PROVIDENT BANK v. PATTERSON

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
28
Petitioner 
Provident Bank
Respondent 
Patterson
Tags
Term:
Facts of the Case 

None

Question 

None

Conclusion 
Decision: 9 votes for Provident Bank, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure (or relevant rules of a circuit court)

None

Cite this Page
PROVIDENT BANK v. PATTERSON. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 20 June 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_28>.
PROVIDENT BANK v. PATTERSON, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_28 (last visited June 20, 2014).
"PROVIDENT BANK v. PATTERSON," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed June 20, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_28.