Griswold v. Connecticut

Media Items
Griswold v. Connecticut - Oral Argument, Part 1
Get Adobe Flash Player
Griswold v. Connecticut - Oral Argument, Part 2
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Thomas I. Emerson (Argued the cause for the appellants)
Joseph B. Clark (Argued the cause for the appellee)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
496
Appellee: 
Connecticut
Appellant: 
Griswold
Decided By: 
Warren Court (1962-1965)
Opinion: 
381 U.S. 479 (1965)
Argued: 
March 29-30, 1965
Categories: 
ninth amendment, contraception, privacy, criminal
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Griswold v. Connecticut , 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_496)
Facts of the Case: 

Griswold was the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. Both she and the Medical Director for the League gave information, instruction, and other medical advice to married couples concerning birth control. Griswold and her colleague were convicted under a Connecticut law which criminalized the provision of counselling, and other medical treatment, to married persons for purposes of preventing conception.

Question: 

Does the Constitution protect the right of marital privacy against state restrictions on a couple's ability to be counseled in the use of contraceptives?

Conclusion: 

Though the Constitution does not explicitly protect a general right to privacy, the various guarantees within the Bill of Rights create penumbras, or zones, that establish a right to privacy. Together, the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments, create a new constitutional right, the right to privacy in marital relations. The Connecticut statute conflicts with the exercise of this right and is therefore null and void.

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Griswold, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Due Process

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority, joined Goldberg's concurrence
Warren
Wrote a dissent, joined Stewart's dissent
Black
Wrote the majority opinion
Douglas
Voted with the majority
Clark
Wrote a special concurrence
Harlan
Voted with the majority, joined Goldberg's concurrence
Brennan
Wrote a dissent, joined Black's dissent
Stewart
Wrote a special concurrence
White
Wrote a regular concurrence
Goldberg

Full Opinion by Justice William O. Douglas

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court