1960-1969 Term Arguments

1960-1969 Term Arguments http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/podcast U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) en The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent United States v. Armour & Company - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/1960-1969/1969/1969_103/argument None Tue, 05 May 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63540 at http://www.oyez.org Dyson v. Stein - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_41_2/argument None Thu, 30 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63522 at http://www.oyez.org Dyson v. Stein - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_41_2/reargument None Thu, 30 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63307 at http://www.oyez.org Byrne v. Karalexis - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_83/argument None Thu, 30 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63449 at http://www.oyez.org Byrne v. Karalexis - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_83/reargument None Thu, 30 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63309 at http://www.oyez.org In Re Spencer - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_513/argument None Tue, 28 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63483 at http://www.oyez.org U.S. v. Phillipsburg Nat. Bank - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_1093/argument None Tue, 28 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63510 at http://www.oyez.org Chambers v. Maroney - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_830/argument None Mon, 27 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63490 at http://www.oyez.org Wyman v. Rothstein - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_896/argument-2 None Mon, 27 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63443 at http://www.oyez.org Wyman v. Rothstein - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_896/argument-1 None Mon, 27 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63550 at http://www.oyez.org Price v. Georgia - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_269/argument None Mon, 27 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63467 at http://www.oyez.org Moon v. Maryland - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_267/argument None Wed, 22 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63501 at http://www.oyez.org Williams v. Illinois - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_1089/argument None Wed, 22 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63499 at http://www.oyez.org Morris v. Schoonfield - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_782/argument None Wed, 22 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63438 at http://www.oyez.org Mitchell v. Donovan - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_726/argument None Tue, 21 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63450 at http://www.oyez.org Boys Markets v. Clerks Union - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_768/argument-2 None Tue, 21 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63436 at http://www.oyez.org Boys Markets v. Clerks Union - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_768/argument-1 None Tue, 21 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63560 at http://www.oyez.org Nash v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_678/argument None Tue, 21 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63433 at http://www.oyez.org Hellenic Lines v. Rhoditis - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_661/argument None Tue, 21 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63496 at http://www.oyez.org Mulloy v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_655/argument None Mon, 20 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63497 at http://www.oyez.org California v. Green - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_387/argument None Mon, 20 Apr 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63527 at http://www.oyez.org Phoenix v. Kolodziejski - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_1066/argument None Tue, 31 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63444 at http://www.oyez.org Schacht v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_628/argument None Tue, 31 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63452 at http://www.oyez.org Nelson v. George - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_595/argument None Tue, 31 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63489 at http://www.oyez.org New Haven Inclusion Cases - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_915/argument None Mon, 30 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63558 at http://www.oyez.org Vale v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_727/argument-2 None Wed, 04 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63535 at http://www.oyez.org Moragne v. States Marine Lines - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_175/argument None Wed, 04 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63521 at http://www.oyez.org Vale v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_727/argument-1 None Wed, 04 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63459 at http://www.oyez.org Williams v. Florida - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_927/argument In 1967, the state of Florida passed legislation to allow six-member juries in criminal cases. Johnny Williams was tried and convicted for robbery by such a jury. Williams, lost in a Florida appellate court; he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Wed, 04 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63512 at http://www.oyez.org Sears, Roebuck v. Carpet Layers - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_476/argument None Tue, 03 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63542 at http://www.oyez.org Lewis v. Martin - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_829/argument-1 None Tue, 03 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63561 at http://www.oyez.org Lewis v. Martin - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_829/argument-2 None Tue, 03 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63486 at http://www.oyez.org Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Engineers - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_477/argument-2 None Mon, 02 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63518 at http://www.oyez.org Standard Industries, Inc. v. Tigrett Industries, Inc. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_445/argument None Mon, 02 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63485 at http://www.oyez.org Bachellar v. Maryland - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_729/argument None Mon, 02 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63471 at http://www.oyez.org Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Engineers - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_477/argument-1 None Mon, 02 Mar 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63493 at http://www.oyez.org Woodward v. Commissioner - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_412/argument None Thu, 26 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63524 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Hilton Hotels - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_528/argument None Thu, 26 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63458 at http://www.oyez.org Monks v. New Jersey - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_127/argument None Thu, 26 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63462 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Raytheon Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_440/argument None Thu, 26 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63456 at http://www.oyez.org American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_369/argument None Wed, 25 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63466 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Van Leeuwen - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_403/argument None Wed, 25 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63515 at http://www.oyez.org Greenbelt Pub. Assn. v. Bresler - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_413/argument-1 None Tue, 24 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63531 at http://www.oyez.org Illinois v. Allen - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_606/argument None Tue, 24 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63491 at http://www.oyez.org Mcmann v. Richardson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_153/argument None Tue, 24 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63543 at http://www.oyez.org Greenbelt Pub. Assn. v. Bresler - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_413/argument-2 None Tue, 24 Feb 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63474 at http://www.oyez.org Evans v. Cornman - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_236/argument None Thu, 22 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63488 at http://www.oyez.org Rowan v. U. S. Post Office Dept. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_399/argument None Thu, 22 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63435 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Key - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_402/argument None Wed, 21 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63553 at http://www.oyez.org Dickey v. Florida - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_728/argument None Wed, 21 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63440 at http://www.oyez.org U. S. v. Sisson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_305/argument None Tue, 20 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 79265 at http://www.oyez.org Welsh v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_76/argument On March 27, 1964, Elliot Ashton Welsh II was ordered by the Selective Service to report for physical examination after having been classified I-A and available for military service. Walsh requested and filed application for conscientious objector status. On his form, Welsh specifically indicated that his objection was not rooted in religious belief; he responded "No" where the questionnaire asked if he believed in a supreme being. An appeal board rejected his application. Welsh refused to appear for induction and, on June 1, 1966, was sentenced to three years imprisonment. The Court ruled in United States v. Seeger (1965) that conscientious objector status was not reserved to individuals of a traditional religious background. On appeal, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that because Welsh denied any religious foundation for his beliefs, whereas Seeger had characterized his pacifist beliefs as "religious," Welsh's conviction was valid. Tue, 20 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63470 at http://www.oyez.org In re Winship - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_778/argument At age twelve, Samuel Winship was arrested and charged as a juvenile delinquent for breaking into a woman's locker and stealing $112 from her pocketbook. The charge also alleged that had Winship's act been done by an adult, it would constitute larceny. Relying on Section 744(b) of the New York Family Court Act, which provided that determinations of juvenile's guilt be based on a preponderance of the evidence, a Family Court found Winship guilty, despite acknowledging that the evidence did not establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Winship's appeal of the court's use of the lower "preponderance of the evidence" burden of proof, was rejected in both the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court and in the New York Court of Appeals before the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Tue, 20 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 53903 at http://www.oyez.org U. S. v. Sisson - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_305/argument-1 None Tue, 20 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63495 at http://www.oyez.org U. S. v. Sisson - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_305/argument-2 None Tue, 20 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63472 at http://www.oyez.org Jones v. Board Of Education - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_731/argument-1 None Mon, 19 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63457 at http://www.oyez.org Hill v. California - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_51/reargument None Mon, 19 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63354 at http://www.oyez.org Hill v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_51/argument None Mon, 19 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63519 at http://www.oyez.org Arkansas v. Tennessee - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_33_orig/argument None Mon, 19 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63478 at http://www.oyez.org Jones v. Board Of Education - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_731/argument-2 None Mon, 19 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63505 at http://www.oyez.org Colonnade Corp. v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_108/argument None Thu, 15 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63564 at http://www.oyez.org Porter Co. v. NLRB - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_230/argument None Thu, 15 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63463 at http://www.oyez.org Rogers v. Bellei - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_24_2/reargument None Thu, 15 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63340 at http://www.oyez.org Rogers v. Bellei - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_24_2/argument None Thu, 15 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63545 at http://www.oyez.org Tooahnippah v. Hickel - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_300/argument None Wed, 14 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63469 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Reynolds - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_88/argument None Wed, 14 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63503 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Seckinger - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_395/argument None Wed, 14 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63537 at http://www.oyez.org Toussie v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_441/argument None Wed, 14 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63439 at http://www.oyez.org Czosek v. O'mara - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_234/argument None Tue, 13 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63539 at http://www.oyez.org Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_301/argument None Tue, 13 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63498 at http://www.oyez.org Reetz v. Bozanich - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_185/argument None Tue, 13 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63520 at http://www.oyez.org Longshoremen v. Ariadne Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_231/argument None Tue, 13 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63538 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Estate Of Donnelly - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_104/argument None Mon, 12 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63487 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Jorn - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_19_2/argument None Mon, 12 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63536 at http://www.oyez.org Taggart v. Weinacker's, Inc. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_74/argument None Mon, 12 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63448 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Davis - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_282/argument None Mon, 12 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63500 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Jorn - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_19_2/reargument None Mon, 12 Jan 1970 13:00:00 +0000 63382 at http://www.oyez.org Chandler v. Judicial Council - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_2_misc/argument None Wed, 10 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63563 at http://www.oyez.org In re Stolar - Oral Reargument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_18/reargument-1 None Tue, 09 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63429 at http://www.oyez.org In re Stolar - Oral Reargument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_18/reargument-2 None Tue, 09 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63407 at http://www.oyez.org In re Stolar - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_18/argument None Tue, 09 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63562 at http://www.oyez.org Dandridge v. Williams - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_131/argument The Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program, established by the Social Security Act of 1935 and jointly funded by the state and federal governments, provides financial assistance to children of families with little or no income. Under the program, each state computes a "standard of need" for each family. In Maryland, the standard of need increased with each additional member of the family, but became incrementally smaller, with an upper limit of $250 per month. Linda Williams, a single mother, and Junius and Jeanette Gary, husband and wife, were Baltimore residents and parents of eight children each. They objected to Maryland's means of calculating standard of need on the ground that it discriminated against larger families, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. They also argued that the calculation conflicted with the stated purpose of the program as laid out by the Social Security Act. They filed suit against Edmund P. Dandridge, Chairman of the Maryland State Board of Public Welfare, and several other state officials. A U.S. District Court originally ruled the Maryland regulation violated both the Social Security Act and the Equal Protection Clause. On reconsideration, the court altered its ruling and based its judgment entirely on constitutional grounds but nonetheless struck down the provision. Tue, 09 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63548 at http://www.oyez.org Baldwin v. New York - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_188/argument None Tue, 09 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63541 at http://www.oyez.org Boddie v. Connecticut - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_27/reargument Gladys Boddie was a married resident of Connecticut receiving welfare benefits. She filed for a divorce in New Haven County Superior Court. However, Boddie was not given a hearing because she had not paid the filing fee under Section 52-259 of the Connecticut General Statutes. Given her welfare status, she was unable to pay the fee. Her requests for fee waivers were also denied. Boddie and others who were denied divorces under Section 52-259 challenged the fee requirement in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. They alleged that the fee requirement violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The District Court upheld the requirement. Boddie appealed to the Supreme Court. Mon, 08 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63323 at http://www.oyez.org Baird v. State Bar of Arizona - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_15_2/argument-1 None Mon, 08 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63451 at http://www.oyez.org Sanks v. Georgia - Oral Reargument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_28_2/reargument-1 None Mon, 08 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63409 at http://www.oyez.org Boddie v. Connecticut - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_27/argument Gladys Boddie was a married resident of Connecticut receiving welfare benefits. She filed for a divorce in New Haven County Superior Court. However, Boddie was not given a hearing because she had not paid the filing fee under Section 52-259 of the Connecticut General Statutes. Given her welfare status, she was unable to pay the fee. Her requests for fee waivers were also denied. Boddie and others who were denied divorces under Section 52-259 challenged the fee requirement in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. They alleged that the fee requirement violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The District Court upheld the requirement. Boddie appealed to the Supreme Court. Mon, 08 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63551 at http://www.oyez.org Sanks v. Georgia - Oral Reargument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_28_2/reargument-2 None Mon, 08 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63420 at http://www.oyez.org Baird v. State Bar of Arizona - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_15_2/argument-2 None Mon, 08 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63482 at http://www.oyez.org Simmons v. West Haven Housing - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_81/argument None Mon, 08 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63453 at http://www.oyez.org Sanks v. Georgia - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_28_2/argument None Mon, 08 Dec 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63552 at http://www.oyez.org City Of Chicago v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_101/argument None Thu, 20 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63494 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Kordel - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_87/argument None Thu, 20 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63437 at http://www.oyez.org Morales v. New York - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_86/argument None Thu, 20 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63554 at http://www.oyez.org Gutknecht v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_71/argument None Thu, 20 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63475 at http://www.oyez.org Barlow v. Collins - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_249/argument None Wed, 19 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63461 at http://www.oyez.org Rosado v. Wyman - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_540/argument None Wed, 19 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63454 at http://www.oyez.org Breen v. Selective Service Board - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_65/argument None Wed, 19 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63557 at http://www.oyez.org Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_135/argument Frederick Walz, the owner of real estate in Richmond County, New York, brought suit against the New York City Tax Commission, challenging property tax exemptions for churches. Walz alleged that the exemptions forced him, as a taxpayer, to indirectly contribute to those churches. Wed, 19 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 53904 at http://www.oyez.org Data Processing Service v. Camp - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_85/argument None Tue, 18 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63502 at http://www.oyez.org Hester v. Illinois - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_82/argument None Tue, 18 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63529 at http://www.oyez.org Brady v. U. S. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_270/argument None Tue, 18 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63544 at http://www.oyez.org Coleman v. Alabama - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_72/argument None Tue, 18 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63460 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Webb, Inc. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_63/argument None Mon, 17 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63465 at http://www.oyez.org Parker v. North Carolina - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_268/argument None Mon, 17 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63473 at http://www.oyez.org North Carolina v. Alford - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_14_2/argument None Mon, 17 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63525 at http://www.oyez.org Goldstein v. Cox - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_66/argument None Mon, 17 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63533 at http://www.oyez.org Ashe v. Swenson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_57/argument None Thu, 13 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63476 at http://www.oyez.org Waller v. Florida - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_24/argument None Thu, 13 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63516 at http://www.oyez.org Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_64/argument None Thu, 13 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63442 at http://www.oyez.org Wade v. Wilson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_55/argument None Wed, 12 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63447 at http://www.oyez.org Evans v. Abney - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_60/argument-1 None Wed, 12 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63514 at http://www.oyez.org Evans v. Abney - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_60/argument-2 None Wed, 12 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63523 at http://www.oyez.org Conway v. Adult Authority - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_40/argument None Wed, 12 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63555 at http://www.oyez.org Anderson's-Black Rock v. Pavement Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_45/argument None Mon, 10 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63556 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. White - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_13/reargument A government informant, Harvey Jackson, wore a concealed radio transmitter and engaged in four conversations with defendant White at three different locations: Jackson's house, a restaurant, and Jackson's automobile. Government agents listened to each of the radio transmissions, thereby overhearing defendant White make self-incriminating remarks regarding his involvement in multiple narcotics transactions. Jackson was unavailable during the trial, so the prosecution offered the testimony of the agents who had conducted the electronic surveillance as evidence. Mon, 10 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63353 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. White - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_13/argument A government informant, Harvey Jackson, wore a concealed radio transmitter and engaged in four conversations with defendant White at three different locations: Jackson's house, a restaurant, and Jackson's automobile. Government agents listened to each of the radio transmissions, thereby overhearing defendant White make self-incriminating remarks regarding his involvement in multiple narcotics transactions. Jackson was unavailable during the trial, so the prosecution offered the testimony of the agents who had conducted the electronic surveillance as evidence. Mon, 10 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63511 at http://www.oyez.org Hadley v. Junior College District - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_37/argument None Mon, 10 Nov 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63446 at http://www.oyez.org Alexander v. Board Of Education - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_632/argument None Thu, 23 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63509 at http://www.oyez.org Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_41/reargument None Wed, 22 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63517 at http://www.oyez.org Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_41/argument-1 None Wed, 22 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63549 at http://www.oyez.org Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_41/argument-2 None Wed, 22 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63506 at http://www.oyez.org Brockington v. Rhodes - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_31/argument None Wed, 22 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63481 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_32/argument None Wed, 22 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63559 at http://www.oyez.org Carter v. Jury Commission - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_30/argument None Tue, 21 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63528 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_28/argument-2 None Tue, 21 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63455 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_28/argument-1 None Tue, 21 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63492 at http://www.oyez.org Shore Line v. Transportation Union - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_29/argument None Mon, 20 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63508 at http://www.oyez.org Turner v. Fouche - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_23/argument None Mon, 20 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63513 at http://www.oyez.org Zuber v. Allen - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_25/argument None Thu, 16 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63477 at http://www.oyez.org First National Bank v. Dickinson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_19/argument None Thu, 16 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63434 at http://www.oyez.org Dutton v. Evans - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_10/argument None Wed, 15 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63546 at http://www.oyez.org Dutton v. Evans - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_10/reargument None Wed, 15 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63235 at http://www.oyez.org Turner v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_190/argument None Wed, 15 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63547 at http://www.oyez.org Minor v. United States - Oral Argument (No. 271) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_189/271_argument None Wed, 15 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79260 at http://www.oyez.org Minor v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_189/argument None Wed, 15 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63479 at http://www.oyez.org Bryson v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_35/argument None Tue, 14 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63526 at http://www.oyez.org Hall v. Beals - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_39/argument None Tue, 14 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63468 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Knox - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_17/argument None Tue, 14 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63534 at http://www.oyez.org Goldberg v. Kelly - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_62/argument John Kelly, acting on behalf of New York residents receiving financial assistance either under the federally-assisted program for Families with Dependent Children or under New York State's home relief program, challenged the constitutionality of procedures for notice and termination of such aid. Although originally offering no official notice or opportunity for hearings to those whose aid was scheduled for termination, the State of New York implemented a hearing procedure after commencement of Kelly's litigation. Mon, 13 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 53905 at http://www.oyez.org Wheeler v. Montgomery - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_14/argument None Mon, 13 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63532 at http://www.oyez.org Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_33/argument None Mon, 13 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63484 at http://www.oyez.org Debacker v. Brainard - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_15/argument-1 None Mon, 13 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63445 at http://www.oyez.org Debacker v. Brainard - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_15/argument-2 None Mon, 13 Oct 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63530 at http://www.oyez.org Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_624/argument-1 None Tue, 22 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79830 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Estate Of Grace - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_574/argument None Tue, 22 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79688 at http://www.oyez.org Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_624/argument None Tue, 22 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79742 at http://www.oyez.org Willingham v. Morgan - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_228/argument None Tue, 22 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79726 at http://www.oyez.org Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_130/argument None Mon, 21 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79641 at http://www.oyez.org Powell v. McCormack - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_138/argument Adam Clayton Powell pecked at his fellow representatives from his unassailable perch in New York's Harlem. Powell had been embroiled in controversy inside and outside Washington. When Powell failed to heed civil proceedings against him in New York, a judge held him in criminal contempt. His problems were only beginning. He won reelection in 1966 but the House of Representatives voted to exclude him. Mon, 21 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 53902 at http://www.oyez.org Sullivan v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_610/argument None Wed, 02 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79741 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. King - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_672/argument None Wed, 02 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79745 at http://www.oyez.org Red Lion Broadcasting Co.v. FCC - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_2_2/argument-2 The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) fairness doctrine requires radio and television broadcasters to present a balanced and fair discussion of public issues on the airwaves. The doctrine is composed of two primary requirements concerning personal attacks in the context of public issue debates and political editorializing. The FCC conditioned its renewal of broadcast licenses on compliance with its regulations. Red Lion Broadcasting challenged the application of the fairness doctrine with respect to a particular broadcast. In a companion case (United States v. Radio Television News Directors Association (RTNDA)), the fairness doctrine's requirements concerning any broadcast were challenged. Wed, 02 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79753 at http://www.oyez.org Red Lion Broadcasting Co.v. FCC - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_2_2/argument-1 The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) fairness doctrine requires radio and television broadcasters to present a balanced and fair discussion of public issues on the airwaves. The doctrine is composed of two primary requirements concerning personal attacks in the context of public issue debates and political editorializing. The FCC conditioned its renewal of broadcast licenses on compliance with its regulations. Red Lion Broadcasting challenged the application of the fairness doctrine with respect to a particular broadcast. In a companion case (United States v. Radio Television News Directors Association (RTNDA)), the fairness doctrine's requirements concerning any broadcast were challenged. Wed, 02 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79650 at http://www.oyez.org Red Lion Broadcasting Co.v. FCC - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_2_2/argument The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) fairness doctrine requires radio and television broadcasters to present a balanced and fair discussion of public issues on the airwaves. The doctrine is composed of two primary requirements concerning personal attacks in the context of public issue debates and political editorializing. The FCC conditioned its renewal of broadcast licenses on compliance with its regulations. Red Lion Broadcasting challenged the application of the fairness doctrine with respect to a particular broadcast. In a companion case (United States v. Radio Television News Directors Association (RTNDA)), the fairness doctrine's requirements concerning any broadcast were challenged. Wed, 02 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 53897 at http://www.oyez.org Red Lion Broadcasting Co.v. FCC - Oral Argument (No. 717) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_2_2/717_argument The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) fairness doctrine requires radio and television broadcasters to present a balanced and fair discussion of public issues on the airwaves. The doctrine is composed of two primary requirements concerning personal attacks in the context of public issue debates and political editorializing. The FCC conditioned its renewal of broadcast licenses on compliance with its regulations. Red Lion Broadcasting challenged the application of the fairness doctrine with respect to a particular broadcast. In a companion case (United States v. Radio Television News Directors Association (RTNDA)), the fairness doctrine's requirements concerning any broadcast were challenged. Wed, 02 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79704 at http://www.oyez.org Red Lion Broadcasting Co.v. FCC - Oral Argument, Part 3 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_2_2/argument-3 The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) fairness doctrine requires radio and television broadcasters to present a balanced and fair discussion of public issues on the airwaves. The doctrine is composed of two primary requirements concerning personal attacks in the context of public issue debates and political editorializing. The FCC conditioned its renewal of broadcast licenses on compliance with its regulations. Red Lion Broadcasting challenged the application of the fairness doctrine with respect to a particular broadcast. In a companion case (United States v. Radio Television News Directors Association (RTNDA)), the fairness doctrine's requirements concerning any broadcast were challenged. Wed, 02 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79829 at http://www.oyez.org Williams v. Oklahoma City - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_841/argument-1 None Tue, 01 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79712 at http://www.oyez.org Samuels v. Mackell - Oral Reargument (Nov. 16, 1970) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7_3/reargument-2 None Tue, 01 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63571 at http://www.oyez.org Williams v. Oklahoma City - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_841/argument-2 None Tue, 01 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79748 at http://www.oyez.org Samuels v. Mackell - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7_3/argument None Tue, 01 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79706 at http://www.oyez.org Younger v. Harris - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_2/argument California's Criminal Syndicalism Act prohibited advocating, teaching, or aiding the commission of a crime or unlawful acts of violence or terrorism. John Harris, a socialist, was indicted under the statute. Harris claimed the law had a "chilling effect" on his freedom of speech. After a California state court upheld Harris' conviction, a federal district court struck down the Act because of vagueness and overbreadth. Tue, 01 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 53896 at http://www.oyez.org Younger v. Harris - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_2/argument-1 California's Criminal Syndicalism Act prohibited advocating, teaching, or aiding the commission of a crime or unlawful acts of violence or terrorism. John Harris, a socialist, was indicted under the statute. Harris claimed the law had a "chilling effect" on his freedom of speech. After a California state court upheld Harris' conviction, a federal district court struck down the Act because of vagueness and overbreadth. Tue, 01 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79828 at http://www.oyez.org Younger v. Harris - Oral Reargument (Apr. 29, 1970) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_2/reargument California's Criminal Syndicalism Act prohibited advocating, teaching, or aiding the commission of a crime or unlawful acts of violence or terrorism. John Harris, a socialist, was indicted under the statute. Harris claimed the law had a "chilling effect" on his freedom of speech. After a California state court upheld Harris' conviction, a federal district court struck down the Act because of vagueness and overbreadth. Tue, 01 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62308 at http://www.oyez.org Samuels v. Mackell - Oral Reargument (Apr. 29, 1970) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7_3/reargument None Tue, 01 Apr 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79261 at http://www.oyez.org Moore v. Ogilvie - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_620/argument None Thu, 27 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79693 at http://www.oyez.org Chimel v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_770/argument Local police officers went to Chimel's home with a warrant authorizing his arrest for burglary. Upon serving him with the arrest warrant, the officers conducted a comprehensive search of Chimel's residence. The search uncovered a number of items that were later used to convict Chimel. State courts upheld the conviction. Thu, 27 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 53901 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_573/argument None Wed, 26 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79687 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 (No. 585) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_573/585_argument-%29 None Wed, 26 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 80411 at http://www.oyez.org Rodriquez v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_749/argument None Wed, 26 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79709 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 (No. 585) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_573/585_argument-%29 None Wed, 26 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79759 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 585) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_573/585_argument-%29 None Wed, 26 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 80412 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 585) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_573/585_argument-%29 None Wed, 26 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79740 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co. - Oral Argument (No. 585) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_573/585_argument None Wed, 26 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79833 at http://www.oyez.org Nacirema Co. v. Johnson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_9/argument None Tue, 25 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79749 at http://www.oyez.org Nacirema Co. v. Johnson - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_9/reargument None Tue, 25 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63441 at http://www.oyez.org Jenkins v. Mckeithen - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_548/argument None Tue, 25 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79686 at http://www.oyez.org Boyle v. Landry - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_4/reargument None Mon, 24 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63341 at http://www.oyez.org Boyle v. Landry - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_4/argument None Mon, 24 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79673 at http://www.oyez.org Daniel v. Paul - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_488/argument-1 None Mon, 24 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79681 at http://www.oyez.org Daniel v. Paul - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_488/argument-2 None Mon, 24 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79682 at http://www.oyez.org Jenkins v. Delaware - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_748/argument None Wed, 05 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79747 at http://www.oyez.org Maxwell v. Bishop - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_13_2/reargument None Tue, 04 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63480 at http://www.oyez.org Maxwell v. Bishop - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_13_2/argument None Tue, 04 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79643 at http://www.oyez.org Boykin v. Alabama - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_642/argument None Tue, 04 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79743 at http://www.oyez.org Ymca v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_517/argument None Mon, 03 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79738 at http://www.oyez.org Bingler v. Johnson - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_473/argument-1 None Mon, 03 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79756 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_463/argument None Mon, 03 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79679 at http://www.oyez.org Bingler v. Johnson - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_473/argument-2 None Mon, 03 Mar 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79736 at http://www.oyez.org Mckart v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_403/argument None Thu, 27 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79671 at http://www.oyez.org Brandenburg v. Ohio - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_492/argument Brandenburg, a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a Klan rally and was later convicted under an Ohio criminal syndicalism law. The law made illegal advocating "crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform," as well as assembling "with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate the doctrines of criminal syndicalism." Thu, 27 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 53900 at http://www.oyez.org Duvernay v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_814/argument None Thu, 27 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79711 at http://www.oyez.org Davis v. Mississippi - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_645/argument-2 None Wed, 26 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79744 at http://www.oyez.org Orozco v. Texas - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_641/argument None Wed, 26 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79695 at http://www.oyez.org Frazier v. Cupp - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_643/argument None Wed, 26 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79696 at http://www.oyez.org Davis v. Mississippi - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_645/argument-1 None Wed, 26 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79689 at http://www.oyez.org Boulden v. Holman - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_644/argument None Wed, 26 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79697 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. U.S. Coin & Currency - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_5_2/argument-1 None Tue, 25 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79737 at http://www.oyez.org Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_436/argument None Tue, 25 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79734 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. U.S. Coin & Currency - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_5_2/reargument None Tue, 25 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63334 at http://www.oyez.org Gregg v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_453/argument None Tue, 25 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79678 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. U.S. Coin & Currency - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_5_2/argument-2 None Tue, 25 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79757 at http://www.oyez.org Immigration Service v. Stanisic - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_297/argument None Tue, 25 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79662 at http://www.oyez.org Cardinale v. Louisiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_76/argument None Mon, 24 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79710 at http://www.oyez.org North Carolina v. Pearce - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_413/argument None Mon, 24 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79672 at http://www.oyez.org North Carolina v. Pearce - Oral Argument (No. 418) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_413/418_argument None Mon, 24 Feb 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79733 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Bacto-Unidisk - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_343/argument None Thu, 23 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79666 at http://www.oyez.org Kramer v. Caribbean Mills - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_156/argument None Thu, 23 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79723 at http://www.oyez.org Fortner Enterprises v. U.S. Steel - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_306/argument None Thu, 23 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79663 at http://www.oyez.org O'callahan v. Parker - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_646/argument None Thu, 23 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79699 at http://www.oyez.org Zenith Corp. v. Hazeltine - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_49/argument None Wed, 22 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79683 at http://www.oyez.org Snyder v. Harris - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_109/argument None Tue, 21 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79720 at http://www.oyez.org Snyder v. Harris - Oral Argument, Part 1 (No. 117) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_109/117_argument-%29 None Tue, 21 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79831 at http://www.oyez.org Snyder v. Harris - Oral Argument, Part 1 (No. 117) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_109/117_argument-%29 None Tue, 21 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 80223 at http://www.oyez.org Snyder v. Harris - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 117) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_109/117_argument-%29 None Tue, 21 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79639 at http://www.oyez.org Snyder v. Harris - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 117) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_109/117_argument-%29 None Tue, 21 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79832 at http://www.oyez.org Snyder v. Harris - Oral Argument, Part 1 (No. 117) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_109/117_argument-%29 None Tue, 21 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79718 at http://www.oyez.org Snyder v. Harris - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 117) /cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_109/117_argument-%29 None Tue, 21 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 80224 at http://www.oyez.org Kramer v. Union School District - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_258/argument Section 2012 of the New York Education Law permitted school districts to limit eligible voters in school district elections to citizens owning or leasing taxable real property and parents of children enrolled in public schools. Union School District No. 15 applied these restrictions. On April 25, 1965, Morris H. Kramer, a resident of district 15 who resided with his parents and had no children, attempted to register for the local school district elections. His application was rejected for failure to comply with the restrictions. Kramer filed a class-action suit against the school board in federal court, claiming his constitutional rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment had been violated. The district court initially declined to hear his constitutional claims, but, on appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit directed the district court to hear Kramer's claim. On hearing the complaint, the court found no constitutional violation and denied Kramer's claim. Thu, 16 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79657 at http://www.oyez.org Dunbar-Stanley Studios v. Alabama - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_376/argument None Thu, 16 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79668 at http://www.oyez.org Citizen Publishing Co. v. U.S. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_243/argument None Wed, 15 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79727 at http://www.oyez.org Marine Terminals v. Shipping Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_291/argument None Wed, 15 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79660 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Skelly Oil Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_280/argument None Wed, 15 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79728 at http://www.oyez.org Stanley v. Georgia - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_293/argument Law enforcement officers, under the authority of a warrant, searched Stanley's home pursuant to an investigation of his alleged bookmaking activities. During the search, the officers found three reels of eight-millimeter film. The officers viewed the films, concluded they were obscene, and seized them. Stanley was then tried and convicted under a Georgia law prohibiting the possession of obscene materials. Tue, 14 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 53898 at http://www.oyez.org Scofield v. NLRB - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_273/argument None Tue, 14 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79659 at http://www.oyez.org Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen v. O'connell - Oral Argument (No. 172) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_158/172_argument None Tue, 14 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79649 at http://www.oyez.org Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen v. O'connell - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_158/argument None Tue, 14 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79646 at http://www.oyez.org Stanley v. Georgia - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_293/argument-1 Law enforcement officers, under the authority of a warrant, searched Stanley's home pursuant to an investigation of his alleged bookmaking activities. During the search, the officers found three reels of eight-millimeter film. The officers viewed the films, concluded they were obscene, and seized them. Stanley was then tried and convicted under a Georgia law prohibiting the possession of obscene materials. Tue, 14 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79654 at http://www.oyez.org Stanley v. Georgia - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_293/argument-2 Law enforcement officers, under the authority of a warrant, searched Stanley's home pursuant to an investigation of his alleged bookmaking activities. During the search, the officers found three reels of eight-millimeter film. The officers viewed the films, concluded they were obscene, and seized them. Stanley was then tried and convicted under a Georgia law prohibiting the possession of obscene materials. Tue, 14 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79729 at http://www.oyez.org Wells v. Rockefeller - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_238/argument None Mon, 13 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79655 at http://www.oyez.org Kirkpatrick v. Preisler - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_30/argument None Mon, 13 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79730 at http://www.oyez.org Gunn v. University Committee - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7_2/argument-1 None Mon, 13 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79762 at http://www.oyez.org Gunn v. University Committee - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7_2/argument-2 None Mon, 13 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 79763 at http://www.oyez.org Gunn v. University Committee - Oral Reargument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7_2/reargument-1 None Mon, 13 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63568 at http://www.oyez.org Gunn v. University Committee - Oral Reargument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7_2/reargument-2 None Mon, 13 Jan 1969 13:00:00 +0000 63569 at http://www.oyez.org Frank v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_200/argument None Thu, 12 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79652 at http://www.oyez.org Benton v. Maryland - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_201/reargument None Thu, 12 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79766 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Covington - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_366/argument None Thu, 12 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79667 at http://www.oyez.org Benton v. Maryland - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_201/argument None Thu, 12 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79725 at http://www.oyez.org Leary v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_65/argument-1 None Wed, 11 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79698 at http://www.oyez.org Mattiello v. Connecticut - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_150/argument None Wed, 11 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79645 at http://www.oyez.org Smith v. Hooey - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_198/argument None Wed, 11 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79724 at http://www.oyez.org Railroad Trainmen v. Terminal Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_69/argument None Wed, 11 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79703 at http://www.oyez.org Leary v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_65/argument-2 None Wed, 11 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79760 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Strong - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_61/argument None Tue, 10 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79691 at http://www.oyez.org Gregory v. Chicago - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_60/argument None Tue, 10 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79690 at http://www.oyez.org Skinner v. Louisiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_44/argument None Tue, 10 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79676 at http://www.oyez.org Mccarthy v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_43/argument None Mon, 09 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79675 at http://www.oyez.org Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_71/argument-2 None Mon, 09 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79761 at http://www.oyez.org Harris v. Nelson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_199/argument None Mon, 09 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79651 at http://www.oyez.org Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_71/argument-1 None Mon, 09 Dec 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79701 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Augenblick - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_45/argument None Thu, 21 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79677 at http://www.oyez.org Palmieri v. Florida - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_131/argument None Wed, 20 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79642 at http://www.oyez.org Lear, Inc. v. Adkins - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_56/argument-1 None Wed, 20 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79685 at http://www.oyez.org Gardner v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_73/argument None Wed, 20 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79707 at http://www.oyez.org Stiles v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_74/argument None Wed, 20 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79708 at http://www.oyez.org Lear, Inc. v. Adkins - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_56/argument-2 None Wed, 20 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79758 at http://www.oyez.org Foster v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_47/argument None Tue, 19 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79680 at http://www.oyez.org Mcdonald v. Board Of Election - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_68/argument None Tue, 19 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79702 at http://www.oyez.org SEC v. National Securities, Inc. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_41/argument-2 None Mon, 18 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79755 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Louisiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_9_orig_2/argument None Mon, 18 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79713 at http://www.oyez.org Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_42/argument None Mon, 18 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79674 at http://www.oyez.org SEC v. National Securities, Inc. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_41/argument-1 None Mon, 18 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79665 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Container Corp. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_27/argument None Mon, 18 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79658 at http://www.oyez.org Johnson v. Avery - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_40/argument None Thu, 14 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79670 at http://www.oyez.org Glover v. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_38/argument None Thu, 14 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79732 at http://www.oyez.org Perez v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_39/argument None Thu, 14 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79669 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Texaco - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_24/argument None Wed, 13 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79656 at http://www.oyez.org Johnson v. Bennett - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_32/argument-1 None Wed, 13 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79664 at http://www.oyez.org Johnson v. Bennett - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_32/argument-2 None Wed, 13 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79754 at http://www.oyez.org Hunter v. Erickson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_63/argument None Wed, 13 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79694 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Nardello - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_51/argument None Tue, 12 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79648 at http://www.oyez.org Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Comm. School Dist. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_21/argument John Tinker, 15 years old, his sister Mary Beth Tinker, 13 years old, and Christopher Echardt, 16 years old, decided along with their parents to protest the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands to their Des Moines schools during the Christmas holiday season. Upon learning of their intentions, and fearing that the armbands would provoke disturbances, the principals of the Des Moines school district resolved that all students wearing armbands be asked to remove them or face suspension. When the Tinker siblings and Christopher wore their armbands to school, they were asked to remove them. When they refused, they were suspended until after New Year's Day. Tue, 12 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53899 at http://www.oyez.org Desist v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_12/argument None Tue, 12 Nov 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79721 at http://www.oyez.org Grunenthal v. Long Island R. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_35/argument None Thu, 24 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79731 at http://www.oyez.org Oestereich v. Selective Service Bd. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_46/argument None Thu, 24 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79735 at http://www.oyez.org U.S. v. Phosphate Export Assn. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_29/argument None Thu, 24 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79661 at http://www.oyez.org Thorpe v. Housing Authority - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_20/argument None Wed, 23 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79653 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Donruss Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_17/argument-2 None Tue, 22 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79750 at http://www.oyez.org Firemen v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_16/argument None Tue, 22 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79647 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Donruss Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_17/argument-1 None Tue, 22 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79640 at http://www.oyez.org Commonwealth Corp. v. Casualty Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_14/argument None Tue, 22 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79644 at http://www.oyez.org Shuttle Corp. v. Transit Comm'n - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_19/argument-1 None Mon, 21 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79751 at http://www.oyez.org Street v. New York - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_5/argument None Mon, 21 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79684 at http://www.oyez.org Shuttle Corp. v. Transit Comm'n - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_19/argument-2 None Mon, 21 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79752 at http://www.oyez.org Carroll v. Princess Anne - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_6/argument None Mon, 21 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79692 at http://www.oyez.org Hadnott v. Amos - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_647/argument The National Democratic Party of Alabama (NDPA) sought to place the names of minority candidates on the ballot for local and state-wide offices. Alabama election officials denied the NDPA request under the Alabama Corrupt Practices Act. The NDPA then brought suit in a special three-judge U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama claiming constitutional violations. NDPA lost and appealed directly to the Supreme Court. Initially, the Court heard arguments on October 18 in support of a temporary restraining order which it had granted on October 14. The day after oral argument, the Court granted the order and subsequently addressed the merits of the controversy on March 25. Fri, 18 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79700 at http://www.oyez.org Whyy v. Glassboro - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_10/argument None Thu, 17 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79719 at http://www.oyez.org B. & O. R. Co. v. Aberdeen & R. R. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_13/argument None Thu, 17 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79722 at http://www.oyez.org Epperson v. Arkansas - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7/argument The Arkansas legislature passed a law prohibiting teachers in public or state- supported schools from teaching, or using textbooks that teach, human evolution. Epperson, a public school teacher, sued, claiming the law violated her First Amendment right to free speech as well as the Establishment Clause. The State Chancery Court ruled that it violated his free speech rights; the State Supreme Court reversed. Wed, 16 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79705 at http://www.oyez.org Spinelli v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_8/argument-1 Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) applied for, and were issued, a search warrant to assist in uncovering evidence of defendant William Spinelli conducting illegal gambling activities. In the affidavit required for the warrant application, the FBI agents stated the defendant was known to "local law enforcement officials as a bookmaker." The FBI related in the affidavit that agents had tracked defendant Spinelli for five days, and that on four of the days, Spinelli was seen crossing into St. Louis, MO, entering an apartment at 1108 Indian Circle Drive. Finally, the agents offered that they "had been informed by a confidential reliable informant that William Spinelli is operating a handbook and accepting wagers and disseminating wagering information by means of the telephones which have been assigned the numbers WYdown 4-0029 and WYdown 4-0136." Wed, 16 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79746 at http://www.oyez.org Spinelli v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_8/argument-2 Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) applied for, and were issued, a search warrant to assist in uncovering evidence of defendant William Spinelli conducting illegal gambling activities. In the affidavit required for the warrant application, the FBI agents stated the defendant was known to "local law enforcement officials as a bookmaker." The FBI related in the affidavit that agents had tracked defendant Spinelli for five days, and that on four of the days, Spinelli was seen crossing into St. Louis, MO, entering an apartment at 1108 Indian Circle Drive. Finally, the agents offered that they "had been informed by a confidential reliable informant that William Spinelli is operating a handbook and accepting wagers and disseminating wagering information by means of the telephones which have been assigned the numbers WYdown 4-0029 and WYdown 4-0136." Wed, 16 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79764 at http://www.oyez.org Allen v. State Board Of Elections - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_3/argument-2 Voters and candidates in Mississippi and Virginia filed four separate cases seeking judgments that certain amendments to their states' election laws and procedures were subject to the pre-approval requirements of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and hence were not enforceable until the state complied with the requirements. The district courts found that the Voting Rights Act did not apply to the voting changes in the four cases and dismissed the complaints. The voters and candidates filed direct appeals, and the cases were consolidated. Tue, 15 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 66837 at http://www.oyez.org Allen v. State Board Of Elections - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_3/argument-1 Voters and candidates in Mississippi and Virginia filed four separate cases seeking judgments that certain amendments to their states' election laws and procedures were subject to the pre-approval requirements of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and hence were not enforceable until the state complied with the requirements. The district courts found that the Voting Rights Act did not apply to the voting changes in the four cases and dismissed the complaints. The voters and candidates filed direct appeals, and the cases were consolidated. Tue, 15 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 66838 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_9_orig/argument-1 None Mon, 14 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79716 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_9_orig/argument-2 None Mon, 14 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79765 at http://www.oyez.org Williams v. Rhodes - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_543/argument To be placed on the ballot in a presidential election, Ohio law required a new political party obtain voter signatures totaling 15% of the number of ballots cast in the preceding gubernatorial election. Both the American Independent Party and the Socialist Labor Party sought ballot access in Ohio for the 1968 presidential election. The American Independent Party, formed by supporters of George C. Wallace, obtained the requisite number of signatures but failed to file its petition for ballot access prior to the February 7, 1968 deadline. The Socialist Labor Party, which until 1948 had been on the ballot, failed to collect enough signatures and was also kept off the ballot. The parties filed separate suits in U.S. District Court against several state officials, including Governor James A. Rhodes, contending that being kept off the ballot violated their rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The cases were consolidated, and the court ruled that each party must be given write-in access but did not require the state to print the parties' candidates' names on the ballot. The American Independent Party requested and was granted an injunction forcing the state to add the party's candidates to the ballot while the case was on appeal. The Socialist Labor Party filed a similar request, but did so much later, and was denied primarily to avoid confusion in requiring the reprinting of another set of ballots. Mon, 07 Oct 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79739 at http://www.oyez.org Alderman v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 9) /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_133/9_argument-%29 The petitioners were convicted of illegally passing national defense information to the Soviet Union; their cases were affirmed on appeal. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In a petition for rehearing, the petitioners claimed that the government had relied on illegally obtained eavesdropping evidence to convict. The Court granted a rehearing and in a per curiam opinion vacated the appellate court judgment and remanded the case to the federal trial court for a rehearing. The United States sought to modify the Supreme Court's order, urging that the eavesdropping evidence should be reviewed in camera by the trial judge who would then transmit only relevant evidence to the parties. The petitioners argued their opposition to the motion in the 1967 Term. The matter was reargued in the 1968 Term. Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 80496 at http://www.oyez.org Alderman v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_133/argument The petitioners were convicted of illegally passing national defense information to the Soviet Union; their cases were affirmed on appeal. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In a petition for rehearing, the petitioners claimed that the government had relied on illegally obtained eavesdropping evidence to convict. The Court granted a rehearing and in a per curiam opinion vacated the appellate court judgment and remanded the case to the federal trial court for a rehearing. The United States sought to modify the Supreme Court's order, urging that the eavesdropping evidence should be reviewed in camera by the trial judge who would then transmit only relevant evidence to the parties. The petitioners argued their opposition to the motion in the 1967 Term. The matter was reargued in the 1968 Term. Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79899 at http://www.oyez.org Lee v. Florida - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_174/argument None Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79904 at http://www.oyez.org Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration Ser - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_638/argument None Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79954 at http://www.oyez.org Alderman v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 9) /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_133/9_argument-%29 The petitioners were convicted of illegally passing national defense information to the Soviet Union; their cases were affirmed on appeal. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In a petition for rehearing, the petitioners claimed that the government had relied on illegally obtained eavesdropping evidence to convict. The Court granted a rehearing and in a per curiam opinion vacated the appellate court judgment and remanded the case to the federal trial court for a rehearing. The United States sought to modify the Supreme Court's order, urging that the eavesdropping evidence should be reviewed in camera by the trial judge who would then transmit only relevant evidence to the parties. The petitioners argued their opposition to the motion in the 1967 Term. The matter was reargued in the 1968 Term. Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79880 at http://www.oyez.org Alderman v. United States - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_133/reargument The petitioners were convicted of illegally passing national defense information to the Soviet Union; their cases were affirmed on appeal. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. In a petition for rehearing, the petitioners claimed that the government had relied on illegally obtained eavesdropping evidence to convict. The Court granted a rehearing and in a per curiam opinion vacated the appellate court judgment and remanded the case to the federal trial court for a rehearing. The United States sought to modify the Supreme Court's order, urging that the eavesdropping evidence should be reviewed in camera by the trial judge who would then transmit only relevant evidence to the parties. The petitioners argued their opposition to the motion in the 1967 Term. The matter was reargued in the 1968 Term. Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79715 at http://www.oyez.org Sabbath v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_898/argument None Thu, 02 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79980 at http://www.oyez.org Shapiro v. Thompson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/argument Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53884 at http://www.oyez.org Shapiro v. Thompson - Oral Reargument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/reargument-2 Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79717 at http://www.oyez.org Shapiro v. Thompson - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/argument-1 Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79879 at http://www.oyez.org Sanitation Men v. Sanitation Comm'r - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_823/argument None Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79975 at http://www.oyez.org Shapiro v. Thompson - Oral Reargument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/reargument-1 Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79714 at http://www.oyez.org Shapiro v. Thompson - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9/reargument Thompson was a pregnant, nineteen-year-old mother of one child who applied for assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in Connecticut after having recently moved there from Massachusetts. Connecticut denied her aid since she did not satisfy the state's one-year residency requirement. This case was decided together with Washington v. Legrant and Reynolds v. Smith. In Washington, three people applied for and were denied AFDC aid on the ground that they had not resided in the District of Columbia for one year immediately preceding the filing of their application In Reynolds, two appellees, Smith and Foster, were denied AFDC aid on the sole ground that they had not been residents of Pennsylvania for at least a year prior to their applications as required by a Pennsylvania Welfare Code. Wed, 01 May 1968 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62310 at http://www.oyez.org Gardner v. Broderick - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_635/argument None Tue, 30 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79953 at http://www.oyez.org Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_673/argument None Tue, 30 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79957 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Marine Workers - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_611/argument None Tue, 30 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79972 at http://www.oyez.org World Airways v. Pan American - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_800/argument-1 Mon, 29 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79877 at http://www.oyez.org World Airways v. Pan American - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_800/argument-2 Mon, 29 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79878 at http://www.oyez.org Wirtz v. Hotel Employees - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_891/argument None Mon, 29 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79979 at http://www.oyez.org Mancusi v. Deforte - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_844/argument None Thu, 25 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79976 at http://www.oyez.org Witherspoon v. Illinois - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_1015/argument Witherspoon was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by a jury in Illinois. An Illinois statute provides grounds for the dismissal of any juror with "conscientious scruples" against capital punishment. At Witherspoon's trial, the prosecution eliminated nearly half of the prospective jurors with qualms about capital punishment. The prosecution did not find out if most of the jurors dismissed would necessarily vote against capital punishment. Witherspoon appealed, alleging that the dismissal of prospective jurors with qualms about capital punishment violated his Sixth Amendment right to an "impartial jury" and 14th Amendment right to due process. On appeal, the Illinois Supreme Court found that no constitutional violation took place. Wed, 24 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79895 at http://www.oyez.org Bumper v. North Carolina - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_1016/argument-1 None Wed, 24 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79835 at http://www.oyez.org Bumper v. North Carolina - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_1016/argument-2 None Wed, 24 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79836 at http://www.oyez.org American Lines v. L. & N. R. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_797/argument-1 None Tue, 23 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79875 at http://www.oyez.org King v. Smith - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_949/argument None Tue, 23 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79982 at http://www.oyez.org Maryland v. Wirtz - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_742/argument None Tue, 23 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79968 at http://www.oyez.org American Lines v. L. & N. R. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_797/argument-2 None Tue, 23 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79876 at http://www.oyez.org Perma Mufflers v. Int'l Parts Corp. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_733/argument-2 None Mon, 22 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79874 at http://www.oyez.org Agricultural Bank v. Tax Comm'n - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_755/argument None Mon, 22 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79970 at http://www.oyez.org Board Of Education v. Allen - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_660/argument A 1965 amendment to New York's Education Law required public school boards to lend textbooks to elementary and secondary school students enrolled in private and parochial schools. The Board of Education for New York Central School District No. 1, contending that the law violated the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment, filed suit against James Allen, Commissioner of Education, requesting a declaratory injunction to prevent enforcement of the statute. The trial court agreed with the board and found the statute unconstitutional. The Appellate Division reversed the ruling, finding that the boards lacked standing. On appeal, the New York Court of Appeals ruled the boards did have standing, but also found that, because the law's purpose was to benefit all students regardless of the type of school they attended, the law did not violate the First Amendment. Mon, 22 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79956 at http://www.oyez.org Perma Mufflers v. Int'l Parts Corp. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_733/argument-1 None Mon, 22 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79873 at http://www.oyez.org Harrison v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_876/argument None Thu, 04 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79978 at http://www.oyez.org Commissioner v. Gordon - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_760/argument None Thu, 04 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79971 at http://www.oyez.org St. Amant v. Thompson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_517/argument None Thu, 04 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79943 at http://www.oyez.org Green v. County School Board - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_695/argument None Wed, 03 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79959 at http://www.oyez.org Raney v. Board Of Education - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_805/argument None Wed, 03 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79974 at http://www.oyez.org Monroe v. Board Of Commissioners - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_740/argument None Wed, 03 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79967 at http://www.oyez.org Mathis v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_726/argument-1 None Tue, 02 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79871 at http://www.oyez.org Mathis v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_726/argument-2 None Tue, 02 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79872 at http://www.oyez.org In Re Whittington - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_701/argument None Tue, 02 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79961 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. United Shoe Corp. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_597/argument None Mon, 01 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79949 at http://www.oyez.org Jones v. Mayer - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_645/argument-1 Jones, a black man, charged that a real estate company in Missouri's St. Louis County refused to sell him a home in a particular neighborhood on account of his race. Mon, 01 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53892 at http://www.oyez.org Jones v. Mayer - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_645/argument-2 Jones, a black man, charged that a real estate company in Missouri's St. Louis County refused to sell him a home in a particular neighborhood on account of his race. Mon, 01 Apr 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53893 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Coleman - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_630/argument None Thu, 28 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79952 at http://www.oyez.org Barber v. Page - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_703/argument None Thu, 28 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79963 at http://www.oyez.org Hanner v. Demarcus - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_497/argument None Thu, 28 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79940 at http://www.oyez.org Levy v. Louisiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_508/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79941 at http://www.oyez.org Peyton v. Rowe - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_802/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79973 at http://www.oyez.org Glona v. American Guarantee Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_639/argument-1 None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79863 at http://www.oyez.org Pickering v. Board Of Education - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_510/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79942 at http://www.oyez.org Glona v. American Guarantee Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_639/argument-2 None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79864 at http://www.oyez.org Carafas v. Lavallee - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_71/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79965 at http://www.oyez.org Miller v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_154/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79902 at http://www.oyez.org Watts v. Seward School Board - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_325/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79921 at http://www.oyez.org Puyallup Tribe v. Dept. Of Game - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_247/argument-1 None Mon, 25 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79845 at http://www.oyez.org Stern v. South Chester Tube Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_486/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79938 at http://www.oyez.org Puyallup Tribe v. Dept. Of Game - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_247/argument-2 None Mon, 25 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79846 at http://www.oyez.org Joint Industry Board v. U.S. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_616/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79950 at http://www.oyez.org Food Employees v. Logan Plaza - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_478/argument None Thu, 14 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79935 at http://www.oyez.org Edwards v. Pacific Fruit Express Co. - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_465/argument-e None Thu, 14 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79886 at http://www.oyez.org Edwards v. Pacific Fruit Express Co. - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_465/argument-e None Thu, 14 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 80365 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Johnson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_482/argument None Thu, 14 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79937 at http://www.oyez.org Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_618/argument None Wed, 13 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79951 at http://www.oyez.org Flast v. Cohen - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_416/argument Florence Flast and a group of taxpayers challenged federal legislation that financed the purchase of secular textbooks for use in religious schools. Flast argued that such use of tax money violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. A district court held that the federal courts should defer when confronted with taxpayer suits directed against federal spending programs. Tue, 12 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53885 at http://www.oyez.org U.S. v. Southwestern Cable Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_363/argument-1 None Tue, 12 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79883 at http://www.oyez.org U.S. v. Southwestern Cable Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 (incomplete) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_363/argument-2 None Tue, 12 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79884 at http://www.oyez.org Bruton v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_705/argument None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79964 at http://www.oyez.org Hopkins v. Cohen - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_276/argument-1 None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79847 at http://www.oyez.org Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge 735 - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_445/argument None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79933 at http://www.oyez.org Hopkins v. Cohen - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_276/argument-2 None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79848 at http://www.oyez.org Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane, v. Lisi - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_70/argument None Mon, 11 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79962 at http://www.oyez.org Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_339/argument None Thu, 07 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79924 at http://www.oyez.org Powell v. Texas - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_405/argument None Thu, 07 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79929 at http://www.oyez.org Johnson v. Massachusetts - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_702/argument-2 None Wed, 06 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79870 at http://www.oyez.org Anderson v. Johnson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_700/argument None Wed, 06 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79960 at http://www.oyez.org Johnson v. Massachusetts - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_702/argument-1 None Wed, 06 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79869 at http://www.oyez.org Cameron v. Johnson - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_699/argument-1 None Tue, 05 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79867 at http://www.oyez.org Cameron v. Johnson - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_699/argument-2 None Tue, 05 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79868 at http://www.oyez.org Hanover Shoe v. United Shoe Mach. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_335/argument None Tue, 05 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79923 at http://www.oyez.org In Re Ruffalo - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_73/argument None Mon, 04 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79966 at http://www.oyez.org Reading Co. v. Brown - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_127/argument-1 None Mon, 04 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79839 at http://www.oyez.org Reading Co. v. Brown - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_127/argument-2 None Mon, 04 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79840 at http://www.oyez.org Federation Of Musicians v. Carroll - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_309/argument None Mon, 04 Mar 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79919 at http://www.oyez.org Norfolk & W. R. Co. v. Tax Comm'n. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_324/argument None Thu, 25 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79920 at http://www.oyez.org Fmc v. Svenska Amerika Linien - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_257/argument None Thu, 25 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79913 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. O'Brien - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_232/argument David O'Brien burned his draft card at a Boston courthouse. He said he was expressing his opposition to war. He was convicted under a federal law that made the destruction or mutilation of drafts card a crime. Wed, 24 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53889 at http://www.oyez.org Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_65/argument None Wed, 24 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79955 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. United Insurance Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_178/argument-2 None Tue, 23 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79842 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. United Insurance Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_178/argument-1 None Tue, 23 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79841 at http://www.oyez.org Menominee Tribe v. United States - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_187/reargument None Mon, 22 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79838 at http://www.oyez.org FPC v. Sunray Dx Oil Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_60/argument-1 None Mon, 22 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79861 at http://www.oyez.org FPC v. Sunray Dx Oil Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_60/argument-2 None Mon, 22 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79862 at http://www.oyez.org Menominee Tribe v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_187/argument None Mon, 22 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79905 at http://www.oyez.org Harris v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_92/argument None Thu, 18 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79981 at http://www.oyez.org Dyke v. Taylor Implement Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_149/argument None Thu, 18 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79900 at http://www.oyez.org SEC v. New England Elec. System - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_305/argument None Thu, 18 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79918 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Neifert-White Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_267/argument None Thu, 18 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79915 at http://www.oyez.org Duncan v. Louisiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_410/argument Gary Duncan, a black teenager in Louisiana, was found guilty of assaulting a white youth by allegedly slapping him on the elbow. Duncan was sentenced to 60 days in prison and fined $150. Duncan's request for a jury trial was denied. Wed, 17 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 53890 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Habig - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_107/argument None Wed, 17 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79897 at http://www.oyez.org Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_59/argument None Wed, 17 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79948 at http://www.oyez.org Ginsberg v. New York - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_47/argument None Tue, 16 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79934 at http://www.oyez.org Bloom v. Illinois - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_52/argument-1 None Tue, 16 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79857 at http://www.oyez.org Bloom v. Illinois - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_52/argument-2 None Tue, 16 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79858 at http://www.oyez.org Interstate Circuit v. Dallas - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_56/argument-1 None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79885 at http://www.oyez.org Simmons v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_55/argument None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79946 at http://www.oyez.org Biggers v. Tennessee - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_237/argument None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79911 at http://www.oyez.org Peoria Tribe v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_219/argument None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79908 at http://www.oyez.org Interstate Circuit v. Dallas - Oral Argument, Part 2 (incomplete) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_56/argument-2 None Mon, 15 Jan 1968 13:00:00 +0000 79891 at http://www.oyez.org Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_40/argument None Wed, 13 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79928 at http://www.oyez.org Schneider v. Smith - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_196/argument-1 None Tue, 12 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79843 at http://www.oyez.org Schneider v. Smith - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_196/argument-2 None Tue, 12 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79844 at http://www.oyez.org Terry v. Ohio - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_67/argument Terry and two other men were observed by a plain clothes policeman in what the officer believed to be "casing a job, a stick-up." The officer stopped and frisked the three men, and found weapons on two of them. Terry was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon and sentenced to three years in jail. Tue, 12 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53886 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Third Nat. Bank - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_86/argument None Mon, 11 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79977 at http://www.oyez.org Sibron v. New York - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_63/argument-1 After following Nelson Sibron for several hours, and observing him talking with several narcotics addicts, NYC police officer Anthony Martinez stopped Sibron and questioned him. When Martinez said: "You know what I am after," Sibron began reaching into his pocket. Simultaneously, Martinez thrust his hand into Sibron's pocket and pulled out several heroin envelopes. Following his arrest for drug trafficking, Sibron sought to suppress the heroin evidence as the product of an unconstitutional stop-and-frisk search. When the Criminal Court of New York City denied his motion, Sibron appealed but suffered adverse rulings in the New York State appellate courts. On appeal, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard Sibron's case together with a related case, Peters v. New York. John Peters appealed his arrest and conviction for intent to commit burglary after a stop-and-frisk search of his person revealed burglary tools. Mon, 11 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53887 at http://www.oyez.org Sibron v. New York - Oral Argument (No. 74) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_63/74_argument After following Nelson Sibron for several hours, and observing him talking with several narcotics addicts, NYC police officer Anthony Martinez stopped Sibron and questioned him. When Martinez said: "You know what I am after," Sibron began reaching into his pocket. Simultaneously, Martinez thrust his hand into Sibron's pocket and pulled out several heroin envelopes. Following his arrest for drug trafficking, Sibron sought to suppress the heroin evidence as the product of an unconstitutional stop-and-frisk search. When the Criminal Court of New York City denied his motion, Sibron appealed but suffered adverse rulings in the New York State appellate courts. On appeal, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard Sibron's case together with a related case, Peters v. New York. John Peters appealed his arrest and conviction for intent to commit burglary after a stop-and-frisk search of his person revealed burglary tools. Mon, 11 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62191 at http://www.oyez.org Sibron v. New York - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_63/argument-2 After following Nelson Sibron for several hours, and observing him talking with several narcotics addicts, NYC police officer Anthony Martinez stopped Sibron and questioned him. When Martinez said: "You know what I am after," Sibron began reaching into his pocket. Simultaneously, Martinez thrust his hand into Sibron's pocket and pulled out several heroin envelopes. Following his arrest for drug trafficking, Sibron sought to suppress the heroin evidence as the product of an unconstitutional stop-and-frisk search. When the Criminal Court of New York City denied his motion, Sibron appealed but suffered adverse rulings in the New York State appellate courts. On appeal, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard Sibron's case together with a related case, Peters v. New York. John Peters appealed his arrest and conviction for intent to commit burglary after a stop-and-frisk search of his person revealed burglary tools. Mon, 11 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53888 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Jackson - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_85/argument-e None Thu, 07 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80485 at http://www.oyez.org Smith v. Illinois - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_158/argument None Thu, 07 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79903 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_26/argument None Thu, 07 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79914 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Jackson - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_85/argument-e None Thu, 07 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79894 at http://www.oyez.org Permian Basin Area Rate Cases - Oral Argument, Part 3 /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument-3 None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79984 at http://www.oyez.org Permian Basin Area Rate Cases - Oral Argument, Part 4 /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument-4 None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79985 at http://www.oyez.org Permian Basin Area Rate Cases - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80490 at http://www.oyez.org Permian Basin Area Rate Cases - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument-1 None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79887 at http://www.oyez.org Permian Basin Area Rate Cases - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_90/argument-2 None Tue, 05 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79983 at http://www.oyez.org Penn-Central Merger Cases - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_433/argument None Mon, 04 Dec 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79932 at http://www.oyez.org Avery v. Midland County - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_39/argument None Tue, 14 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79927 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Correll - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_113/argument None Tue, 14 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79898 at http://www.oyez.org Tcherepnin v. Knight - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_104/argument None Mon, 13 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79896 at http://www.oyez.org Volkswagenwerk v. Fmc - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_69/argument None Mon, 13 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79958 at http://www.oyez.org First Nat. Bank v. Cities Service - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_23/argument None Thu, 09 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79909 at http://www.oyez.org Albrecht v. Herald Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_43/argument None Thu, 09 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79931 at http://www.oyez.org Nash v. Florida Industrial Comm'n - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_48/argument None Thu, 09 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79936 at http://www.oyez.org Wirtz v. Laborers' Union - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_58/argument-2 None Wed, 08 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79860 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Fleetwood Trailer Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_49/argument None Wed, 08 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79939 at http://www.oyez.org Wirtz v. Bottle Blowers Assn. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_57/argument None Wed, 08 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79947 at http://www.oyez.org Wirtz v. Laborers' Union - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_58/argument-1 None Wed, 08 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79859 at http://www.oyez.org Protective Committee v. Anderson - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_38/argument-2 None Tue, 07 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79856 at http://www.oyez.org Zschernig v. Miller - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_21/argument None Tue, 07 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79907 at http://www.oyez.org Protective Committee v. Anderson - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_38/argument-1 None Tue, 07 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79855 at http://www.oyez.org Lee v. Washington - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_75/argument None Tue, 07 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79969 at http://www.oyez.org Provident Bank v. Patterson - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_28/argument-1 None Mon, 06 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79849 at http://www.oyez.org Provident Bank v. Patterson - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_28/argument-2 None Mon, 06 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79850 at http://www.oyez.org Hughes v. Washington - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_15/argument None Mon, 06 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79901 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Fred Meyer, Inc. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_27/argument None Mon, 06 Nov 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79916 at http://www.oyez.org Whitney v. Florida - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_68/argument-e None Thu, 19 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80450 at http://www.oyez.org Whitney v. Florida - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_68/argument-e None Thu, 19 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79892 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Rands - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_54/argument None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79945 at http://www.oyez.org Case-Swayne Co. v. Sunkist Growers - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_66/argument-1 None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79865 at http://www.oyez.org Massachusetts v. Painten - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_37/argument None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79926 at http://www.oyez.org Burgett v. Texas - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_53/argument None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79944 at http://www.oyez.org Case-Swayne Co. v. Sunkist Growers - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_66/argument-2 None Wed, 18 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79866 at http://www.oyez.org Will v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_36/argument-1 None Tue, 17 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79853 at http://www.oyez.org Katz v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_35/argument Acting on a suspicion that Katz was transmitting gambling information over the phone to clients in other states, Federal agents attached an eavesdropping device to the outside of a public phone booth used by Katz. Based on recordings of his end of the conversations, Katz was convicted under an eight- count indictment for the illegal transmission of wagering information from Los Angeles to Boston and Miami. On appeal, Katz challanged his conviction arguing that the recordings could not be used as evidence against him. The Court of Appeals rejected this point, noting the absence of a physical intrusion into the phone booth itself. The Court granted certiorari. Tue, 17 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53891 at http://www.oyez.org Will v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_36/argument-2 None Tue, 17 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79854 at http://www.oyez.org Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_33/argument None Tue, 17 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79922 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Flotill Products - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_20/argument None Mon, 16 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79906 at http://www.oyez.org Wyandotte Co. v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_31/argument-1 None Mon, 16 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79851 at http://www.oyez.org Whitehill v. Elkins - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_25/argument None Mon, 16 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79912 at http://www.oyez.org Wyandotte Co. v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_31/argument-2 None Mon, 16 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79852 at http://www.oyez.org Zwickler v. Koota - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_29/argument None Thu, 12 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79917 at http://www.oyez.org Longshoremen v. Marine Trade Assn. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_34/argument None Thu, 12 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79925 at http://www.oyez.org Mempa v. Rhay - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_16/argument-e None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80257 at http://www.oyez.org Mempa v. Rhay - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_16/argument-1 None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79881 at http://www.oyez.org Haynes v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_236/argument None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79910 at http://www.oyez.org Mempa v. Rhay - Oral Argument, Part incomplete-2 /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_16/argument-2 None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79882 at http://www.oyez.org Mempa v. Rhay - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_16/argument None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 80256 at http://www.oyez.org Umans v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_41/argument None Wed, 11 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79930 at http://www.oyez.org Wainwright v. City of New Orleans - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_13/argument-2 On October 12, 1964, Wainwright, a student at Tulane University Law School, was out walking around midnight. Two New Orleans Police Department officers stopped him because, in their opinion, he fitted the description of a man suspected of murder. Wainwright told the officers he had identification at home, but not on his person. The officers then asked Wainwright to remove this jacket so that they could search him for a tattoo that the suspected murdered had on his left arm. Wainwright ultimately refused to do so after trying to walk away and some mild verbal sparing. The officers then arrested him on a charge of vagrancy by loitering and frisked him. After Wainwright continued to refuse to remove his jacket at the police station, officers used force to remove it and discovered that he had no tattoo. Mon, 09 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 62253 at http://www.oyez.org Wainwright v. City of New Orleans - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_13/argument-1 On October 12, 1964, Wainwright, a student at Tulane University Law School, was out walking around midnight. Two New Orleans Police Department officers stopped him because, in their opinion, he fitted the description of a man suspected of murder. Wainwright told the officers he had identification at home, but not on his person. The officers then asked Wainwright to remove this jacket so that they could search him for a tattoo that the suspected murdered had on his left arm. Wainwright ultimately refused to do so after trying to walk away and some mild verbal sparing. The officers then arrested him on a charge of vagrancy by loitering and frisked him. After Wainwright continued to refuse to remove his jacket at the police station, officers used force to remove it and discovered that he had no tattoo. Mon, 09 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53894 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Louisiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_9_orig/argument None Mon, 09 Oct 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79890 at http://www.oyez.org Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. Trainmen - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_794/argument None Wed, 19 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68392 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Great Dane Trailers - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_781/argument None Wed, 19 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68390 at http://www.oyez.org Dusch v. Davis - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_724/argument None Tue, 18 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68387 at http://www.oyez.org Berger v. New York - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_615/argument None Thu, 13 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68372 at http://www.oyez.org American Trucking v. A., T. & S. F. R. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_57/argument None Thu, 13 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68371 at http://www.oyez.org Turner v. New York - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_399/argument-2 None Wed, 12 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68426 at http://www.oyez.org Jackson v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_575/argument None Wed, 12 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68370 at http://www.oyez.org Turner v. New York - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_399/argument-1 None Wed, 12 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68425 at http://www.oyez.org Udall v. FPC - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 462) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_463/462_argument-%29 None Tue, 11 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68429 at http://www.oyez.org Udall v. FPC - Oral Argument, Part 1 (No. 462) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_463/462_argument-%29 None Tue, 11 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68428 at http://www.oyez.org SEC v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_428/argument None Mon, 10 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68354 at http://www.oyez.org Loving v. Virginia - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_395/argument In 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia. The Lovings returned to Virginia shortly thereafter. The couple was then charged with violating the state's antimiscegenation statute, which banned inter-racial marriages. The Lovings were found guilty and sentenced to a year in jail (the trial judge agreed to suspend the sentence if the Lovings would leave Virginia and not return for 25 years). Mon, 10 Apr 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53941 at http://www.oyez.org Commissioner v. Estate Of Bosch - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_673/argument None Wed, 22 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68383 at http://www.oyez.org Specht v. Patterson - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_831/argument None Tue, 21 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68395 at http://www.oyez.org Thorpe v. Housing Authority - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_712/argument None Tue, 21 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68386 at http://www.oyez.org Bostick v. South Carolina - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_647/argument None Mon, 20 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68377 at http://www.oyez.org Reitman v. Mulkey - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_483/argument-1 None Mon, 20 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68430 at http://www.oyez.org Northeastern Nat. Bank v. U.S. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_637/argument None Mon, 20 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68374 at http://www.oyez.org Reitman v. Mulkey - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_483/argument-2 None Mon, 20 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68431 at http://www.oyez.org Prima Paint v. Flood & Conklin - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_343/argument None Thu, 16 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68345 at http://www.oyez.org Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. U.S. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_305/argument None Thu, 16 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68339 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_216/argument None Wed, 15 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68325 at http://www.oyez.org Washington v. Texas - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_649/argument-1 None Wed, 15 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68436 at http://www.oyez.org Washington v. Texas - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_649/argument-2 None Wed, 15 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68437 at http://www.oyez.org Entsminger v. State Of Iowa - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_252/argument None Wed, 15 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68333 at http://www.oyez.org Clewis v. Texas - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_648/argument None Wed, 15 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68378 at http://www.oyez.org Anders v. State Of Cal. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_98/argument None Tue, 14 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68404 at http://www.oyez.org Boutilier v. Immigration Service - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_440/argument None Tue, 14 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68356 at http://www.oyez.org Walker v. Birmingham - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_249/argument-1 Civil rights activists who planned to march on Good Friday and Easter were denied parade permits from the city. When they indicated their intention to march anyway, Birmingham obtained an injunction from a state court which ordered them to refrain from demonstrating. Marchers who defied the order, including Martin Luther King, Jr. and Ralph Abernathy, were arrested. Mon, 13 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68412 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Universal-Rundle Corp. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_101/argument None Mon, 13 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68300 at http://www.oyez.org Nowakowski v. Maroney - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_222/argument None Mon, 13 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68327 at http://www.oyez.org Walker v. Birmingham - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_249/argument-2 Civil rights activists who planned to march on Good Friday and Easter were denied parade permits from the city. When they indicated their intention to march anyway, Birmingham obtained an injunction from a state court which ordered them to refrain from demonstrating. Marchers who defied the order, including Martin Luther King, Jr. and Ralph Abernathy, were arrested. Mon, 13 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68413 at http://www.oyez.org Waldron v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_233/argument None Mon, 13 Mar 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68329 at http://www.oyez.org National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of State Of - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_241/argument None Thu, 23 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68330 at http://www.oyez.org Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_37/argument In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) the Court held that public officials in libel cases must show that a statement was made "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." These two cases concern libel as it pertains to public figures who are not public officials. Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts concerns an article published in the March 23, 1963 edition of The Saturday Evening Post alleging that former University of Georgia football coach Wallace Butts conspired with University of Alabama coach Paul "Bear" Bryant to fix a 1962 football game in Alabama's favor. The article's source was George Burnett, an Atlanta insurance salesman who had allegedly overheard a telephone conversation between the coaches. Butts brought and won a libel suit against Curtis Publishing, owner of the periodical. Soon after the Court's ruling in New York Times, Curtis moved for a new trial. The trial judge rejected the argument because Butts was not a public official. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the trial judge's decision on the basis that Curtis had waived any constitutional challenges by not raising such questions at trial. Associated Press v. Walker concerns dispatch reports of rioting that occurred on the campus of the University of Mississippi on September 30, 1962. The dispatches, authored by a correspondent on the scene, reported that Edwin A. Walker, a private citizen and political activist, had personally led a violent crowd attempting to prevent federal marshals from enforcing the court- ordered enrollment of an African-American. Walker denied the report, and filed a libel suit in the state courts of Texas. A jury found in Walker's favor, but the judge in the case refused to award punitive damages, finding that there was no malicious intent. The judge also specifically noted that New York Times was inapplicable. On appeal, the Texas Court of Civil Appeals agreed. The Supreme Court of Texas declined to hear the case. Thu, 23 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68348 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. First City Nat. Bank - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_914/argument-2 None Mon, 20 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68443 at http://www.oyez.org Afroyim v. Rusk - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_456/argument After immigrating to the United States from Poland in 1912, Beys Afroyim became a naturalized American citizen in 1926. In 1950, Afroyim went to Israel where he voted in that country's 1951 governmental elections. In 1960, Afroyim applied for renewal a of his American passport. The State Department informed him that he had forfeited his American citizenship by virtue of Section 401(e) of the 1940 Nationality Act which stipulates that citizens of the United States shall "lose" their citizenship upon voting in a foreign state's political elections. Afroyim challenged the constitutionality of Section 401(e). On appeal from a district court's summary judgment favoring Secretary of State Dean Rusk, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court granted Afroyim certiorari. Mon, 20 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 53943 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. First City Nat. Bank - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_914/argument-1 None Mon, 20 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68442 at http://www.oyez.org Dombrowski v. Eastland - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_118/argument None Mon, 20 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68306 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Wade - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_334/argument None Thu, 16 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68342 at http://www.oyez.org Stovall v. Denno - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_254/argument None Thu, 16 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68334 at http://www.oyez.org Gilbert v. California - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_223/argument-2 None Wed, 15 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68411 at http://www.oyez.org See v. City Of Seattle - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_180/argument None Wed, 15 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68320 at http://www.oyez.org Gilbert v. California - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_223/argument-1 None Wed, 15 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68410 at http://www.oyez.org Camara v. Municipal Court - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_92/argument None Wed, 15 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68402 at http://www.oyez.org State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Tashire - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_391/argument-1 None Tue, 14 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68423 at http://www.oyez.org State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Tashire - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_391/argument-2 None Tue, 14 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68424 at http://www.oyez.org Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_214/argument None Tue, 14 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68324 at http://www.oyez.org Honda v. Clark - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_164/argument None Tue, 14 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68316 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Jantzen, Inc. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_310/argument None Tue, 14 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68340 at http://www.oyez.org Crown Coat Front Co. v. U.S. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_371/argument-2 None Mon, 13 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68422 at http://www.oyez.org Railroad Trans. Service v. Chicago - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_209/argument None Mon, 13 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68323 at http://www.oyez.org Crown Coat Front Co. v. U.S. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_371/argument-1 None Mon, 13 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68421 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Procter & Gamble Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_342/argument None Mon, 13 Feb 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68344 at http://www.oyez.org Houston Contractors Assn. v. NLRB - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_206/argument None Thu, 19 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68322 at http://www.oyez.org Levin v. Mississippi River Corp. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_352/argument None Thu, 19 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68406 at http://www.oyez.org Woodwork Manufacturers v. NLRB - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_110/argument-2 None Wed, 18 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68303 at http://www.oyez.org Woodwork Manufacturers v. NLRB - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_110/argument-1 None Wed, 18 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68405 at http://www.oyez.org Grosso v. United States - Oral Reargument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_12_2/reargument-1 None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79888 at http://www.oyez.org Grosso v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_12/argument None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68408 at http://www.oyez.org Marchetti v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_2/argument-1 None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68419 at http://www.oyez.org Marchetti v. United States - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_2/reargument None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79889 at http://www.oyez.org Marchetti v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_2/argument-2 None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68420 at http://www.oyez.org Grosso v. United States - Oral Reargument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_12_2/reargument-2 None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 79837 at http://www.oyez.org Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_18/argument None Tue, 17 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68321 at http://www.oyez.org Commissioner v. Stidger - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_173/argument None Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68318 at http://www.oyez.org Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_39/argument None Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68351 at http://www.oyez.org Neely v. Eby Construction Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_12/argument-2 None Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68447 at http://www.oyez.org Toilet Goods Assn. v. Gardner - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_336/argument None Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68343 at http://www.oyez.org Neely v. Eby Construction Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_12/argument-1 None Mon, 16 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68407 at http://www.oyez.org Cascade Nat. Gas v. El Paso Nat. Gas - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_4/argument None Thu, 12 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68364 at http://www.oyez.org FPC v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_127/argument None Wed, 11 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68308 at http://www.oyez.org Miller v. Pate - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_250/argument-2 None Wed, 11 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68415 at http://www.oyez.org Mccray v. Illinois - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_159/argument None Wed, 11 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68314 at http://www.oyez.org Pierson v. Ray - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_79/argument None Wed, 11 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68311 at http://www.oyez.org Miller v. Pate - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_250/argument-1 None Wed, 11 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68414 at http://www.oyez.org B. & O. Railroad Co. v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_642/argument-1 None Mon, 09 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68434 at http://www.oyez.org B. & O. Railroad Co. v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_642/argument-2 None Mon, 09 Jan 1967 13:00:00 +0000 68435 at http://www.oyez.org Klopfer v. North Carolina - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_100/argument None Thu, 08 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68299 at http://www.oyez.org Cooper v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_103/argument None Thu, 08 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68301 at http://www.oyez.org Heider, Administrator v. Michigan Sugar Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_48/argument None Thu, 08 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68362 at http://www.oyez.org Chapman v. California - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_95/argument-1 None Wed, 07 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68444 at http://www.oyez.org Chapman v. California - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_95/argument-2 None Wed, 07 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68455 at http://www.oyez.org Whitus v. Georgia - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_650/argument None Wed, 07 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68380 at http://www.oyez.org Sims v. Georgia - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_251/argument-1 None Tue, 06 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68416 at http://www.oyez.org Swann v. Adams - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_136/argument None Tue, 06 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68312 at http://www.oyez.org In re Gault - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_116/argument Gerald Francis Gault, fifteen years old, was taken into custody for allegedly making an obscene phone call. Gault had previously been placed on probation. The police did not leave notice with Gault's parents, who were at work, when the youth was arrested. After proceedings before a juvenile court judge, Gault was committed to the State Industrial School until he reached the age of 21. Tue, 06 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53945 at http://www.oyez.org Sims v. Georgia - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_251/argument-2 None Tue, 06 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68417 at http://www.oyez.org Fortson v. Morris - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_800/argument None Mon, 05 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68393 at http://www.oyez.org Berenyi v. Immigration Director - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_66/argument-1 None Mon, 05 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68438 at http://www.oyez.org Berenyi v. Immigration Director - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_66/argument-2 None Mon, 05 Dec 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68453 at http://www.oyez.org Vaca v. Sipes - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_114/argument None Thu, 17 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68305 at http://www.oyez.org Keyishian v. Board Of Regents - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_105/argument None Thu, 17 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68302 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Laub - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_176/argument None Wed, 16 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68319 at http://www.oyez.org Lassen v. Arizona Highway Dept. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_84/argument None Wed, 16 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68396 at http://www.oyez.org Woodby v. Immigration Service - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_40/argument-1 None Wed, 16 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68427 at http://www.oyez.org Woodby v. Immigration Service - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_40/argument-2 None Wed, 16 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68450 at http://www.oyez.org Travis v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_67/argument-2 None Tue, 15 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68454 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. C & C Plywood Corp. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_53/argument None Tue, 15 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68368 at http://www.oyez.org Travis v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_67/argument-1 None Tue, 15 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68439 at http://www.oyez.org Dept. Of Employment v. U.S. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_78/argument None Tue, 15 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68391 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Robel - Oral Reargument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_8/reargument-e None Mon, 14 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80479 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Robel - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_8/argument None Mon, 14 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68400 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Robel - Oral Reargument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_8/reargument-e None Mon, 14 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 79893 at http://www.oyez.org NLRB v. Acme Industrial Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_52/argument None Mon, 14 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68367 at http://www.oyez.org Walker v. Southern R. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_89/argument None Thu, 10 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68399 at http://www.oyez.org Garrity v. New Jersey - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_13/argument None Thu, 10 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68313 at http://www.oyez.org Bond v. Floyd - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_87/argument None Thu, 10 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68398 at http://www.oyez.org Long v. District Court Of Iowa - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_77/argument None Wed, 09 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68389 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Acme Process Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_86/argument None Wed, 09 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68397 at http://www.oyez.org Parker v. Gladden - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_81/argument None Wed, 09 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68394 at http://www.oyez.org Watkins v. Conway - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_65/argument None Wed, 09 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68381 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Demko - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_76/argument None Tue, 08 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68388 at http://www.oyez.org Canada Packers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., et al - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_11/argument-1 None Tue, 08 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68445 at http://www.oyez.org Canada Packers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., et al - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_11/argument-2 None Tue, 08 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68446 at http://www.oyez.org First Nat. Bank v. Walker Bank - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_51/argument-1 None Mon, 07 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68433 at http://www.oyez.org Spevack v. Klein - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_62/argument The New York Bar charged Samuel Spevack, an attorney from New York, with professional misconduct because he refused to produce financial records and testify at a judicial inquiry. In his defense, Spevack claimed his constitutional right against self-incrimination, and stated that the records and testimony would tend to incriminate him. The New York appellate court rejected Spevack’s defense and ordered Spevack disbarred, holding that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was not available to attorneys against states. Mon, 07 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68373 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Fabrizio - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_47/argument None Mon, 07 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68360 at http://www.oyez.org First Nat. Bank v. Walker Bank - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_51/argument-2 None Mon, 07 Nov 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68452 at http://www.oyez.org Immigration Service v. Errico - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_54/argument None Thu, 20 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68369 at http://www.oyez.org Bank Of Marin v. England - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_63/argument None Thu, 20 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68375 at http://www.oyez.org Cichos v. Indiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_45/argument None Wed, 19 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68357 at http://www.oyez.org Transportation Union v. U. P. R. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_28/argument None Wed, 19 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68336 at http://www.oyez.org United Gas Pipe Line v. FPC - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_49/argument-2 None Wed, 19 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68451 at http://www.oyez.org United Gas Pipe Line v. FPC - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_49/argument-1 None Wed, 19 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68432 at http://www.oyez.org Adderley v. Florida - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_19/argument Harriet Louise Adderley and a group of approximately 200 others assembled in a non-public jail driveway to protest the arrests of fellow students and the state and local policies of racial segregation which included segregation in jails. Adderley and thirty-one others were convicted in a Florida court on a charge of "trespass with a malicious and mischievous intent" for their refusal to leave the driveway when requested to do so. Tue, 18 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53944 at http://www.oyez.org Spencer v. Texas - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_68/argument-1 None Mon, 17 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68440 at http://www.oyez.org Spencer v. Texas - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_68/argument-2 None Mon, 17 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68441 at http://www.oyez.org Lewis v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_36/argument None Mon, 17 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68346 at http://www.oyez.org Switzerland Assn. v. Horne's Market - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_42/argument None Mon, 17 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68355 at http://www.oyez.org Hoffa v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_32/argument None Thu, 13 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68341 at http://www.oyez.org Osborn v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_29/argument-2 None Wed, 12 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68449 at http://www.oyez.org Giles v. Maryland - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_27/argument None Wed, 12 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68335 at http://www.oyez.org Osborn v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_29/argument-1 None Wed, 12 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68418 at http://www.oyez.org Illinois C. R. Co. v. Norfolk & W. R. Co. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_15/argument None Tue, 11 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68315 at http://www.oyez.org Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_220/argument None Mon, 10 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68326 at http://www.oyez.org Redrup v. New York - Oral Argument (No. 50) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_3/50_argument None Mon, 10 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68365 at http://www.oyez.org Redrup v. New York - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 16) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_3/16_argument-%29 None Mon, 10 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68448 at http://www.oyez.org Redrup v. New York - Oral Argument, Part 1 (No. 16) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_3/16_argument-%29 None Mon, 10 Oct 1966 13:00:00 +0000 68409 at http://www.oyez.org Ashton v. Kentucky - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_619/argument None Thu, 28 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80425 at http://www.oyez.org Davis v. North Carolina - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_815/argument None Thu, 28 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80475 at http://www.oyez.org Time Inc. v. Hill - Oral Reargument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_22/reargument-2 In 1952, three escaped convicts took James Hill, his wife, and their five children hostage in their Whitemarsh, Pennsylvania, home. After nineteen hours, the family was released unharmed. The convicts were later apprehended in a violent clash with police during which two of them were killed. In 1953, Joseph Hays' published a novel based on the Hill family's ordeal. When the novel was subsequently made into a play, Life Magazine ("Life") printed an article about the play that mirrored many of its inaccuracies concerning the Hill family's experience. Alleging that it deliberately misrepresented his story, Hill sought damages against Life. On appeal from an adverse ruling, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court remanded for a new trial where a reduced adverse ruling was imposed on Life. Following an unsuccessful appeal in the New York Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court granted Life's owner, Time Inc. ("Time") certiorari. Wed, 27 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62319 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Pabst Brewing Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_404/argument None Wed, 27 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80342 at http://www.oyez.org Time Inc. v. Hill - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_22/argument In 1952, three escaped convicts took James Hill, his wife, and their five children hostage in their Whitemarsh, Pennsylvania, home. After nineteen hours, the family was released unharmed. The convicts were later apprehended in a violent clash with police during which two of them were killed. In 1953, Joseph Hays' published a novel based on the Hill family's ordeal. When the novel was subsequently made into a play, Life Magazine ("Life") printed an article about the play that mirrored many of its inaccuracies concerning the Hill family's experience. Alleging that it deliberately misrepresented his story, Hill sought damages against Life. On appeal from an adverse ruling, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court remanded for a new trial where a reduced adverse ruling was imposed on Life. Following an unsuccessful appeal in the New York Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court granted Life's owner, Time Inc. ("Time") certiorari. Wed, 27 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53939 at http://www.oyez.org Time Inc. v. Hill - Oral Reargument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_22/reargument-1 In 1952, three escaped convicts took James Hill, his wife, and their five children hostage in their Whitemarsh, Pennsylvania, home. After nineteen hours, the family was released unharmed. The convicts were later apprehended in a violent clash with police during which two of them were killed. In 1953, Joseph Hays' published a novel based on the Hill family's ordeal. When the novel was subsequently made into a play, Life Magazine ("Life") printed an article about the play that mirrored many of its inaccuracies concerning the Hill family's experience. Alleging that it deliberately misrepresented his story, Hill sought damages against Life. On appeal from an adverse ruling, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court remanded for a new trial where a reduced adverse ruling was imposed on Life. Following an unsuccessful appeal in the New York Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court granted Life's owner, Time Inc. ("Time") certiorari. Wed, 27 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62317 at http://www.oyez.org Greenwood v. Peacock - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_471/argument None Tue, 26 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80366 at http://www.oyez.org Schmerber v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_658/argument Schmerber had been arrested for drunk driving while receiving treatment for injuries in a hospital. During his treatment, a police officer ordered a doctor to take a blood sample which indicated that Schmerber had been drunk while driving. The blood test was introduced as evidence in court and Schmerber was convicted. Mon, 25 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53930 at http://www.oyez.org Georgia v. Rachel - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_147/argument-2 None Mon, 25 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80247 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Brown Shoe Co. - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_118/argument-e None Mon, 25 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80227 at http://www.oyez.org Georgia v. Rachel - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_147/argument-1 None Mon, 25 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80246 at http://www.oyez.org Rinaldi v. Yeager - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_940/argument None Thu, 21 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80497 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Equitable Life - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_645/argument None Thu, 21 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80437 at http://www.oyez.org Gojack v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_594/argument None Thu, 21 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80416 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Blue - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_531/argument None Thu, 21 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80393 at http://www.oyez.org Dennis v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_502/argument Raymond Dennis and others were members of the Communist Party; they were also officers and members of the International Union of Mine, Mill, and Smelter Workers. They filed false affidavits between 1949 and 1955 to satisfy the stipulations of 9(h) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended by the Taft-Hartley Act, which required all union officers to submit non-Communist affidavits. The union officials retained their Communist Party affiliations, filed the affidavits, and enabled the union to use the services of the National Labor Relations Board. The union officers were indicted by the United States District Court for conspiracy to fraudulently obtain the services of the National Labor Relations Board. Wed, 20 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80381 at http://www.oyez.org Railway Clerks v. Florida E. C. R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_750/argument None Wed, 20 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80465 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Cook - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_256/argument None Tue, 19 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80290 at http://www.oyez.org Pure Oil Co. v. Suarez - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_692/argument None Tue, 19 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80454 at http://www.oyez.org Nicholas v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_650/argument None Tue, 19 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80438 at http://www.oyez.org Mills v. Alabama - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_597/argument None Tue, 19 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80417 at http://www.oyez.org Cardona v. Power - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_673/argument None Mon, 18 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80448 at http://www.oyez.org Katzenbach v. Morgan - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_847/argument-e New York voters sought declaratory judgment in a New York federal district court to prevent compliance with Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. That section provided that no person who successfully completed the sixth grade in a school accredited by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in which the language of instruction was other than English shall be denied the right to vote in any election because of his inability to read or write English. The plaintiffs argued that Section 4(e) prevented the enforcement of New York election laws which required an ability to read and write English as a condition of voting. A three-judge panel of the district court granted declaratory judgment and prevented enforcement of Section 4(e). It held that Congress exceeded its constitutionally designated powers in enacting Section 4(e) and usurped the powers reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment. Mon, 18 Apr 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80484 at http://www.oyez.org NAACP v. Overstreet - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_505/argument None Tue, 29 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80382 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Grinnell Corp. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_73/argument-2 None Mon, 28 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80464 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Dean Foods Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_970/argument None Mon, 28 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80500 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Grinnell Corp. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_73/argument-1 None Mon, 28 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80463 at http://www.oyez.org Collier v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_695/argument None Thu, 24 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80456 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Utah Constr. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_440/argument-1 None Wed, 23 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80355 at http://www.oyez.org SEC v. New England Electric - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_636/argument None Wed, 23 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80436 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Utah Constr. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_440/argument-2 None Wed, 23 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80356 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Grace & Sons - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_439/argument None Wed, 23 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80354 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Catto - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_535/argument-1 None Tue, 22 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80395 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Von's Grocery Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_303/argument None Tue, 22 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80305 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Catto - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_535/argument-2 None Tue, 22 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80396 at http://www.oyez.org Brookhart v. Janis - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_657/argument-2 None Mon, 21 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80443 at http://www.oyez.org Holt v. Alleghany Corp. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_131/argument None Mon, 21 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80234 at http://www.oyez.org Brookhart v. Janis - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_657/argument-1 None Mon, 21 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80442 at http://www.oyez.org Malat v. Riddell - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_487/argument None Thu, 03 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80373 at http://www.oyez.org Cheff v. Schnackenberg - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_67/argument None Thu, 03 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80447 at http://www.oyez.org Shillitani v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_412/argument None Wed, 02 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80345 at http://www.oyez.org Johnson v. New Jersey - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_762/argument-1 None Tue, 01 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80468 at http://www.oyez.org Johnson v. New Jersey - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_762/argument-2 None Tue, 01 Mar 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80469 at http://www.oyez.org Vignera v. New York (No. 760) - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_759/760_argument The Court was called upon to consider the constitutionality of a number of instances, ruled on jointly, in which defendants were questioned "while in custody or otherwise deprived of [their] freedom in any significant way." In Vignera v. New York, the petitioner was questioned by police, made oral admissions, and signed an inculpatory statement all without being notified of his right to counsel. Similarly, in Westover v. United States, the petitioner was arrested by the FBI, interrogated, and made to sign statements without being notified of his right to counsel. Lastly, in California v. Stewart, local police held and interrogated the defendant for five days without notification of his right to counsel. In all these cases, suspects were questioned by police officers, detectives, or prosecuting attorneys in rooms that cut them off from the outside world. In none of the cases were suspects given warnings of their rights at the outset of their interrogation. Mon, 28 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62201 at http://www.oyez.org Miranda v. Arizona - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_759/argument The Court was called upon to consider the constitutionality of a number of instances, ruled on jointly, in which defendants were questioned "while in custody or otherwise deprived of [their] freedom in any significant way." In Vignera v. New York, the petitioner was questioned by police, made oral admissions, and signed an inculpatory statement all without being notified of his right to counsel. Similarly, in Westover v. United States, the petitioner was arrested by the FBI, interrogated, and made to sign statements without being notified of his right to counsel. Lastly, in California v. Stewart, local police held and interrogated the defendant for five days without notification of his right to counsel. In all these cases, suspects were questioned by police officers, detectives, or prosecuting attorneys in rooms that cut them off from the outside world. In none of the cases were suspects given warnings of their rights at the outset of their interrogation. Mon, 28 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53932 at http://www.oyez.org Stewart v. California (No. 584) - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_759/584_argument The Court was called upon to consider the constitutionality of a number of instances, ruled on jointly, in which defendants were questioned "while in custody or otherwise deprived of [their] freedom in any significant way." In Vignera v. New York, the petitioner was questioned by police, made oral admissions, and signed an inculpatory statement all without being notified of his right to counsel. Similarly, in Westover v. United States, the petitioner was arrested by the FBI, interrogated, and made to sign statements without being notified of his right to counsel. Lastly, in California v. Stewart, local police held and interrogated the defendant for five days without notification of his right to counsel. In all these cases, suspects were questioned by police officers, detectives, or prosecuting attorneys in rooms that cut them off from the outside world. In none of the cases were suspects given warnings of their rights at the outset of their interrogation. Mon, 28 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 64796 at http://www.oyez.org Westover v. United States (No. 761) - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_759/761_argument The Court was called upon to consider the constitutionality of a number of instances, ruled on jointly, in which defendants were questioned "while in custody or otherwise deprived of [their] freedom in any significant way." In Vignera v. New York, the petitioner was questioned by police, made oral admissions, and signed an inculpatory statement all without being notified of his right to counsel. Similarly, in Westover v. United States, the petitioner was arrested by the FBI, interrogated, and made to sign statements without being notified of his right to counsel. Lastly, in California v. Stewart, local police held and interrogated the defendant for five days without notification of his right to counsel. In all these cases, suspects were questioned by police officers, detectives, or prosecuting attorneys in rooms that cut them off from the outside world. In none of the cases were suspects given warnings of their rights at the outset of their interrogation. Mon, 28 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62202 at http://www.oyez.org Sheppard v. Maxwell - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_490/argument After suffering a trial court conviction of second-degree murder for the bludgeoning death of his pregnant wife, Samuel Sheppard challenged the verdict as the product of an unfair trial. Sheppard, who maintained his innocence of the crime, alleged that the trial judge failed to protect him from the massive, widespread, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution. On appeal from an Ohio district court ruling supporting his claim, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. When Sheppard appealed again, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Mon, 28 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53933 at http://www.oyez.org Elfbrandt v. Russell - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_656/argument None Thu, 24 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80441 at http://www.oyez.org Degregory v. New Hamp. Atty. Gen. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_396/argument None Thu, 24 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80336 at http://www.oyez.org Wallis v. Pan American Pet. Corp. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_341/argument-1 None Wed, 23 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80318 at http://www.oyez.org Wallis v. Pan American Pet. Corp. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_341/argument-2 None Wed, 23 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80319 at http://www.oyez.org Seagram & Sons v. Hostetter - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_545/argument None Wed, 23 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80400 at http://www.oyez.org Burns v. Richardson - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_318/argument None Mon, 21 Feb 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80311 at http://www.oyez.org Commissioner v. Tellier - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_351/argument-e None Thu, 27 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80321 at http://www.oyez.org Auto Workers v. Hoosier Corp. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_387/argument None Thu, 27 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80332 at http://www.oyez.org Pate v. Robinson - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_382/argument None Wed, 26 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80331 at http://www.oyez.org Perry v. Commerce Loan Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_694/argument None Wed, 26 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80455 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Standard Oil Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_291/argument None Tue, 25 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80301 at http://www.oyez.org Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_48/argument-1 Annie E. Harper, a resident of Virginia, filed suit alleging that the state's poll tax was unconstitutional. After a three-judge district court dismissed the complaint, the case went to the Supreme Court. This case was decided together with Butts v. Harrison. Tue, 25 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53935 at http://www.oyez.org Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_48/argument-2 Annie E. Harper, a resident of Virginia, filed suit alleging that the state's poll tax was unconstitutional. After a three-judge district court dismissed the complaint, the case went to the Supreme Court. This case was decided together with Butts v. Harrison. Tue, 25 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53936 at http://www.oyez.org Stevens v. Marks - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_210/argument None Mon, 24 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80269 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. O'malley - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_127/argument-1 None Mon, 24 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80231 at http://www.oyez.org Amell v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_282/argument None Mon, 24 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80296 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. O'malley - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_127/argument-2 None Mon, 24 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80232 at http://www.oyez.org Accardi v. Pennsylvania R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_280/argument None Thu, 20 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80294 at http://www.oyez.org Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_161/argument None Thu, 20 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80252 at http://www.oyez.org Mine Workers v. Gibbs - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_243/argument None Thu, 20 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80285 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Borden Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_106/argument None Wed, 19 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80211 at http://www.oyez.org Kent v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_104/argument None Wed, 19 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 80210 at http://www.oyez.org South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_22_orig/argument-1 The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prevented states from using a "test or device" (such as literacy tests) to deny citizens the right to vote. Federal examiners, under the Attorney General's jurisdiction, were empowered to intervene to investigate election irregularities. Mon, 17 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53937 at http://www.oyez.org South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_22_orig/argument-2 The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prevented states from using a "test or device" (such as literacy tests) to deny citizens the right to vote. Federal examiners, under the Attorney General's jurisdiction, were empowered to intervene to investigate election irregularities. Mon, 17 Jan 1966 13:00:00 +0000 53938 at http://www.oyez.org Baxstrom v. Herold - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_219/argument None Thu, 09 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80276 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. General Motors - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_46/argument None Thu, 09 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80361 at http://www.oyez.org Engineers v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_69/argument-2 None Wed, 08 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80453 at http://www.oyez.org Idaho Metal Works v. Wirtz - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_30/argument None Wed, 08 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80304 at http://www.oyez.org Engineers v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_69/argument-1 None Wed, 08 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80452 at http://www.oyez.org Ginzburg v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_42/argument Ralph Ginzburg and several of his associates were charged with violating a federal obscenity statute for mailing circulars about how and where three different obscene publications could be obtained. Ginzburg challenged his conviction as unconstitutional since the circulars themselves were not obscene. On appeal from an adverse ruling by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, upholding an unfavorable lower court finding, the Supreme Court granted Ginzburg certiorari. Tue, 07 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 53931 at http://www.oyez.org Memoirs v. Massachusetts - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_368/argument-1 A special provision of Massachusetts law allowed the Attorney General to initiate legal proceedings against an "obscene" book, Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure. The book, also known as Fanny Hill, was written by John Cleland in about 1750. Massachusetts courts, despite the defenses put forward by the book's publisher and copyright holder, judged the work to be obscene. Tue, 07 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 53928 at http://www.oyez.org Mishkin v. New York - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_49/argument None Tue, 07 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80379 at http://www.oyez.org Memoirs v. Massachusetts - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_368/argument-2 A special provision of Massachusetts law allowed the Attorney General to initiate legal proceedings against an "obscene" book, Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure. The book, also known as Fanny Hill, was written by John Cleland in about 1750. Massachusetts courts, despite the defenses put forward by the book's publisher and copyright holder, judged the work to be obscene. Tue, 07 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 53929 at http://www.oyez.org Brown v. Louisiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_41/argument The Audubon Regional library operated three branches and two bookmobiles. Blacks were not allowed to enter any of the branch libraries. The bookmobiles were segregated: a red one served only whites and a blue one served blacks. Brown was a black man who entered a library branch with four other blacks and requested a book, The Story of the Negro. The librarian informed Brown that the book was not available, but that she would request it through the state library, and he could pick it up or have it mailed to him. After the conversation, the men sat down (making no noise or disturbance) and refused to leave. They were arrested "for not leaving a public building when asked to do so by an officer." Mon, 06 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 53934 at http://www.oyez.org Giaccio v. Pennsylvania - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_47/argument None Mon, 06 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80367 at http://www.oyez.org Icc v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_14/argument None Mon, 06 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80241 at http://www.oyez.org Consolo v. Federal Maritime Comm'n - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_63/argument-1 None Mon, 06 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80434 at http://www.oyez.org Consolo v. Federal Maritime Comm'n - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_63/argument-2 None Mon, 06 Dec 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80435 at http://www.oyez.org Linn v. Plant Guard Workers - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_45/argument None Thu, 18 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80359 at http://www.oyez.org Tehan v. Shott - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_52/argument None Thu, 18 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80391 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Ewell - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_29/argument None Thu, 18 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80302 at http://www.oyez.org Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Brenner - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_57/argument None Wed, 17 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80407 at http://www.oyez.org Segal v. Rochelle - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_44/argument None Wed, 17 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80357 at http://www.oyez.org Brenner v. Manson - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_58/argument None Wed, 17 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80410 at http://www.oyez.org Louisiana v. Mississippi - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_14_orig/argument None Tue, 16 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80248 at http://www.oyez.org California v. Buzard - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_40/argument None Tue, 16 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80340 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Huck Manufacturing Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_8/argument None Mon, 15 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80478 at http://www.oyez.org Snapp v. Neal - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_16/argument-1 None Mon, 15 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80254 at http://www.oyez.org Snapp v. Neal - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_16/argument-2 None Mon, 15 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80255 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Johnson - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_25/argument-2 None Wed, 10 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80289 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Johnson - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_25/argument-1 None Wed, 10 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80288 at http://www.oyez.org Fribourg Nav. Co. v. Commissioner - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_23/argument None Wed, 10 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80281 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Price - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_59/argument None Tue, 09 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80415 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Guest - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_65/argument On July 11, 1964 Lt. Col. Lemuel Penn was shot and killed by three members of the Ku Klux Klan while driving home from Washington, D.C. The alleged shooters, James Lackey, Cecil Myers, and Howard Sims, were indicted but acquitted by an all-white jury. Following the acquittal, the three defendants were indicted on charges of conspiracy to threaten, abuse, and kill African- Americans. Three alleged co-conspirators, Denver Phillips, George Turner, and Herbert Guest, were also charged. U.S. Code defines criminal conspiracy as two or more individuals conspiring to "injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States." The indictment filed against the six alleged conspirators accused them of acting to deny African-Americans full and equal enjoyment and utilization of goods and services, including access to state highways and free travel to and from Georgia on public streets. The defendants moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that it did not allege a specific denial of rights under U.S. law. The district court agreed, and dismissed the indictment. The prosecution appealed, arguing that the indictment alleged, in part, a denial of rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Tue, 09 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80440 at http://www.oyez.org Evans v. Newton - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_61/argument-1 None Tue, 09 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80423 at http://www.oyez.org Evans v. Newton - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_61/argument-2 None Tue, 09 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80424 at http://www.oyez.org Gunther v. San Diego & A. E. R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_27/argument None Mon, 08 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80293 at http://www.oyez.org Katchen v. Landy - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_28/argument None Mon, 08 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80295 at http://www.oyez.org Carnation Co. v. Pacific Conference - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_20/argument-e None Mon, 08 Nov 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80267 at http://www.oyez.org Steelworkers v. Bouligny, Inc. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_19/argument None Thu, 21 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80265 at http://www.oyez.org Ftc v. Mary Carter Paint Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_15/argument None Thu, 21 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80251 at http://www.oyez.org Hicks v. District Of Columbia - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_51/argument None Thu, 21 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80386 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Speers - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_17/argument None Wed, 20 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80258 at http://www.oyez.org Auto Workers v. Scofield - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_18/argument None Wed, 20 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80262 at http://www.oyez.org Rosenblatt v. Baer - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_38/argument None Wed, 20 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80330 at http://www.oyez.org Western Pac. R. Co. v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_12/argument None Tue, 19 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80230 at http://www.oyez.org United Gas v. Callery Properties - Oral Argument (No. 3) /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_21/3_argument None Mon, 18 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80314 at http://www.oyez.org United Gas v. Callery Properties - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_21/argument-1 None Mon, 18 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80272 at http://www.oyez.org United Gas v. Callery Properties - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_21/argument-2 None Mon, 18 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80273 at http://www.oyez.org Graham v. John Deere Co. - Oral Argument (No. 37) /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_11/37_argument Graham v. John Deere Co. was a suit for the infringement of a patent that consisted of a combination of old mechanical elements for a device designed to absorb shock from plow shanks in rocky soil in order to prevent damage to the plow. In 1955, the Fifth Circuit held the patent valid, ruling that a combination is patentable when it produces an "old result in a cheaper and otherwise more advantageous way." Subsequently, the Eighth Circuit held that, since there was no new result in the combination, the patent was invalid. The parties in Calmar, Inc. v. Cook Chemical Co. (No. 37) and Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Cook Chemical Co. (No. 43) sought a declaration of invalidity and noninfringement of a patent on finger-operated sprayers with a "hold-down" cap issued to Cook Chemical. The District Court and the Court of Appeals sustained the patent. Thu, 14 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80328 at http://www.oyez.org Graham v. John Deere Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_11/argument Graham v. John Deere Co. was a suit for the infringement of a patent that consisted of a combination of old mechanical elements for a device designed to absorb shock from plow shanks in rocky soil in order to prevent damage to the plow. In 1955, the Fifth Circuit held the patent valid, ruling that a combination is patentable when it produces an "old result in a cheaper and otherwise more advantageous way." Subsequently, the Eighth Circuit held that, since there was no new result in the combination, the patent was invalid. The parties in Calmar, Inc. v. Cook Chemical Co. (No. 37) and Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Cook Chemical Co. (No. 43) sought a declaration of invalidity and noninfringement of a patent on finger-operated sprayers with a "hold-down" cap issued to Cook Chemical. The District Court and the Court of Appeals sustained the patent. Thu, 14 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80220 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Romano - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_2/argument None Thu, 14 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80277 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Adams - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_55/argument None Thu, 14 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80401 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Yazell - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_10/argument None Wed, 13 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80208 at http://www.oyez.org Swift & Co. v. Wickham - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_9/argument None Wed, 13 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80495 at http://www.oyez.org Walker, Inc. v. Food Machinery - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_13/argument None Tue, 12 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80236 at http://www.oyez.org Hanna Mining v. Marine Engineers - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_7/argument None Tue, 12 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80460 at http://www.oyez.org Harris v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_6/argument-2 None Mon, 11 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80429 at http://www.oyez.org Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_5/argument None Mon, 11 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80389 at http://www.oyez.org Leh v. General Petroleum Corp. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_4/argument None Mon, 11 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80347 at http://www.oyez.org Harris v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_6/argument-1 None Mon, 11 Oct 1965 13:00:00 +0000 80428 at http://www.oyez.org Griswold v. Connecticut - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_496/argument-2 Griswold was the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. Both she and the Medical Director for the League gave information, instruction, and other medical advice to married couples concerning birth control. Griswold and her colleague were convicted under a Connecticut law which criminalized the provision of counselling, and other medical treatment, to married persons for purposes of preventing conception. Mon, 29 Mar 1965 13:00:00 +0000 53920 at http://www.oyez.org Griswold v. Connecticut - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_496/argument-1 Griswold was the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. Both she and the Medical Director for the League gave information, instruction, and other medical advice to married couples concerning birth control. Griswold and her colleague were convicted under a Connecticut law which criminalized the provision of counselling, and other medical treatment, to married persons for purposes of preventing conception. Mon, 29 Mar 1965 13:00:00 +0000 53919 at http://www.oyez.org Linkletter v. Walker - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_95/argument Victor Linkletter was convicted in state court on evidence illegally obtained by police prior to the Supreme Court decision concerning the Fourth Amendment in Mapp v. Ohio. Mapp applied the exclusionary rule to state criminal proceedings, denying the use of illegally obtained evidence at trial. Linkletter argued for a retrial based on the Mapp decision. Thu, 11 Mar 1965 13:00:00 +0000 53925 at http://www.oyez.org Freedman v. Maryland - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_69/argument Maryland required that all films be submitted to a board of censors before being exhibited. The board could disapprove films that were obscene, debased or corrupted morals, or tended to incite crime. There was no time limit on the decision-making process. Ronald Freedman challenged the law as unconstitutional due to the procedures to obtain approval. He did not suggest that prior approval itself was unconstitutional. Thu, 19 Nov 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53927 at http://www.oyez.org El Paso v. Simmons - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_38/argument Since the late 19th century, Texas sold land to facilitate settlement in the state and construction of schools. If, however, a purchaser missed an interest payment on the property, the land was immediately forfeited back to the state unless the owner made the payment before the land could be re-sold. Under this program, Greenbury Simmons purchased and then forfeited some land in 1947. Just over five years later he offered to pay the interest to re-acquire the property. The state refused to comply with his wishes citing a 1941 amendment to its law which gave individuals five years to claim their forfeited land. Simmons's land was sold to the City of El Paso in 1955. Tue, 17 Nov 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53922 at http://www.oyez.org Cox v. Louisiana - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_24/argument On the morning of December 15, 1961, Elton Cox led a some 2000 students on an anti-discrimination march that ended in a large assembly before the Baton Rouge, Louisiana, courthouse building. Following police instructions, the demonstrators confined themselves to the west side of the street so as not to interfere with traffic. As the lunch hour neared, Cox encouraged the demonstrators to seek service at any one of several near-by segregated lunch counters. Upon hearing this, the police urged the crowd to disband and began pushing them away from the courthouse. When the demonstrators resisted, police showered them with tear gas and chased them away. The following day, Louisiana police arrested and charged Cox with "disturbing the peace." On appeal from the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision upholding an adverse district court ruling, the Supreme Court granted Cox certiorari. Wed, 21 Oct 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53921 at http://www.oyez.org Hamm v. Rock Hill - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_2/argument None Mon, 12 Oct 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53924 at http://www.oyez.org Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_515/argument Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbade racial discrimination by places of public accommodation if their operations affected commerce. The Heart of Atlanta Motel in Atlanta, Georgia, refused to accept Black Americans and was charged with violating Title II. Mon, 05 Oct 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53923 at http://www.oyez.org Katzenbach v. McClung - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_543/argument The owner of Ollie's Barbecue, in Birmingham Alabama, refused to serve blacks in apparent violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Part of the Act prevented restaurants serving interstate travelers, or receiving a substantial amount of their food from interstate commerce, from discriminating on the basis of race. Mon, 05 Oct 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53926 at http://www.oyez.org Escobedo v. Illinois - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_615/argument Danny Escobedo was arrested and taken to a police station for questioning. Over several hours, the police refused his repeated requests to see his lawyer. Escobedo's lawyer sought unsuccessfully to consult with his client. Escobedo subsequently confessed to murder. Wed, 29 Apr 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53906 at http://www.oyez.org Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_508/argument-1 Acting on behalf of several voters in the Denver area, Andres Lucas sued various officials connected with Colorado's elections challenging the apportionment of seats in both houses of the Colorado General Assembly. Under Colorado's apportionment plan, the House of Representatives was apportioned on the basis of population but the apportionment of the Senate was based on a combination of population and other factors (geography, compactness and contiguity, accessibility, natural boundaries, and conformity to historical divisions). Consequently, counties with only about one-third of the State's total population would elect a majority of the Senate; the maximum population- variance ratio would be about 3.6-to-1; and the chief metropolitan areas, with over two-thirds of the State's population, could elect only a bare majority of the Senate. When a three-judge District Court upheld the plan, stressing its recent approval by the electorate, the Supreme Court granted Lucas certiorari. Tue, 31 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53913 at http://www.oyez.org Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_508/argument-2 Acting on behalf of several voters in the Denver area, Andres Lucas sued various officials connected with Colorado's elections challenging the apportionment of seats in both houses of the Colorado General Assembly. Under Colorado's apportionment plan, the House of Representatives was apportioned on the basis of population but the apportionment of the Senate was based on a combination of population and other factors (geography, compactness and contiguity, accessibility, natural boundaries, and conformity to historical divisions). Consequently, counties with only about one-third of the State's total population would elect a majority of the Senate; the maximum population- variance ratio would be about 3.6-to-1; and the chief metropolitan areas, with over two-thirds of the State's population, could elect only a bare majority of the Senate. When a three-judge District Court upheld the plan, stressing its recent approval by the electorate, the Supreme Court granted Lucas certiorari. Tue, 31 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53914 at http://www.oyez.org Griffin v. School Board - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_592/argument-2 None Mon, 30 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 66836 at http://www.oyez.org Griffin v. School Board - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_592/argument-1 None Mon, 30 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 66833 at http://www.oyez.org Malloy v. Hogan - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_110/argument William Malloy was arrested during a gambling raid in 1959 by Hartford, Connecticut police. After pleading guilty to pool selling, a misdemeanor, he was sentenced to one year in jail and fined $500, but the sentence was suspended after 90 days and Malloy was placed on two years probation. Some 16 months following his plea, a Superior Court appointed referee ordered Malloy to testify about gambling and other criminal activities in Hartford County. When Malloy refused, "on grounds it may tend to incriminate [him]" he was imprisoned for contempt and held until willing to answer questions. Malloy filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his confinement. On appeal from the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors ruling, upholding an adverse Superior Court denial, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Thu, 05 Mar 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53918 at http://www.oyez.org New York Times v. Sullivan - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_39/argument Decided together with Abernathy v. Sullivan, this case concerns a full-page ad in the New York Times which alleged that the arrest of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. for perjury in Alabama was part of a campaign to destroy King's efforts to integrate public facilities and encourage blacks to vote. L. B. Sullivan, the Montgomery city commissioner, filed a libel action against the newspaper and four black ministers who were listed as endorsers of the ad, claiming that the allegations against the Montgomery police defamed him personally. Under Alabama law, Sullivan did not have to prove that he had been harmed; and a defense claiming that the ad was truthful was unavailable since the ad contained factual errors. Sullivan won a $500,000 judgment. Mon, 06 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 53912 at http://www.oyez.org New York Times v. Sullivan - Oral Argument (No. 40) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_39/40_argument Decided together with Abernathy v. Sullivan, this case concerns a full-page ad in the New York Times which alleged that the arrest of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. for perjury in Alabama was part of a campaign to destroy King's efforts to integrate public facilities and encourage blacks to vote. L. B. Sullivan, the Montgomery city commissioner, filed a libel action against the newspaper and four black ministers who were listed as endorsers of the ad, claiming that the allegations against the Montgomery police defamed him personally. Under Alabama law, Sullivan did not have to prove that he had been harmed; and a defense claiming that the ad was truthful was unavailable since the ad contained factual errors. Sullivan won a $500,000 judgment. Mon, 06 Jan 1964 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62187 at http://www.oyez.org Roman v. Sincock - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_307/argument Following the Supreme Court's decision in Baker v. Carr (369 U.S. 186) Richard Sincock and several other New Castle County residents, taxpayers, and qualified voters, challenged the constitutionality of Delaware's apportionment scheme. The suit alleged that under Delaware's 1897 state constitution, no provisions existed for reapportionment that would reflect the changing demographic face of New Castle County and the City of Wilmington. On a appeal from a three-judge district court ruling against the state of Delaware, the Supreme Court granted Mabel Roman, Delaware's elections clerk, certiorari. Mon, 09 Dec 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53917 at http://www.oyez.org Wesberry v. Sanders - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_22/argument James P. Wesberry, Jr. filed a suit against the Governor of Georgia, Carl E. Sanders, protesting the state's apportionment scheme. The Fifth Congressional District, of which Wesberry was a member, had a population two to three times larger than some of the other districts in the state. Wesberry claimed this system diluted his right to vote compared to other Georgia residents. Mon, 18 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53916 at http://www.oyez.org Davis v. Mann - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_69/argument Acting on behalf of residents, taxpayers, and qualified voters in Arlington and Fairfax County, Virginia, Harrison Mann challenged Virginia's 1962 amended statutory apportionment scheme as unrepresentative. Harrison called for a redistribution of legislative representation among the counties and independent cities of the state "substantially in proportion to their respective populations." When Levin Davis appealed an adverse three-judge district court ruling on behalf of Virginia's Secretary and State Board of Elections, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Thu, 14 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53911 at http://www.oyez.org Maryland Committee v. Tawes - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_29/argument-1 Under its 1867 Constitution, the State of Maryland's Senate has 29 seats, one for each of 23 counties and six for the City of Baltimore's legislative districts. The State's five most populous political subdivisions with over three-fourths of the 1960 population are represented by only slightly over one-third of the Senate's membership. In the House of Delegates, after temporary legislation in 1962, there existed a maximum population-variance ratio of almost 6-to-1. A group of residents, taxpayers, and voters brought suit, alleging that the legislative malapportionment violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ultimately, the circuit court held that as to certain counties there was invidious discrimination in the apportionment of the House and that the senatorial apportionment was constitutional. The Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed. Wed, 13 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53909 at http://www.oyez.org Maryland Committee v. Tawes - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_29/argument-2 Under its 1867 Constitution, the State of Maryland's Senate has 29 seats, one for each of 23 counties and six for the City of Baltimore's legislative districts. The State's five most populous political subdivisions with over three-fourths of the 1960 population are represented by only slightly over one-third of the Senate's membership. In the House of Delegates, after temporary legislation in 1962, there existed a maximum population-variance ratio of almost 6-to-1. A group of residents, taxpayers, and voters brought suit, alleging that the legislative malapportionment violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ultimately, the circuit court held that as to certain counties there was invidious discrimination in the apportionment of the House and that the senatorial apportionment was constitutional. The Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed. Wed, 13 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53910 at http://www.oyez.org Reynolds v. Sims - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_23/argument In 1961, M.O. Sims, David J. Vann (Vann v. Baggett), John McConnell (McConnell v. Baggett), and other voters from Jefferson County, Alabama, challenged the apportionment of the state legislature. The Alabama Constitution prescribed that each county was entitled to at least one representative and that there were to be as many senatorial districts as there were senators. Population variance ratios of as great as 41-to-1 existed in the Senate. Wed, 13 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53915 at http://www.oyez.org WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_20/argument-1 The WMCA, acting on behalf of several New York City registered voters, challenged the constitutionality of Article III, Sections 2-5 of the New York State constitution alleging that its apportionment formula resulted in unfair weighting of both state legislature houses by favoring lesser populated rural areas over densely populated urban centers. On appeal from a dismissal of their complaint by a three-judge district court, the Supreme Court granted the WMCA certiorari. Tue, 12 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53907 at http://www.oyez.org WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_20/argument-2 The WMCA, acting on behalf of several New York City registered voters, challenged the constitutionality of Article III, Sections 2-5 of the New York State constitution alleging that its apportionment formula resulted in unfair weighting of both state legislature houses by favoring lesser populated rural areas over densely populated urban centers. On appeal from a dismissal of their complaint by a three-judge district court, the Supreme Court granted the WMCA certiorari. Tue, 12 Nov 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53908 at http://www.oyez.org Smith v. Mississippi - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_667/argument None Tue, 30 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80445 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Bianchi & Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_529/argument None Mon, 29 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80392 at http://www.oyez.org Braunstein v. Commissioner - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_476/argument None Mon, 29 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80368 at http://www.oyez.org Rideau v. Louisiana - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_630/argument None Mon, 29 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80431 at http://www.oyez.org Campbell v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_631/argument None Thu, 25 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80432 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Singer Mfg. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_438/argument-1 None Thu, 25 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80352 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Singer Mfg. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_438/argument-2 None Thu, 25 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80353 at http://www.oyez.org Sherbert v. Verner - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_526/argument Adeil Sherbert, a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, was fired from her job after she refused to work on Saturday, the Sabbath Day of her faith. The South Carolina Employment Security Commission denied her benefits, finding unacceptable her religious justification for refusing Saturday work. Wed, 24 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53559 at http://www.oyez.org Norvell v. Illinois - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_513/argument None Wed, 24 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80388 at http://www.oyez.org Bus Employees v. Missouri - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_604/argument-1 None Wed, 24 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80419 at http://www.oyez.org Bus Employees v. Missouri - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_604/argument-2 None Wed, 24 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80420 at http://www.oyez.org Plumbers' Union v. Borden - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_541/argument None Wed, 24 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80397 at http://www.oyez.org Wheeldin v. Wheeler - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_493/argument None Tue, 23 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80380 at http://www.oyez.org Iron Workers v. Perko - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_482/argument-1 None Tue, 23 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80371 at http://www.oyez.org Iron Workers v. Perko - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_482/argument-2 None Tue, 23 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80372 at http://www.oyez.org Mcneese v. Board Of Education - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_480/argument None Tue, 23 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80369 at http://www.oyez.org Reed v. The Yaka - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_509/argument None Mon, 22 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80384 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Muniz - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_464/argument-1 None Mon, 22 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80363 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Muniz - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_464/argument-2 None Mon, 22 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80364 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Braverman - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_506/argument None Mon, 22 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80383 at http://www.oyez.org Labor Board v. General Motors - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_404/argument None Thu, 18 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80341 at http://www.oyez.org Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_368/argument None Thu, 18 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80326 at http://www.oyez.org Fitzgerald v. United States Lines - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_463/argument None Thu, 18 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80362 at http://www.oyez.org Watson v. Memphis - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_424/argument-1 None Wed, 17 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80349 at http://www.oyez.org Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_414/argument None Wed, 17 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80346 at http://www.oyez.org Watson v. Memphis - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_424/argument-2 None Wed, 17 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80350 at http://www.oyez.org U.S. v. Pioneer American Ins. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_405/argument None Wed, 17 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80343 at http://www.oyez.org White v. Maryland - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_600/argument None Tue, 16 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80418 at http://www.oyez.org Moseley v. Electronic Facilities - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_401/argument-2 None Tue, 16 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80338 at http://www.oyez.org Moseley v. Electronic Facilities - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_401/argument-1 None Tue, 16 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80337 at http://www.oyez.org Head v. New Mexico Board - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_392/argument-1 None Mon, 15 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80334 at http://www.oyez.org Hawaii v. Gordon - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_12_orig/argument None Mon, 15 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80233 at http://www.oyez.org Head v. New Mexico Board - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_392/argument-2 None Mon, 15 Apr 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80335 at http://www.oyez.org Colorado Comm'n v. Continental - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_146/argument-2 None Thu, 28 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80243 at http://www.oyez.org Maximov v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_240/argument None Thu, 28 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80283 at http://www.oyez.org Colorado Comm'n v. Continental - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_146/argument-1 None Thu, 28 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80242 at http://www.oyez.org B. & O. R. Co. v. Boston & M. R. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_97/argument-1 None Wed, 27 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80501 at http://www.oyez.org B. & O. R. Co. v. Boston & M. R. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_97/argument-2 None Wed, 27 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80502 at http://www.oyez.org Whipple v. Commissioner - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_305/argument-2 None Tue, 26 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80307 at http://www.oyez.org Rosenberg v. Fleuti - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_248/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80286 at http://www.oyez.org Jacobellis v. Ohio - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_11_2/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80219 at http://www.oyez.org Whipple v. Commissioner - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_305/argument-1 None Tue, 26 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80306 at http://www.oyez.org Andrews v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_491/argument-1 None Mon, 25 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80377 at http://www.oyez.org Sperry v. Florida - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_322/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80315 at http://www.oyez.org Andrews v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_491/argument-2 None Mon, 25 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80378 at http://www.oyez.org Railway Clerks v. Allen - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_316/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80310 at http://www.oyez.org Gutierrez v. Waterman S. S. Corp. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_229/argument None Thu, 21 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80279 at http://www.oyez.org Dixilyn Corp. v. Crescent Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_297/argument None Thu, 21 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80303 at http://www.oyez.org Goss v. Board Of Education - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_217/argument-2 None Wed, 20 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80275 at http://www.oyez.org Downum v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_489/argument None Wed, 20 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80374 at http://www.oyez.org Utah Tax Comm'n v. Pacific Pipe Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_178/argument None Wed, 20 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80259 at http://www.oyez.org Ferguson v. Skrupa - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_111/argument A Kansas statute made it a misdemeanor to enter into contracts for "debt adjusting" (a practice in which a debtor agrees to pay a monthly fee to an adjustor who then makes payments to the debtor's creditor). Skrupa was in business as a "Credit Advisor" and engaged in this practice. A lower court held that the Kansas statute was an "unreasonable regulation of a lawful business" and struck it down. Wed, 20 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80217 at http://www.oyez.org Goss v. Board Of Education - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_217/argument-1 None Wed, 20 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80274 at http://www.oyez.org Basham v. Pennsylvania R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_512/argument None Tue, 19 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80387 at http://www.oyez.org Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_39/argument None Tue, 19 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80333 at http://www.oyez.org Brady v. Maryland - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_490/argument-1 None Mon, 18 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80375 at http://www.oyez.org Namet v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_134/argument None Mon, 18 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80238 at http://www.oyez.org Brady v. Maryland - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_490/argument-2 None Mon, 18 Mar 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80376 at http://www.oyez.org I. C. C. v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_108/argument-1 None Thu, 28 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80215 at http://www.oyez.org I. C. C. v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_108/argument-2 None Thu, 28 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80216 at http://www.oyez.org Abington School District v. Schempp - Oral Argument, Part 2 (No. 119) /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_142/119_argument-%29 The Abington case concerns Bible-reading in Pennsylvania public schools. At the beginning of the school day, students who attended public schools in the state of Pennsylvania were required to read at least ten verses from the Bible. After completing these readings, school authorities required all Abington Township students to recite the Lord's Prayer. Students could be excluded from these exercises by a written note from their parents to the school. In a related case -- Murray v. Curlett -- a Baltimore statute required Bible-reading or the recitation of the Lord's Prayer at open exercises in public schools. Murray and his mother, professed atheists -- challenged the prayer requirement. Wed, 27 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80229 at http://www.oyez.org Abington School District v. Schempp - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_142/argument-1 The Abington case concerns Bible-reading in Pennsylvania public schools. At the beginning of the school day, students who attended public schools in the state of Pennsylvania were required to read at least ten verses from the Bible. After completing these readings, school authorities required all Abington Township students to recite the Lord's Prayer. Students could be excluded from these exercises by a written note from their parents to the school. In a related case -- Murray v. Curlett -- a Baltimore statute required Bible-reading or the recitation of the Lord's Prayer at open exercises in public schools. Murray and his mother, professed atheists -- challenged the prayer requirement. Wed, 27 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53555 at http://www.oyez.org Abington School District v. Schempp - Oral Argument, Part 1 (No. 119) /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_142/119_argument-%29 The Abington case concerns Bible-reading in Pennsylvania public schools. At the beginning of the school day, students who attended public schools in the state of Pennsylvania were required to read at least ten verses from the Bible. After completing these readings, school authorities required all Abington Township students to recite the Lord's Prayer. Students could be excluded from these exercises by a written note from their parents to the school. In a related case -- Murray v. Curlett -- a Baltimore statute required Bible-reading or the recitation of the Lord's Prayer at open exercises in public schools. Murray and his mother, professed atheists -- challenged the prayer requirement. Wed, 27 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80228 at http://www.oyez.org Abington School District v. Schempp - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_142/argument-2 The Abington case concerns Bible-reading in Pennsylvania public schools. At the beginning of the school day, students who attended public schools in the state of Pennsylvania were required to read at least ten verses from the Bible. After completing these readings, school authorities required all Abington Township students to recite the Lord's Prayer. Students could be excluded from these exercises by a written note from their parents to the school. In a related case -- Murray v. Curlett -- a Baltimore statute required Bible-reading or the recitation of the Lord's Prayer at open exercises in public schools. Murray and his mother, professed atheists -- challenged the prayer requirement. Wed, 27 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 53556 at http://www.oyez.org Haynes v. Washington - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_147/argument-1 None Tue, 26 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80244 at http://www.oyez.org Bush v. Texas - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_511/argument None Tue, 26 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80385 at http://www.oyez.org Haynes v. Washington - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_147/argument-2 None Tue, 26 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80245 at http://www.oyez.org Silver v. New York Stock Exchange - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_150/argument-2 None Mon, 25 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80250 at http://www.oyez.org Sanders v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_202/argument None Mon, 25 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80268 at http://www.oyez.org Silver v. New York Stock Exchange - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_150/argument-1 None Mon, 25 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80249 at http://www.oyez.org Boesche v. Udall - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_332/argument None Mon, 25 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80317 at http://www.oyez.org Locomotive Engrs. v. L. & N. R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_94/argument None Thu, 21 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80498 at http://www.oyez.org Willner v. Committee On Character - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_140/argument None Thu, 21 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80239 at http://www.oyez.org Wolf v. Weinstein - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_70/argument None Wed, 20 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80457 at http://www.oyez.org U.S. v. Philadelphia Nat. Bank - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_83/argument-1 None Wed, 20 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80480 at http://www.oyez.org U.S. v. Philadelphia Nat. Bank - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_83/argument-2 None Wed, 20 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80481 at http://www.oyez.org Machinists v. Central Airlines - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_61/argument-1 None Tue, 19 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80421 at http://www.oyez.org Machinists v. Central Airlines - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_61/argument-2 None Tue, 19 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80422 at http://www.oyez.org Lynumn v. Illinois - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_9/argument None Tue, 19 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80494 at http://www.oyez.org Truck Drivers Union v. Riss & Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_180/argument None Tue, 19 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80260 at http://www.oyez.org Weyerhaeuser S. S. Co. v. U.S. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_65/argument None Mon, 18 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80439 at http://www.oyez.org Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_288/argument-2 None Mon, 18 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80300 at http://www.oyez.org Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_288/argument-1 None Mon, 18 Feb 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80299 at http://www.oyez.org Gray v. Sanders - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_112/argument-2 None Thu, 17 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80222 at http://www.oyez.org Grey v. Sanders - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_112/argument None Thu, 17 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 jgoldman 63792 at http://www.oyez.org Gray v. Sanders - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_112/argument-1 None Thu, 17 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80221 at http://www.oyez.org Lane v. Brown - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_283/argument-1 None Wed, 16 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80297 at http://www.oyez.org Lane v. Brown - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_283/argument-2 None Wed, 16 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80298 at http://www.oyez.org Draper v. Washington - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_201/argument None Wed, 16 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80266 at http://www.oyez.org Douglas v. California - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_34/argument None Wed, 16 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80320 at http://www.oyez.org Gideon v. Wainwright - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_155/argument-1 Gideon was charged in a Florida state court with a felony for breaking and entering. He lacked funds and was unable to hire a lawyer to prepare his defense. When he requested the court to appoint an attorney for him, the court refused, stating that it was only obligated to appoint counsel to indigent defendants in capital cases. Gideon defended himself in the trial; he was convicted by a jury and the court sentenced him to five years in a state prison. Tue, 15 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80025 at http://www.oyez.org Gideon v. Wainwright - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_155/argument-2 Gideon was charged in a Florida state court with a felony for breaking and entering. He lacked funds and was unable to hire a lawyer to prepare his defense. When he requested the court to appoint an attorney for him, the court refused, stating that it was only obligated to appoint counsel to indigent defendants in capital cases. Gideon defended himself in the trial; he was convicted by a jury and the court sentenced him to five years in a state prison. Tue, 15 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80026 at http://www.oyez.org Lopez v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_236/argument None Mon, 14 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80282 at http://www.oyez.org White Motor Co. v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_54/argument-1 None Mon, 14 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80398 at http://www.oyez.org White Motor Co. v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_54/argument-2 None Mon, 14 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80399 at http://www.oyez.org Arrow Transp. Co. v. Southern R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_430/argument None Thu, 10 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80351 at http://www.oyez.org Simler v. Conner - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_59/argument-2 None Wed, 09 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80414 at http://www.oyez.org Wisconsin v. Fed. Power Comm'n. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_72/argument-1 None Wed, 09 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80461 at http://www.oyez.org Wisconsin v. Fed. Power Comm'n. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_72/argument-2 None Wed, 09 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80462 at http://www.oyez.org Simler v. Conner - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_59/argument-1 None Wed, 09 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80413 at http://www.oyez.org Florida Avocado Growers v. Paul - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_45/argument None Tue, 08 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80358 at http://www.oyez.org Fay v. Noia - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_84/argument-1 None Mon, 07 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80482 at http://www.oyez.org Dugan v. Rank - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_31/argument-1 None Mon, 07 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80308 at http://www.oyez.org Fay v. Noia - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_84/argument-2 None Mon, 07 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80483 at http://www.oyez.org Dugan v. Rank - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_31/argument-2 None Mon, 07 Jan 1963 13:00:00 +0000 80309 at http://www.oyez.org Williams v. Zuckert - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_133/argument None Thu, 13 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80237 at http://www.oyez.org Northern Gas Co. v. Kansas Comm'n - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_62/argument None Thu, 13 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80430 at http://www.oyez.org Edwards v. South Carolina - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_86/argument The 187 petitioners in this case, all of whom were black, organized a march to the South Carolina State House grounds in which small groups of fifteen would walk in an open public area protesting the policies of segregation in their state. The march was peaceful, did not block pedestrian or vehicular traffic, and was conducted in an orderly fashion on public property. A group of approximately thirty police officers confronted the group and ordered its members to disperse or to submit to arrest. The marchers did not disperse, and instead began singing religious and patriotic songs like the Star Spangled Banner. They were arrested and later convicted on a charge of breach of the peace. Thu, 13 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 53562 at http://www.oyez.org Incres S. S. Co. v. Maritime Workers - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_33/argument None Wed, 12 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80316 at http://www.oyez.org Mcculloch v. Sociedad Nacional - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_107/argument-1 None Tue, 11 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80212 at http://www.oyez.org New Jersey v. New York, S. & W. R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_104/argument None Tue, 11 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80209 at http://www.oyez.org Mcculloch v. Sociedad Nacional - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_107/argument-2 None Tue, 11 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80213 at http://www.oyez.org Mcculloch v. Sociedad Nacional - Oral Argument, Part 3 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_107/argument-3 None Tue, 11 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80214 at http://www.oyez.org Ker v. California - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_53/argument None Tue, 11 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80394 at http://www.oyez.org Schlude v. Commissioner - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_80/argument None Mon, 10 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80473 at http://www.oyez.org Best v. Humboldt Mining Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_52/argument None Mon, 10 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80390 at http://www.oyez.org Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_76/argument None Mon, 10 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80467 at http://www.oyez.org Yellin v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_35/argument None Thu, 06 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80322 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Gilmore - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_21/argument-1 None Wed, 05 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80270 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Gilmore - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_21/argument-2 None Wed, 05 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80271 at http://www.oyez.org Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_118/argument-1 None Mon, 03 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80225 at http://www.oyez.org Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_118/argument-2 None Mon, 03 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80226 at http://www.oyez.org Jones v. Cunningham - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_77/argument None Mon, 03 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80470 at http://www.oyez.org Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_88/argument None Mon, 03 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80488 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Buffalo Sa v. Bank - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_96/argument None Mon, 03 Dec 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80499 at http://www.oyez.org Federal Trade Comm'n v. Sun Oil Co. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_56/argument None Thu, 15 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80402 at http://www.oyez.org Ford v. Ford - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_63/argument None Thu, 15 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80433 at http://www.oyez.org Schroeder v. City Of New York - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_75/argument None Thu, 15 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80466 at http://www.oyez.org Cleary v. Bolger - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_57/argument-1 None Wed, 14 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80405 at http://www.oyez.org Cleary v. Bolger - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_57/argument-2 None Wed, 14 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80406 at http://www.oyez.org Foman v. Davis - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_41/argument None Wed, 14 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80344 at http://www.oyez.org Pan American World Airways v. U.S. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_23/argument None Thu, 08 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80280 at http://www.oyez.org Construction Laborers v. Curry - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_87/argument-1 None Wed, 07 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80486 at http://www.oyez.org Construction Laborers v. Curry - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_87/argument-2 None Wed, 07 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80487 at http://www.oyez.org Wright v. Georgia - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_68/argument None Wed, 07 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80449 at http://www.oyez.org Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_67/argument None Tue, 06 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80446 at http://www.oyez.org Peterson v. City Of Greenville - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_71/argument-1 None Tue, 06 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80458 at http://www.oyez.org Gober v. City Of Birmingham - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_66/argument None Tue, 06 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80444 at http://www.oyez.org Peterson v. City Of Greenville - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_71/argument-2 None Tue, 06 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80459 at http://www.oyez.org Avent v. North Carolina - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_11/argument None Mon, 05 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80218 at http://www.oyez.org Lombard v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_58/argument-1 None Mon, 05 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80408 at http://www.oyez.org Griffin v. Maryland - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_6/reargument On June 30, 1960, several white and black people picketed the private Glen Echo Amusement Park in Montgomery County, Maryland. The demonstrators protested against the park's policy "not to have colored people on the rides, or in the park." During the demonstration, William Griffin and four other Negroes entered the park to test its management's resolve. A state deputy, who worked as a security staff member in the park, soon observed them. After informing them of the park's racial policy, the deputy asked them to leave. When Griffin and his friends refused, they were arrested and later convicted for criminal trespass. State appellate courts affirmed the convictions. The Supreme Court granted certiorari. Mon, 05 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62306 at http://www.oyez.org Griffin v. Maryland - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_6/argument On June 30, 1960, several white and black people picketed the private Glen Echo Amusement Park in Montgomery County, Maryland. The demonstrators protested against the park's policy "not to have colored people on the rides, or in the park." During the demonstration, William Griffin and four other Negroes entered the park to test its management's resolve. A state deputy, who worked as a security staff member in the park, soon observed them. After informing them of the park's racial policy, the deputy asked them to leave. When Griffin and his friends refused, they were arrested and later convicted for criminal trespass. State appellate courts affirmed the convictions. The Supreme Court granted certiorari. Mon, 05 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 53560 at http://www.oyez.org Lombard v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_58/argument-2 None Mon, 05 Nov 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80409 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Sampson - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_69/argument None Thu, 18 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80451 at http://www.oyez.org U.S. v. Georgia Pub. Ser v. Comm'n. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_81/argument None Thu, 18 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80474 at http://www.oyez.org F. P. C. v. Tennessee Gas Co. - Oral Argument, Part incomplete /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_48/argument-e None Wed, 17 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80370 at http://www.oyez.org Paul v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_19/argument-1 None Wed, 17 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80263 at http://www.oyez.org Paul v. United States - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_19/argument-2 None Wed, 17 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80264 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Loew's Inc. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_42/argument None Tue, 16 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80348 at http://www.oyez.org Southern Const. Co. v. Pickard - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_46/argument None Tue, 16 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80360 at http://www.oyez.org Gilbertville Trucking Co. v. U.S. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_40/argument None Mon, 15 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80339 at http://www.oyez.org Burlington Truck Lines v. U.S. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_27/argument-1 None Mon, 15 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80291 at http://www.oyez.org Burlington Truck Lines v. U.S. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_27/argument-2 None Mon, 15 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80292 at http://www.oyez.org Hewitt-Robins v. Freight-Ways - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_37/argument None Thu, 11 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80327 at http://www.oyez.org Shotwell Mfg. Co. v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_16/argument None Thu, 11 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80253 at http://www.oyez.org Meat Drivers v. United States - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_38/argument None Wed, 10 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80329 at http://www.oyez.org Smith v. Evening News Assn. - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_13/argument None Wed, 10 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80235 at http://www.oyez.org Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_78/argument-1 None Tue, 09 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80471 at http://www.oyez.org Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co. - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_78/argument-2 None Tue, 09 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80472 at http://www.oyez.org Townsend v. Sain - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_8/argument-1 None Mon, 08 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80476 at http://www.oyez.org Wong Sun v. United States - Oral Argument /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_36/argument None Mon, 08 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80323 at http://www.oyez.org Townsend v. Sain - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_8/argument-2 None Mon, 08 Oct 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80477 at http://www.oyez.org Robinson v. California - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_554/argument A California statute made it a criminal offense for a person to "be addicted to the use of narcotics." Lawrence Robinson was convicted under the law, which required a sentence of at least ninety days in jail. A state appellate court affirmed Robinson's conviction on appeal. Tue, 17 Apr 1962 13:00:00 +0000 53563 at http://www.oyez.org Engel v. Vitale - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_468/argument The Board of Regents for the State of New York authorized a short, voluntary prayer for recitation at the start of each school day. This was an attempt to defuse the politically potent issue by taking it out of the hands of local communities. The blandest of invocations read as follows: "Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and beg Thy blessings upon us, our teachers, and our country." Tue, 03 Apr 1962 13:00:00 +0000 53564 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. Patrick - Oral Reargument /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_22/reargument None Wed, 28 Mar 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80278 at http://www.oyez.org Halliburton Oil Well Co. v. Reily - Oral Reargument /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_24/reargument None Mon, 26 Mar 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80284 at http://www.oyez.org Presser v. United States - Oral Reargument /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_25/reargument None Thu, 22 Mar 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80287 at http://www.oyez.org United States v. National Dairy Corp. - Oral Reargument /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_18/reargument None Wed, 21 Mar 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80261 at http://www.oyez.org Mercantile Nat. Bank v. Langdeau - Oral Reargument /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_14_2/reargument None Tue, 27 Feb 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80240 at http://www.oyez.org Arizona v. California - Oral Reargument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_8_orig/reargument-1 None Mon, 08 Jan 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80489 at http://www.oyez.org Arizona v. California - Oral Reargument, Part 4 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_8_orig/reargument-4 None Mon, 08 Jan 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80493 at http://www.oyez.org Arizona v. California - Oral Reargument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_8_orig/reargument-2 None Mon, 08 Jan 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80491 at http://www.oyez.org Arizona v. California - Oral Reargument, Part 3 /cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_8_orig/reargument-3 None Mon, 08 Jan 1962 13:00:00 +0000 80492 at http://www.oyez.org Gibson v. Florida Legis. Investigation Comm. - Oral Reargument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_6/reargument-1 In the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) received much criticism from state legislators as it pushed ahead with litigation to combat segregation. The State of Florida, in 1959, established a Legislative Investigation Committee to study what were called "subversive organizations." Gibson, president of the Miami branch of the NAACP, was subpoenaed before the committee and asked to produce a membership list of his organization. He refused and was found in contempt. Tue, 05 Dec 1961 13:00:00 +0000 80426 at http://www.oyez.org Gibson v. Florida Legis. Investigation Comm. - Oral Reargument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_6/reargument-2 In the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) received much criticism from state legislators as it pushed ahead with litigation to combat segregation. The State of Florida, in 1959, established a Legislative Investigation Committee to study what were called "subversive organizations." Gibson, president of the Miami branch of the NAACP, was subpoenaed before the committee and asked to produce a membership list of his organization. He refused and was found in contempt. Tue, 05 Dec 1961 13:00:00 +0000 80427 at http://www.oyez.org Gibson v. Florida Legis. Investigation Comm. - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_6/argument In the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) received much criticism from state legislators as it pushed ahead with litigation to combat segregation. The State of Florida, in 1959, established a Legislative Investigation Committee to study what were called "subversive organizations." Gibson, president of the Miami branch of the NAACP, was subpoenaed before the committee and asked to produce a membership list of his organization. He refused and was found in contempt. Tue, 05 Dec 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53569 at http://www.oyez.org NAACP v. Button - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_5/reargument The NAACP was prosecuted for violating a Virginia statute which banned "the improper solicitation of any legal or professional business." Wed, 08 Nov 1961 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62314 at http://www.oyez.org NAACP v. Button - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_5/argument The NAACP was prosecuted for violating a Virginia statute which banned "the improper solicitation of any legal or professional business." Wed, 08 Nov 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53572 at http://www.oyez.org Hoyt v. Florida - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_31/argument A Florida statute automatically exempted women from jury duty and did not place women on jury lists. Women could, however, volunteer and register for jury duty. After an all-male jury convicted Mrs. Hoyt for murdering her husband, she appealed the decision to the Florida Supreme Court. The Florida Court upheld the conviction. Thu, 19 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53568 at http://www.oyez.org Garner v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 3 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_26/argument-3 None Wed, 18 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53567 at http://www.oyez.org Garner v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_26/argument-1 None Wed, 18 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53565 at http://www.oyez.org Garner v. Louisiana - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_26/argument-2 None Wed, 18 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53566 at http://www.oyez.org Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_2/argument-1 Francisco Mendoza-Martinez (Martinez) was an American by birth with dual Mexican citizenship. Martinez admitted that to avoid the draft, in 1942, he left the United States for Mexico and did not return until November, 1946. As a result of his deliberate absence, Martinez entered a guilty plea in 1947 to violating Section 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (the "Act") and served 366 days in prison. Five years after his release, Martinez was issued an arrest and deportation warrant premised on a violation of Section 401(j) of the Act which divested draft dodgers of their U.S. citizenship. Following a dismissal of his appeal from the Attorney General's special inquiry decision stripping him of his U.S. citizenship, Martinez challenged the constitutionality of Section 401(j) in District Court but was defeated. On appeal from the Ninth Circuit's opinion upholding the district court decision, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. This case was decided together with Rusk v. Cort. Tue, 10 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53570 at http://www.oyez.org Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez - Oral Reargument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_2/reargument Francisco Mendoza-Martinez (Martinez) was an American by birth with dual Mexican citizenship. Martinez admitted that to avoid the draft, in 1942, he left the United States for Mexico and did not return until November, 1946. As a result of his deliberate absence, Martinez entered a guilty plea in 1947 to violating Section 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (the "Act") and served 366 days in prison. Five years after his release, Martinez was issued an arrest and deportation warrant premised on a violation of Section 401(j) of the Act which divested draft dodgers of their U.S. citizenship. Following a dismissal of his appeal from the Attorney General's special inquiry decision stripping him of his U.S. citizenship, Martinez challenged the constitutionality of Section 401(j) in District Court but was defeated. On appeal from the Ninth Circuit's opinion upholding the district court decision, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. This case was decided together with Rusk v. Cort. Tue, 10 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 admin 62313 at http://www.oyez.org Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_2/argument-2 Francisco Mendoza-Martinez (Martinez) was an American by birth with dual Mexican citizenship. Martinez admitted that to avoid the draft, in 1942, he left the United States for Mexico and did not return until November, 1946. As a result of his deliberate absence, Martinez entered a guilty plea in 1947 to violating Section 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (the "Act") and served 366 days in prison. Five years after his release, Martinez was issued an arrest and deportation warrant premised on a violation of Section 401(j) of the Act which divested draft dodgers of their U.S. citizenship. Following a dismissal of his appeal from the Attorney General's special inquiry decision stripping him of his U.S. citizenship, Martinez challenged the constitutionality of Section 401(j) in District Court but was defeated. On appeal from the Ninth Circuit's opinion upholding the district court decision, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. This case was decided together with Rusk v. Cort. Tue, 10 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53571 at http://www.oyez.org Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez - Oral Reargument, Part 1 (No. 3) /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_2/3_reargument-%29 Francisco Mendoza-Martinez (Martinez) was an American by birth with dual Mexican citizenship. Martinez admitted that to avoid the draft, in 1942, he left the United States for Mexico and did not return until November, 1946. As a result of his deliberate absence, Martinez entered a guilty plea in 1947 to violating Section 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (the "Act") and served 366 days in prison. Five years after his release, Martinez was issued an arrest and deportation warrant premised on a violation of Section 401(j) of the Act which divested draft dodgers of their U.S. citizenship. Following a dismissal of his appeal from the Attorney General's special inquiry decision stripping him of his U.S. citizenship, Martinez challenged the constitutionality of Section 401(j) in District Court but was defeated. On appeal from the Ninth Circuit's opinion upholding the district court decision, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. This case was decided together with Rusk v. Cort. Tue, 10 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 80312 at http://www.oyez.org Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez - Oral Reargument, Part 2 (No. 3) /cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_2/3_reargument-%29 Francisco Mendoza-Martinez (Martinez) was an American by birth with dual Mexican citizenship. Martinez admitted that to avoid the draft, in 1942, he left the United States for Mexico and did not return until November, 1946. As a result of his deliberate absence, Martinez entered a guilty plea in 1947 to violating Section 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (the "Act") and served 366 days in prison. Five years after his release, Martinez was issued an arrest and deportation warrant premised on a violation of Section 401(j) of the Act which divested draft dodgers of their U.S. citizenship. Following a dismissal of his appeal from the Attorney General's special inquiry decision stripping him of his U.S. citizenship, Martinez challenged the constitutionality of Section 401(j) in District Court but was defeated. On appeal from the Ninth Circuit's opinion upholding the district court decision, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. This case was decided together with Rusk v. Cort. Tue, 10 Oct 1961 13:00:00 +0000 80313 at http://www.oyez.org Baker v. Carr - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_6/argument-1 Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state. Wed, 19 Apr 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53578 at http://www.oyez.org Baker v. Carr - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_6/argument-2 Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state. Wed, 19 Apr 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53579 at http://www.oyez.org Mapp v. Ohio - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_236/argument Dollree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive. She appealed her conviction on the basis of freedom of expression. Wed, 29 Mar 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53577 at http://www.oyez.org Poe v. Ullman - Oral Argument, Part 2 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_60/argument-2 An old Connecticut law prohibited the use of contraceptive devices and the giving of medical advice in the use of those devices. The law also applied to married couples. The Connecticut Attorney General threatened to enforce the law against three individuals in this case including Jane Doe (Doe v. Pullman). Mrs. Doe, having recovered from a tough pregnancy which threatened her life and left her with several emotional and physical disabilities, was informed by her physician that any additional pregnancies could be fatal. She challenged the Connecticut law since it criminalized her use of contraceptives. Wed, 01 Mar 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53574 at http://www.oyez.org Poe v. Ullman - Oral Argument, Part 1 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_60/argument-1 An old Connecticut law prohibited the use of contraceptive devices and the giving of medical advice in the use of those devices. The law also applied to married couples. The Connecticut Attorney General threatened to enforce the law against three individuals in this case including Jane Doe (Doe v. Pullman). Mrs. Doe, having recovered from a tough pregnancy which threatened her life and left her with several emotional and physical disabilities, was informed by her physician that any additional pregnancies could be fatal. She challenged the Connecticut law since it criminalized her use of contraceptives. Wed, 01 Mar 1961 13:00:00 +0000 53573 at http://www.oyez.org Braunfeld v. Brown - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_67/argument Abraham Braunfeld owned a retail clothing and home furnishing store in Philadelphia. As an Orthodox Jew, he was prohibited by his faith from working on Saturday, the Sabbath. The Pennsylvania blue law only allowed certain stores to remain open for business on Sundays. Braunfeld's store was not one of those types allowed to be open. He challenged the law as a violation of the religious liberty clauses because he needed to be open six days a week for economic reasons and was prohibited from doing so by a tenet of his faith and the blue law. Thu, 08 Dec 1960 13:00:00 +0000 53575 at http://www.oyez.org McGowan v. Maryland - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_8/argument Several employes of a discount department store sold a few items, such as floor wax and loose-leaf notebooks, to customers on a Sunday. By doing so, they violated Maryland's blue laws which only allow certain items, such as drugs, tobacco, newspapers and some foodstuffs, to be sold on Sundays. Thu, 08 Dec 1960 13:00:00 +0000 53580 at http://www.oyez.org Monroe v. Pape - Oral Argument, Part 1 /cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_39/argument-1 On October 29, 1958, thirteen police officers, including Frank Pape, arrived at James Monroe's Chicago apartment at 5:45 A.M. The officers broke down the door, forced Monroe and his wife to stand naked in their living room, and ransacked the apartment. Afterwards, James Monroe was escorted to police quarters and held for ten hours on "open" charges while he was interrogated about a murder. The police did not have a warrant for the search or the arrest, and refused Monroe permission to call his attorney. Monroe brought a complaint against each of the Chicago police officers individually and against the City of Chicago. The City of Chicago moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it was not liable under the Civil Rights Act nor for acts committed in performance of governmental functions. All defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that there was no cause of action under the Civil Rights Acts. The district court dismissed the complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal. Tue, 08 Nov 1960 13:00:00 +0000 80586 at http://www.oyez.org Monroe v. Pape - Oral Argument, Part 2 /cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_39/argument-2 On October 29, 1958, thirteen police officers, including Frank Pape, arrived at James Monroe's Chicago apartment at 5:45 A.M. The officers broke down the door, forced Monroe and his wife to stand naked in their living room, and ransacked the apartment. Afterwards, James Monroe was escorted to police quarters and held for ten hours on "open" charges while he was interrogated about a murder. The police did not have a warrant for the search or the arrest, and refused Monroe permission to call his attorney. Monroe brought a complaint against each of the Chicago police officers individually and against the City of Chicago. The City of Chicago moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it was not liable under the Civil Rights Act nor for acts committed in performance of governmental functions. All defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that there was no cause of action under the Civil Rights Acts. The district court dismissed the complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal. Tue, 08 Nov 1960 13:00:00 +0000 80587 at http://www.oyez.org Gomillion v. Lightfoot - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_32/argument An act of the Alabama legislature re-drew the electoral district boundaries of Tuskegee, replacing what had been a region with a square shape with a twenty- eight sided figure. The effect of the new district was to exclude essentially all blacks from the city limits of Tuskegee and place them in a district where no whites lived. Tue, 18 Oct 1960 13:00:00 +0000 53581 at http://www.oyez.org Boynton v. Virginia - Oral Argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_7/argument None Wed, 12 Oct 1960 13:00:00 +0000 53576 at http://www.oyez.org