Epperson v. Arkansas

Media Items
Advocates
Don Langston (Argued the cause for appellee)
Eugene R. Warren (Argued the cause for the appellants)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
7
Appellee: 
Arkansas
Appellant: 
Epperson
Decided By: 
Warren Court (1967-1969)
Opinion: 
393 U.S. 97 (1968)
Categories: 
freedom of speech, freedom of religion, first amendment, establishment of religion, education

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Epperson v. Arkansas , 393 U.S. 97 (1968)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_7)
Facts of the Case: 

The Arkansas legislature passed a law prohibiting teachers in public or state-supported schools from teaching, or using textbooks that teach, human evolution. Epperson, a public school teacher, sued, claiming the law violated her First Amendment right to free speech as well as the Establishment Clause. The State Chancery Court ruled that it violated his free speech rights; the State Supreme Court reversed.

Question: 

Does a law forbidding the teaching of evolution violate either the free speech rights of teachers or the Establishment clause of the First Amendment?

Conclusion: 

Yes. Seven members of the Court held that the statute violated the Establishment clause. Writing for the Court, Justice Abe Fortas stated that the law had been based solely on the beliefs of fundamentalist Christians, who felt that evolutionary theories directly contradicted the biblical account of Creation. This use of state power to prohibit the teaching of material objectionable to a particular sect ammounted to an unconstitutional Establishment of religion. Justice Fortas wrote, "The State's undoubted right to prescribe the curriculum for its public schools does not carry with it the right to prohibit, on pain of criminal penalty, the teaching of a scientific theory or doctrine where that prohibition is based upon reasons that violate the First Amendment." The two other members of the Court concurred in the result, writing that it violated either the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment (because it was unconstitutionally vague) or the Free Speech clause of the First Amendment.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Epperson, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Establishment of Religion

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Warren
Wrote a special concurrence
Black
Voted with the majority
Douglas
Wrote a special concurrence
Harlan
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote a special concurrence
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote the majority opinion
Fortas
Voted with the majority
Marshall

Full Opinion by Justice Abe Fortas