the Montgomery police defamed him personally. Under Alabama law, Sullivan did not have to prove that he had been harmed; and a defense claiming that the ad was truthful was unavailable since the ad contained factual errors. Sullivan won a $500,000 judgment. Mon, 06 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86184 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_39/40_argument Decided together with Abernathy v. Sullivan, this case concerns a full-page ad in the New York Times which alleged that the arrest of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. for perjury in Alabama was part of a campaign to destroy King's efforts to integrate public facilities and encourage blacks to vote. L. B. Sullivan, the Montgomery city commissioner, filed a libel action against the newspaper and four black ministers who were listed as endorsers of the ad, claiming that the allegations against the Montgomery police defamed him personally. Under Alabama law, Sullivan did not have to prove that he had been harmed; and a defense claiming that the ad was truthful was unavailable since the ad contained factual errors. Sullivan won a $500,000 judgment. Mon, 06 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62187 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_64/argument None Mon, 06 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 86244 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_83/argument None Thu, 12 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86266 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_119/argument None Thu, 12 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86097 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_21/argument-1 None Wed, 11 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86127 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_21/argument-2 None Wed, 11 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86128 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_26/argument None Wed, 11 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86140 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_14_orig/argument-1 None Tue, 10 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86101 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_30/argument-2 None Tue, 10 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86153 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_14_orig/argument-2 None Tue, 10 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86102 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_30/argument-1 None Tue, 10 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86152 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_307/argument-1 Following the Supreme Court's decision in Baker v. Carr (369 U.S. 186) Richard Sincock and several other New Castle County residents, taxpayers, and qualified voters, challenged the constitutionality of Delaware's apportionment scheme. The suit alleged that under Delaware's 1897 state constitution, no provisions existed for reapportionment that would reflect the changing demographic face of New Castle County and the City of Wilmington. On a appeal from a three-judge district court ruling against the state of Delaware, the Supreme Court granted Mabel Roman, Delaware's elections clerk, certiorari. Mon, 09 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86154 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_62/argument-1 None Mon, 09 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86239 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_307/argument-2 Following the Supreme Court's decision in Baker v. Carr (369 U.S. 186) Richard Sincock and several other New Castle County residents, taxpayers, and qualified voters, challenged the constitutionality of Delaware's apportionment scheme. The suit alleged that under Delaware's 1897 state constitution, no provisions existed for reapportionment that would reflect the changing demographic face of New Castle County and the City of Wilmington. On a appeal from a three-judge district court ruling against the state of Delaware, the Supreme Court granted Mabel Roman, Delaware's elections clerk, certiorari. Mon, 09 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86155 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_62/argument-2 None Mon, 09 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86241 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_43/argument None Thu, 21 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86192 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_84/argument-1 None Thu, 21 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86267 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_84/argument-2 None Thu, 21 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86268 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_112/argument None Thu, 21 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86090 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_81/argument None Wed, 20 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86262 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_38/argument-1 None Wed, 20 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86176 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_38/argument-2 None Wed, 20 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86177 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_51/argument-1 None Wed, 20 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86218 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_51/argument-2 None Wed, 20 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86219 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_46/argument-1 None Tue, 19 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86200 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_46/argument-2 None Tue, 19 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86201 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_96/argument-1 None Tue, 19 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86283 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_96/argument-2 None Tue, 19 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86284 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_25/argument None Tue, 19 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86138 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_22/argument-2 James P. Wesberry, Jr. filed a suit against the Governor of Georgia, Carl E. Sanders, protesting the state's apportionment scheme. The Fifth Congressional District, of which Wesberry was a member, had a population two to three times larger than some of the other districts in the state. Wesberry claimed this system diluted his right to vote compared to other Georgia residents. Mon, 18 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86132 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_22/argument-1 James P. Wesberry, Jr. filed a suit against the Governor of Georgia, Carl E. Sanders, protesting the state's apportionment scheme. The Fifth Congressional District, of which Wesberry was a member, had a population two to three times larger than some of the other districts in the state. Wesberry claimed this system diluted his right to vote compared to other Georgia residents. Mon, 18 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86131 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_69/argument-2 Acting on behalf of residents, taxpayers, and qualified voters in Arlington and Fairfax County, Virginia, Harrison Mann challenged Virginia's 1962 amended statutory apportionment scheme as unrepresentative. Harrison called for a redistribution of legislative representation among the counties and independent cities of the state "substantially in proportion to their respective populations." When Levin Davis appealed an adverse three-judge district court ruling on behalf of Virginia's Secretary and State Board of Elections, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Thu, 14 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86249 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_69/argument-1 Acting on behalf of residents, taxpayers, and qualified voters in Arlington and Fairfax County, Virginia, Harrison Mann challenged Virginia's 1962 amended statutory apportionment scheme as unrepresentative. Harrison called for a redistribution of legislative representation among the counties and independent cities of the state "substantially in proportion to their respective populations." When Levin Davis appealed an adverse three-judge district court ruling on behalf of Virginia's Secretary and State Board of Elections, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Thu, 14 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86248 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_23/argument-2 In 1961, M.O. Sims, David J. Vann (Vann v. Baggett), John McConnell (McConnell v. Baggett), and other voters from Jefferson County, Alabama, challenged the apportionment of the state legislature. The Alabama Constitution prescribed that each county was entitled to at least one representative and that there were to be as many senatorial districts as there were senators. Population variance ratios of as great as 41-to-1 existed in the Senate. Wed, 13 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86135 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_29/argument-1 Under its 1867 Constitution, the State of Maryland's Senate has 29 seats, one for each of 23 counties and six for the City of Baltimore's legislative districts. The State's five most populous political subdivisions with over three-fourths of the 1960 population are represented by only slightly over one-third of the Senate's membership. In the House of Delegates, after temporary legislation in 1962, there existed a maximum population-variance ratio of almost 6-to-1. A group of residents, taxpayers, and voters brought suit, alleging that the legislative malapportionment violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ultimately, the circuit court held that as to certain counties there was invidious discrimination in the apportionment of the House and that the senatorial apportionment was constitutional. The Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed. Wed, 13 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86147 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_29/argument-2 Under its 1867 Constitution, the State of Maryland's Senate has 29 seats, one for each of 23 counties and six for the City of Baltimore's legislative districts. The State's five most populous political subdivisions with over three-fourths of the 1960 population are represented by only slightly over one-third of the Senate's membership. In the House of Delegates, after temporary legislation in 1962, there existed a maximum population-variance ratio of almost 6-to-1. A group of residents, taxpayers, and voters brought suit, alleging that the legislative malapportionment violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ultimately, the circuit court held that as to certain counties there was invidious discrimination in the apportionment of the House and that the senatorial apportionment was constitutional. The Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed. Wed, 13 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86148 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_23/argument-1 In 1961, M.O. Sims, David J. Vann (Vann v. Baggett), John McConnell (McConnell v. Baggett), and other voters from Jefferson County, Alabama, challenged the apportionment of the state legislature. The Alabama Constitution prescribed that each county was entitled to at least one representative and that there were to be as many senatorial districts as there were senators. Population variance ratios of as great as 41-to-1 existed in the Senate. Wed, 13 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86134 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_29/argument-3 Under its 1867 Constitution, the State of Maryland's Senate has 29 seats, one for each of 23 counties and six for the City of Baltimore's legislative districts. The State's five most populous political subdivisions with over three-fourths of the 1960 population are represented by only slightly over one-third of the Senate's membership. In the House of Delegates, after temporary legislation in 1962, there existed a maximum population-variance ratio of almost 6-to-1. A group of residents, taxpayers, and voters brought suit, alleging that the legislative malapportionment violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ultimately, the circuit court held that as to certain counties there was invidious discrimination in the apportionment of the House and that the senatorial apportionment was constitutional. The Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed. Wed, 13 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86149 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_20/argument-1 The WMCA, acting on behalf of several New York City registered voters, challenged the constitutionality of Article III, Sections 2-5 of the New York State constitution alleging that its apportionment formula resulted in unfair weighting of both state legislature houses by favoring lesser populated rural areas over densely populated urban centers. On appeal from a dismissal of their complaint by a three-judge district court, the Supreme Court granted the WMCA certiorari. Tue, 12 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86120 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_20/argument-2 The WMCA, acting on behalf of several New York City registered voters, challenged the constitutionality of Article III, Sections 2-5 of the New York State constitution alleging that its apportionment formula resulted in unfair weighting of both state legislature houses by favoring lesser populated rural areas over densely populated urban centers. On appeal from a dismissal of their complaint by a three-judge district court, the Supreme Court granted the WMCA certiorari. Tue, 12 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86121 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_20/argument-3 The WMCA, acting on behalf of several New York City registered voters, challenged the constitutionality of Article III, Sections 2-5 of the New York State constitution alleging that its apportionment formula resulted in unfair weighting of both state legislature houses by favoring lesser populated rural areas over densely populated urban centers. On appeal from a dismissal of their complaint by a three-judge district court, the Supreme Court granted the WMCA certiorari. Tue, 12 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86123 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_61/argument None Thu, 24 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86236 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_55/argument None Thu, 24 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86226 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_37/argument None Thu, 24 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86175 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_50/argument None Thu, 24 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86211 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_54/argument-2 None Wed, 23 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86223 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_32/argument None Wed, 23 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86159 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_35/argument None Wed, 23 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86167 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_54/argument-1 None Wed, 23 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86222 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_16/argument-1 None Tue, 22 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86105 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_16/argument-2 None Tue, 22 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86106 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_16/argument-3 None Tue, 22 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86107 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_44/argument-1 None Mon, 21 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86193 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_42/argument None Mon, 21 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86189 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_107/argument-1 None Mon, 21 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86082 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_44/argument-2 None Mon, 21 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86194 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_107/argument-2 None Mon, 21 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86083 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_31/argument-2 None Thu, 17 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86158 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_28/argument-1 None Thu, 17 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86144 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_28/argument-2 None Thu, 17 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86145 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_86/argument None Thu, 17 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86269 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_31/argument-1 None Thu, 17 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86156 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_19/argument None Wed, 16 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86116 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_17/argument None Wed, 16 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86113 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_60/argument None Tue, 15 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86235 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_7/argument None Tue, 15 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86251 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_9/argument-1 None Mon, 14 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86277 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_12/argument None Mon, 14 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86098 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_9/argument-2 None Mon, 14 Oct 1963 13:00:00 +0000 86279 at http://www.oyez.org