The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, April 29, 1964
Decision: Monday, June 22, 1964
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Right to Counsel
Categories: criminal, right to counsel, sixth amendment

Advocates

Barry L. Kroll (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
James R. Thompson (Rgued the cause for the respondent)
Bernard Weisberg (Argued the cause for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, urging reversal)

Facts of the Case

Danny Escobedo was arrested and taken to a police station for questioning. Over several hours, the police refused his repeated requests to see his lawyer. Escobedo's lawyer sought unsuccessfully to consult with his client. Escobedo subsequently confessed to murder.

Question

Was Escobedo denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment?

Conclusion

Yes. Justice Goldberg, in his majority opinion, spoke for the first time of "an absolute right to remain silent." Escobedo had not been adequately informed of his consitutitonal right to remain silent rather than to be forced to incriminate himself. The case has lost authority as precedent as the arguments in police interrogation and confession cases have shifted from the Sixth Amendment to the Fifth Amendment, emphasizing whether the appropriate warnings have been given and given correctly, and whether the right to remain silent has been waived.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Escobedo, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Right to Counsel
Voted with the majority
Douglas
Voted with the majority
Black
Voted with the majority
Warren
Wrote the majority opinion
Goldberg
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote a dissent
White
Voted with the minority, joined White's dissent
Clark
Wrote a dissent, joined White's dissent
Stewart
Wrote a dissent
Harlan
Full Opinion by Justice Arthur J. Goldberg

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_615/>
(last visited ).