The Oyez Project: 1969 Term

Adickes v. Kress & Co. (No. 79)

No details yet.

Alexander v. Board Of Education (No. 632)

No details yet.

American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service (No. 369)

No details yet.

Anderson's-Black Rock v. Pavement Co. (No. 45)

No details yet.

Arkansas v. Tennessee (No. 33 ORIG)

No details yet.

Ashe v. Swenson (No. 57)

No details yet.

Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Engineers (No. 477)

No details yet.

Bachellar v. Maryland (No. 729)

No details yet.

Baird v. State Bar Of Arizona (No. 15)

No details yet.

Baldwin v. New York (No. 188)

No details yet.

Barlow v. Collins (No. 249)

No details yet.

Boddie v. Connecticut (No. 27)

No details yet.

Boys Markets v. Clerks Union (No. 768)

No details yet.

Brady v. U. S. (No. 270)

No details yet.

Breen v. Selective Service Board (No. 65)

No details yet.

Brockington v. Rhodes (No. 31)

No details yet.

Bryson v. United States (No. 35)

No details yet.

Byrne v. Karalexis (No. 83)

No details yet.

California v. Green (No. 387)

No details yet.

Carter v. Jury Commission (No. 30)

No details yet.

Chambers v. Maroney (No. 830)

No details yet.

Chandler v. Judicial Council (No. 2 MISC)

No details yet.

Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma (No. 41)

No details yet.

City Of Chicago v. United States (No. 101)

No details yet.

Coleman v. Alabama (No. 72)

No details yet.

Colonnade Corp. v. United States (No. 108)

No details yet.

Conway v. Adult Authority (No. 40)

No details yet.

Czosek v. O'mara (No. 234)

No details yet.

Dandridge v. Williams (No. 131)

No details yet.

Data Processing Service v. Camp (No. 85)

No details yet.

Debacker v. Brainard (No. 15)

No details yet.

Dickey v. Florida (No. 728)

No details yet.

Dutton v. Evans (No. 10)

No details yet.

Dyson v. Stein (No. 41)

No details yet.

Evans v. Abney (No. 60)

No details yet.

Evans v. Cornman (No. 236)

No details yet.

First National Bank v. Dickinson (No. 19)

No details yet.

Goldberg v. Kelly (No. 62)

John Kelly, acting on behalf of New York residents receiving financial assistance either under the federally-assisted program for Families with Dependent Children or under New York State's home relief program, challenged the constitutionality of procedures for notice and termination of such aid. Although originally offering no official notice or opportunity for hearings to those whose aid was scheduled for termination, the State of New York implemented a hearing procedure after commencement of Kelly's litigation.

Goldstein v. Cox (No. 66)

No details yet.

Greenbelt Pub. Assn. v. Bresler (No. 413)

No details yet.

Gutknecht v. United States (No. 71)

No details yet.

Hadley v. Junior College District (No. 37)

No details yet.

Hall v. Beals (No. 39)

No details yet.

Hellenic Lines v. Rhoditis (No. 661)

No details yet.

Hester v. Illinois (No. 82)

No details yet.

Hill v. California (No. 51)

No details yet.

Illinois v. Allen (No. 606)

No details yet.

In Re Spencer (No. 513)

No details yet.

In Re Stolar (No. 18)

No details yet.

In re Winship (No. 778)

At age twelve, Samuel Winship was arrested and charged as a juvenile delinquent for breaking into a woman's locker and stealing $112 from her pocketbook. The charge also alleged that had Winship's act been done by an adult, it would constitute larceny. Relying on Section 744(b) of the New York Family Court Act, which provided that determinations of juvenile's guilt be based on a preponderance of the evidence, a Family Court found Winship guilty, despite acknowledging that the evidence did not establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Winship's appeal of the court's use of the lower "preponderance of the evidence" burden of proof, was rejected in both the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court and in the New York Court of Appeals before the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Jones v. Board Of Education (No. 731)

No details yet.

Lewis v. Martin (No. 829)

No details yet.

Longshoremen v. Ariadne Co. (No. 231)

No details yet.

Mcmann v. Richardson (No. 153)

No details yet.

Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite (No. 64)

No details yet.

Minor v. United States (No. 189)

No details yet.

Mitchell v. Donovan (No. 726)

No details yet.

Monks v. New Jersey (No. 127)

No details yet.

Moon v. Maryland (No. 267)

No details yet.

Moragne v. States Marine Lines (No. 175)

No details yet.

Morales v. New York (No. 86)

No details yet.

Morris v. Schoonfield (No. 782)

No details yet.

Mulloy v. United States (No. 655)

No details yet.

Nash v. United States (No. 678)

No details yet.

Nelson v. George (No. 595)

No details yet.

New Haven Inclusion Cases (No. 915)

No details yet.

NLRB v. Raytheon Co. (No. 440)

No details yet.

NLRB v. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co. (No. 32)

No details yet.

North Carolina v. Alford (No. 14)

No details yet.

Parker v. North Carolina (No. 268)

No details yet.

Phoenix v. Kolodziejski (No. 1066)

No details yet.

Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. (No. 301)

No details yet.

Porter Co. v. NLRB (No. 230)

No details yet.

Price v. Georgia (No. 269)

No details yet.

Reetz v. Bozanich (No. 185)

No details yet.

Rogers v. Bellei (No. 24)

No details yet.

Rosado v. Wyman (No. 540)

No details yet.

Ross v. Bernhard (No. 42)

No details yet.

Rowan v. U. S. Post Office Dept. (No. 399)

No details yet.

Sanks v. Georgia (No. 28)

No details yet.

Schacht v. United States (No. 628)

No details yet.

Sears, Roebuck v. Carpet Layers (No. 476)

No details yet.

Shore Line v. Transportation Union (No. 29)

No details yet.

Simmons v. West Haven Housing (No. 81)

No details yet.

Standard Industries, Inc. v. Tigrett Industries, Inc. (No. 445)

No details yet.

Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park (No. 33)

No details yet.

Taggart v. Weinacker's, Inc. (No. 74)

No details yet.

Tooahnippah v. Hickel (No. 300)

No details yet.

Toussie v. United States (No. 441)

No details yet.

Turner v. Fouche (No. 23)

No details yet.

Turner v. United States (No. 190)

No details yet.

U. S. v. Sisson (No. 305)

No details yet.

U.S. v. Phillipsburg Nat. Bank (No. 1093)

No details yet.

United States v. Armour & Co. (No. 103)

No details yet.

United States v. Davis (No. 282)

No details yet.

United States v. Estate Of Donnelly (No. 104)

No details yet.

United States v. Hilton Hotels (No. 528)

No details yet.

United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission (No. 28)

No details yet.

United States v. Jorn (No. 19)

No details yet.

United States v. Key (No. 402)

No details yet.

United States v. Knox (No. 17)

No details yet.

United States v. Kordel (No. 87)

No details yet.

United States v. Reynolds (No. 88)

No details yet.

United States v. Seckinger (No. 395)

No details yet.

United States v. Van Leeuwen (No. 403)

No details yet.

United States v. Webb, Inc. (No. 63)

No details yet.

United States v. White (No. 13)

No details yet.

Vale v. Louisiana (No. 727)

No details yet.

Wade v. Wilson (No. 55)

No details yet.

Waller v. Florida (No. 24)

No details yet.

Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York (No. 135)

Frederick Walz, the owner of real estate in Richmond County, New York, brought suit against the New York City Tax Commission, challenging property tax exemptions for churches. Walz alleged that the exemptions forced him, as a taxpayer, to indirectly contribute to those churches.

Welsh v. United States (No. 76)

No details yet.

Wheeler v. Montgomery (No. 14)

No details yet.

Williams v. Florida (No. 927)

In 1967, the state of Florida passed legislation to allow six-member juries in criminal cases. Johnny Williams was tried and convicted for robbery by such a jury. Williams, lost in a Florida appellate court; he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Williams v. Illinois (No. 1089)

No details yet.

Woodward v. Commissioner (No. 412)

No details yet.

Wyman v. Rothstein (No. 896)

No details yet.

Zuber v. Allen (No. 25)

No details yet.